Advertisement

Technical Advisors as Brokers: Translating Gender Equality and Human Rights Policies and Values into Practice in the Water Sector in Nepal

  • Pamela WhiteEmail author
  • Juho Haapala
Original Article

Abstract

How are development policies, prepared by donors, translated into practice in different social settings? Many modalities are used, but we consider bilateral projects to be a conduit for value change and sustainable development. Our case concerns two bilateral projects with Nepali and international technical advisors. The article discusses the complex scenario that technical advisors must navigate to broker policy ideals into practice. They must respect the intentions and regulatory and normative frameworks of the donor and recipient governments, and the local cultures and realities of the local governments and villagers with whom they work. At the same time, they promote value change in support of gender equality and human rights. This also raises the question of whose values count—those of the donor, Nepalese Government, local participants or the advisors? We argue that technical assistance has an indispensable role in facilitating sustainable, equitable and inclusive rural development outcomes in socio-culturally difficult operational environments.

Keywords

Development cooperation Technical advisors Gender equality Social inclusion Rural water supply Human rights Nepal Brokers 

Résumé

Comment les politiques de développement, élaborées par les bailleurs de financement, sont-elles traduites dans la pratique dans différents contextes sociaux? De nombreuses modalités sont utilisées, mais nous considérons que les projets bilatéraux sont un vecteur de changement de valeur et de développement durable. Notre cas concerne deux projets bilatéraux avec des conseillers techniques népalais et internationaux. L’article traite du scénario complexe que doivent suivre les conseillers techniques pour négocier la mise en pratique des idéaux politiques. Ils doivent respecter les intentions et les cadres réglementaires et normatifs des gouvernements bailleur et récipiendaire, ainsi que les cultures et réalités locales des gouvernements locaux et des villageois avec lesquels ils travaillent. Dans le même temps, ils encouragent le changement de valeur en faveur de l’égalité des sexes et des droits humains. Cela soulève également la question de savoir quelles sont les valeurs qui comptent - celles du bailleur de financement, du gouvernement népalais, des participants locaux ou des conseillers? Nous soutenons que l’assistance technique a un rôle indispensable à jouer pour faciliter un développement rural durable, équitable et inclusif dans des environnements opérationnels difficiles sur le plan socioculturel.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the participation of the key informants and project staffs, and the travel grant received from ‘Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry’.

References

  1. Aasland, A. and M. Haug. 2008. Social exclusion in Nepal - stronger or weaker? Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Working Paper 2008:115.Google Scholar
  2. Arora-Jonsson, S. 2012. Gender, development and environmental governance: Theorizing connections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrends, A., S-J. Park and R. Rottenburg. 2014. Travelling models: Introducing an analytical concept to globalisation studies. in Travelling Models in African Conflict Management. Brill Online.Google Scholar
  4. Cleaver, F. 2012. Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resources management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. de Albuquerque, C. and V. Roaf. 2013. On the right track: Good practices in realising the rights to water and sanitation. United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, Lisbon, Textype.Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, C., K. Andersson, E. Ostrom, and S. Shivakumar. 2005. The Samaritan’s dilemma: The political economy of development aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of Nepal. 2016. Nepal Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Sector Development Plan (20162030). Ministry of Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Efficiency Improvement Unit (SEIU).Google Scholar
  8. Haapala, J., Rautanen, S.L., White, P., Keskinen, M. and Varis, O. 2016. Facilitating bricolage through more organic institutional designs? The case of water users’ associations in rural Nepal. International Journal of the Commons 10(2).Google Scholar
  9. Haapala, J. and P. White. 2015. Why do some behaviours change more easily than others? Water use behaviour interventions in rural Nepal. Waterlines, 34(4).Google Scholar
  10. Hänninen, E. 2014. Legitimating aid: Donors and policy making in the rural water supply and sanitation sector in Nepal. Doctoral Thesis. Publication of the Department of Political and Economic Studies 14 (2014), University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. Koponen, J., M. Suoheimo, S. Rugumamu, S. Sharma, and J. Kanner. 2012. Finnish value-added: Boon or bane to aid effectiveness?, 170. Erweko Oy: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar
  12. Leder, S., F. Clement, and E. Karki. 2017. Reframing women’s empowerment in water security programmes in Western Nepal. Gender and Development 25 (2): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer, M. 2017. “They come from above” exploring Finnish development cooperation in the field of meteorology, 1968–2015. Doctoral Thesis. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  14. Meier, B., G. Kayser, J. Kestenbaum, U. Amjad, F. Dalcanale, and J. Bartram. 2014. Translating the human right to water and sanitation into public policy reform. Science and Engineering Ethics 20: 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merry, S.E. 2006. Human rights and gender violence—Translating international law into local justice, 264. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. 2012. Finland’s development policy programme - Government decision-in-principle, 16 February 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. 2016. Finland’s development policy: one world, common future—Toward sustainable development, Government’s Report to Parliament, 4 Feb 2016, Government Publications, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosse, D. 2005. Cultivating development: an ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  19. Mosse, D. 2011. Introduction: The anthropology of expertise and professionals in international development. In Adventures in Aidland: The anthropology of professionals in international development, ed. David Mosse, 1–31. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  20. Odén, B. and L. Wohlgemuth. 2011. Where is the Paris Agenda heading? Changing relations in Tanzania, Zambia and Mozambique. ECPDM Briefing Note No. 21, February 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. 2005. Anthropology and development. Understanding contemporary social change. London: Zed Books. ISBN 9781842774175.Google Scholar
  22. Regmi, S., and B. Fawcett. 1999. Integrating gender needs into drinking-water projects in Nepal. Gender and Development 7 (3): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project - Western Nepal HRBA and GESI Strategy and Action Plan. 2015. Human rights-based approach and gender equality and social inclusion in the water and sanitation sector. RWSSP-WN/DoLIDAR, Nepal. http://www.rwsspwn.org.np/#!phase-ii-publications/ck0f.
  24. Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Support Programme, Nepal, Phase III (RWSSSP III). 2005. Completion report. Kathmandu. December 2005Google Scholar
  25. Rusca, M., and K. Schwartz. 2014. ‘Going with the Grain’: accommodating Local Institutions in Water Governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 11: 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott, W.R. 2008. Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society 37: 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stirrat, R.L. 2000. Cultures of consultancy. Critique of Anthropology 20 (1): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tandon, R. 2010. Whose values count? Voice, values and exclusion in capacity-development processes: experiences from India. In Capacity development in practice, ed. J. Ubels, N. Acquaye-Baddoo, and A. Fowler. Washington: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Udas, P., and M. Zwarteveen. 2010. Can water professionals meet gender goals? A case study of the Department of Irrigation in Nepal. Gender and Development 18 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. United Nations General Assembly, A/64/292. The human right to water and sanitation. 28 July 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Vikman, H. 2011. Mid-term Review of the Strengthening of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project in Western Nepal (RWSSP-WN), MFA FinlandGoogle Scholar
  32. Welber, E. 2012. Contextualizing Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in the WASH Sector. Locating RWSSP-WN’s local level goals in larger frameworks, RWSSP-WN websiteGoogle Scholar
  33. White, P. 2015. The spectrum of motivations, expectations and attitudes in technical development cooperation. Forum for Development Studies 42 (1): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