Advertisement

ICT Use, Investments in R&D and Workers’ Training, Firms’ Productivity and Markups: The Case of Ecuadorian Manufacturing

  • Jorge Antonio Rodríguez-MorenoEmail author
  • María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina
Original Article

Abstract

We use data from the last Ecuador Economic Census, covering the universe of manufacturing firms, to study the relationship between firms’ R&D and workers’ training investments and ICT use and firms’ productivity and markups. These knowledge-related investments may affect productivity. Moreover, investments in both knowledge and productivity can affect the ability of firms to set prices above marginal costs. Whether R&D and workers’ training investments and ICT are important for productivity and the capacity to set higher markups in developing countries are interesting development policy questions. We find that good business practices, including access to internal capital markets or to external finance, encourage R&D and workers’ training investments, and ICT use. These investments affect positively firms’ productivity and markups. Their influence on markups operates in general through efficiency and prices. Finally, there is evidence about demand conditions to boost knowledge-related investments and markups.

Keywords

R&D ICT Training Productivity Markups Economic development Ecuadorian manufacturing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

J.A. Rodríguez-Moreno gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ecuadorian Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation, under its Grants Program Open Call 2011; and research funds for the period 2014–2019 from the Universidad Santa María Guayaquil, Ecuador. M.E. Rochina-Barrachina also acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad and the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (reference number ECO2017-86793-R, co-financed with FEDER funds, European Union).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aboal, D., and E. Tacsir. 2018. Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: The role of ICT. Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (2): 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Añón-Higón, D. 2012. The impact of ICT on innovative activites: Evidence for UK SMEs. International Small Business Journal 30: 684–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvanitis, S., and E.N. Loukis. 2009. Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labor productivity: A comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland. Information Economics and Policy 21: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aw, B.Y., M.J. Roberts, and T. Winston. 2007. Export market participation, investments in R&D and worker training, and the evolution of firm productivity. The World Economy 30 (1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aw, B.Y., M.J. Roberts, and D.Y. Xu. 2011. R&D investment, exporting and productivity dynamics. American Economic Review 101: 1313–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin, R. 2016. The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benavente, J.M. 2006. The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in Chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 55: 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, A.B., J. Eaton, J.B. Jensen, and S. Kortum. 2003. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 93: 1268–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, S.E., and L.M. Lynch. 2001. How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 83: 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloom, N., M. Darca, T. Kretschmer, R. Sadun, and J. Van Reenen. 2010. The economic impact of ICT. LSE: Center for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
  11. Bratti, M., and G. Felice. 2012. Are exporters more likely to introduce product innovation? The World Economy 35: 1559–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bresnahan, T.F., and M. Trajtenberg. 1995. General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bresnahan, T.F., E. Brynjolfsson, and L.M. Hitt. 2002. Information technololgy, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 339–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brynjolfsson, E., and L.M. Hitt. 2003. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 793–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castiglione, C. 2012. Technical efficiency and ICT investment in Italian manufacturing firms. Applied Economics 44: 1749–1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 3: 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colombo, E., and L. Stanca. 2014. The impact of training on productivity: Evidence from a panel of Italian firms. International Journal of Manpower 35: 1140–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Commander, S., R. Harrison, and N. Menezes-Filho. 2011. ICT and productivity in developing countries: New firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Review of Economics and Statistics 93: 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corchón, L.C., and L. Moreno. 2010. Interpreting markups in Spanish manufacturing: The exponential model. MPRA paper 26609. Munich: University Library of Munich.Google Scholar
  20. Corrado, C., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. 2005. Intangible capital and economic growth measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In Measuring capital in the new economy, studies in income and wealth, vol. 65, ed. C. Corrado, C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Crépon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. Research and development, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crespi, G., and P. Zuniga. 2012. Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development 40 (2): 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Loecker, J., and F. Warzyinski. 2012. Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review 102: 2437–2471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenan, N., A. Topiol-Bensaid, and J. Mairesse. 2001. Information technology and research and development impacts on productivity and skills: Looking for correlations on French firm-level data. In Information technology, productivity, and economic growth, ed. M. Pohjola. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric analysis, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (4): 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, R.E. 1988. The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. Journal of Political Economy 96 (5): 921–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, B. 2011. Innovation and productivity. Nordic Economic Policy Review 2: 165–203.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, B.H., F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2013. Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22: 300–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. INEC. 2010. Economic census of Ecuador. Quito: INEC.Google Scholar
  32. ITU. 2017. Measuring the information society, vol. 1. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  33. Janz, N., H. Loof, and B. Peters. 2004. Innovation and productivity in German and Swedish manufacturing firms: Is there a common story? Problems and Perspectives in Management 2: 184–204.Google Scholar
  34. Konings, J., and S. Vanormelingen. 2015. The impact of training on productivity and wages: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 97: 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies 70: 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melitz, M. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Melitz, M., and G. Ottaviano. 2008. Market size, trade and productivity. Review of Economic Studies 75: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ministerio de Industrias y Productividad. 2016. Política Industrial del Ecuador 2016-2025. https://www.industrias.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/politicaIndustrialweb-16-dic-16-baja.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  39. Olley, G.S., and A. Pakes. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64: 1263–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polder, M., G. van Leeuwen, P. Mohnen, and W. Raymond. 2010. Product, process and organizational innovation: Drivers, complementarity and productivity effects. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 035.Google Scholar
  41. Rincón, A., M. Vecchi, and F.Venturini. 2013. ICT as a general purpose technology: Spillovers, absorptive capacity and productivity performance. Discussion Paper 416. London: NIESR.Google Scholar
  42. Rivers, D., and Q.H. Vuong. 1988. Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics 39: 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roodman, D. 2011. Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata Journal 11: 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SENPLADES. 2017. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2017-2021. Quito-Ecuador. http://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/10/PNBV-26-OCT-FINAL_0K.compressed1.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  45. UNIDO. 2016. Industry 4.0 opportunities and challenges of the new industrial revolution for developing countries and economies in transition (Panel discussion). https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2017-01/Unido_industry-4_NEW_0.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  46. Van Beveren, I. 2012. Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys 26 (1): 98–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Leeuwen, G., and H. van der Wiel. 2003. Do ICT spillovers matter? Evidence from Dutch firm-level data, 26. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  48. WIPO. 2017. The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation feeding the world. Geneva: WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/publications/es/details.jsp?id=4193. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  49. Wooldridge, J.M. 2009. On estimating firm-level production function using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters 104: 112–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. World Economic Forum. 2015. The global competitiveness report 2015-2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2015. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  52. Zwick, T. 2006. The impact of training intensity on establishment productivity. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 45: 26–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversidad Santa MaríaGuayaquilEcuador
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics II, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Applied Economics II, Faculty of Economics and ERICESUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations