Advertisement

The Geography of the Bottom Billion: Rural Isolation and Basic Service Access in the Republic of Mali

  • Leif V. BrottemEmail author
  • Bakary Coulibaly
Original Article

Abstract

This article investigates the challenge of basic service access in one of the world’s poorest regions. Using the Republic of Mali as a case study, the article provides a new perspective on the dominant paradigm of decentralized service provision with a focus on rural areas, where basic services remain persistently inadequate. Service provision in regions such as West Africa will represent one of the most important development challenges in coming decades. This article applies a new geographical framework to decentralized institutions and service provision that is necessary to understand why access to basic services is becoming a more difficult problem to solve. It introduces two new analytical concepts—livelihood extensification and service attenuation—as well as a novel geographic dataset of rural service accessibility to show how rapid population growth and continued dependence on agriculture are putting basic services out of reach for an increasing share of Mali’s population.

Keywords

Sub-Saharan Africa Mali Basic services Decentralization Mobility Land tenure 

Résumé

Cet article examine le défi de l’accès aux services de base dans l’une des régions les plus pauvres du monde. En utilisant la République du Mali comme étude de cas, cet article offre une nouvelle perspective sur le paradigme dominant de l’approvisionnement par les institutions décentralisées, en mettant l’accent sur les zones rurales, où les services de base restent toujours insuffisants. Les services de base dans des régions telles que l’Afrique de l’Ouest représentera l’un des défis de développement les plus importants des prochaines décennies. Cet article applique aux institutions décentralisées et à leur approvisionnement des services un nouveau cadre géographique, nécessaire pour comprendre pourquoi l'accès aux services de base devient un problème plus difficile à résoudre. Il introduit deux nouveaux concepts analytiques - l’extensification des moyens de subsistance et l’atténuation des services - ainsi qu’un nouvel ensemble des données géographiques sur l’accessibilité des services ruraux, démontrant ainsi que la croissance démographique rapide et la dépendance continue à l’agriculture rendent les services de base inaccessibles pour une part croissante de la population malienne.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Lassine Ba and Mamadou Diakite, and Grinnell College Committee for the Support of Faculty Scholarship.

References

  1. Armstrong, C., M. Martinez-Alvarez, N. Singh, T. John, H. Afnan-Holmes, C. Grundy, C. Ruktanochai, J. Borghi, M. Magoma, G. Msemo, Z. Matthews, G. Mtei, and J. Lawn. 2016. Subnational variation for care at birth in Tanzania: Is this explained by place, people, money or drugs? BMC Public Health 16: 795.Google Scholar
  2. Blanford, J., S. Kumar, W. Luo, and A. MacEachren. 2012. It’s a long, long walk: Accessibility to hospitals, maternity and integrated health centers in Niger. International Journal of Health Geographics 11: 24.Google Scholar
  3. Bleck, J., and K. Michelitch. 2015. The 2012 crisis in Mali: Ongoing empirical state failure. African Affairs 114 (457): 598–623.Google Scholar
  4. Blundo, G., and P.-Y. Le Meur. 2009. The governance of daily life in Africa: Ethnographic explorations of public and collective services. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Boone, C. 2013. Property rights and political order in Africa: Land rights and the structure of politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Booth, D. 2011. Towards a theory of local governance and public goods provision. IDS Bulletin 42 (2): 11–21.Google Scholar
  7. Brottem, L.V. 2014. Hosts, strangers and the tenure politics of livestock corridors in Mali. Africa 84 (04): 638–657.Google Scholar
  8. Brottem, L.V. 2018. Dig Your Own Well: A Political Ecology of Rural Institutions in Western Sub-Saharan Africa. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (4): 1075–1095.Google Scholar
  9. Brottem, L.V., and B. Brooks. 2018. Crops and livestock under the sun: Obstacles to rural livelihood adaptations to hotter 21st century temperatures in eastern Senegal. Land Degradation & Development 29 (1): 118–126.Google Scholar
  10. Burrough, P.A., and R.A. McDonell. 1998. Principles of geographic information systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, A., B. Hughes, and G. Milante. 2014. Eradicating poverty in fragile states: Prospects of reaching the ‘high-hanging’ fruit by 2030. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  12. Carlitz, R. 2017. Money flows, water trickles: Understanding patterns of decentralized water provision in Tanzania. World Development 93: 16–30.Google Scholar
  13. Chandy, L., H. Kato, and H. Kharas. 2015. From a billion to zero: Three key ingredients to end extreme poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  14. Cleaver, F., and J. De Koning. 2015. Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons 9 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  15. Conyers, D. 2007. Decentralisation and service delivery: Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Bulletin 38 (1): 18–32.Google Scholar
  16. Duvall, C. 2007. Human settlement and baobab distribution in south-western Mali. Journal of Biogeography 34 (11): 1947–1961.Google Scholar
  17. Erk, J. 2015. Iron houses in the tropical heat: Decentralization reforms in Africa and their consequences. Regional & Federal Studies 25 (5): 409–420.Google Scholar
  18. Essendi, H., F. Johnson, N. Madise, Z. Matthews, J. Falkingham, A. Bahaj, P. James, and L. Blunden. 2015. Infrastructural challenges to better health in maternity facilities in rural Kenya: Community and healthworker perceptions. Reproductive Health 12: 103.Google Scholar
  19. Environmental Systems Research Incorporated (ESRI). 2017. ArcMap version 10.4.1. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Incorporated.Google Scholar
  20. Fay, C., F. Yaouaga, and C. Quiminal. 2006. Décentralisation et pouvoirs en Afrique: En contrepoint, modèles territoriaux français. Paris: IRD Editions.Google Scholar
  21. Fogliati, P., M. Straneo, C. Brogi, P. Fantozzi, R. Salim, H. Msengi, G. Azzimonti, and G. Putoto. 2015. How can childbirth care for the rural poor be improved? A contribution from spatial modelling in rural Tanzania. PLoS ONE 10: e0139460.Google Scholar
  22. Gabrysch, S., S. Cousens, J. Cox, and O. Campbell. 2011. The influence of distance and level of care on delivery place in rural Zambia: a study of linked national data in a geographic information system. PLoS Medicine 8 (1): e1000394.Google Scholar
  23. Gadgil, A. 1998. Drinking water in developing countries. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 23 (1): 253–286.Google Scholar
  24. Gottlieb, J. 2016. Greater expectations: A field experiment to improve accountability in Mali. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 143–157.Google Scholar
  25. Group for Research and Rural Development (GRDR). 2015. Livre bleu Mali: L’eau, la vie, le développement humain. Paris: GRDR.Google Scholar
  26. Idelman, E. 2009. Decentralisation and boundary setting in Mali. In: Making decentralisation work. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  27. Jean, N., M. Burke, M. Xie, W. Davis, D. Lobell, and S. Ermon. 2016. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353 (6301): 790–794.Google Scholar
  28. Khan, Q., J.-P. Faguet, C. Gaukler, and W. Mekasha. 2014. Improving basic services for the bottom forty percent: lessons from Ethiopia. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  29. Kimenyi, M., and P. Meagher. 2004. Devolution and development: Governance prospects in decentralizing states. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  30. Koné, Y. 2006. Les micro-communes: Expression de logiques locales. Bulletin de l’APAD 14: 1–8.Google Scholar
  31. Linard, C.M., R. Gilbert, A.Noor Snow, and A. Tatem. 2012. Population distribution, settlement patterns and accessibility across Africa in 2010. PLoS ONE 7 (2): e31743.Google Scholar
  32. Luis, A., and P. Cabral. 2016. Geographic accessibility to primary healthcare centers in Mozambique. International Journal for Equity in Health 15: 173.Google Scholar
  33. Makanga, P., N. Schuurman, C. Sacoor, H. Boene, F. Vilanculo, M. Vidler, L. Magee, P. von Dadelszen, E. Sevene, K. Munguambe, and T. Firoz. 2017. Seasonal variation in geographical access to maternal health services in regions of southern Mozambique. International Journal of Health Geographics 16 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Masters, S., R. Burstein, G. Amofah, R. Abaogye, S. Kumar, and M. Hanlon. 2013. Travel time to maternity care and its effect on utilization in rural Ghana: A multilevel analysis. Social Science and Medicine 93: 147–154.Google Scholar
  35. Mitchell, A. 1999. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis: Geographic patterns & relationships. Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  36. N’Diaye Keita, R. 1972. Le Haut Senegal Tome III: Kayes et sa region. Bamako: Editions Populaire.Google Scholar
  37. Peet, R., R. Robbins, and M. Watts. 2011. Global political ecology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Reenberg, A., T. Nielsen, and K. Rasmussen. 1998. Field expansion and reallocation in the Sahel-land use pattern dynamics in a fluctuating biophysical and socio-economic environment. Global Environmental Change 8 (4): 309–327.Google Scholar
  39. Reeve, R. 2015. Devils in the detail: Implementing Mali’s new peace accord. London: Oxford Research Group.Google Scholar
  40. Robbins, P. 2011. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Seely, J. 2001. A political analysis of decentralisation: Coopting the Tuareg threat in Mali. The Journal of Modern African Studies 39 (3): 499–524.Google Scholar
  42. Stone, G. 1996. Settlement ecology: the social and spatial organization of Kofyar agriculture. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  43. Taiclet, B., M. Berbach, and M. Sow. 2015. Reussir la decentralisation financiere: Mali. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).Google Scholar
  44. Tappan, G., W. Cushing, S. Cotillon, M. Mathis, J. Hutchinson, and K. Dalsted. 2016. West Africa land use land cover time series product release. Sioux Falls: US Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center.Google Scholar
  45. Turner, M., and O. Moumouni. 2018. Mosaics of property: control of village land in West Africa. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44: 1–25.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 2013. Systems analysis of Mali. Bamako: United States Agency for International Development Mali Bureau.Google Scholar
  47. Wing, S., and B. Kassibo. 2014. Mali: Incentives and challenges for decentralization. In Decentralization in Africa: The paradox of state strength, ed. J.T. Dickovick and J.S. Wunsch, 113–136. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  48. World Bank. 2004. World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  49. World Bank. 2009. World development report: Reshaping economic geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. 2015. Geography of poverty in Mali. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grinnell CollegeGrinnellUSA
  2. 2.BamakoMali

Personalised recommendations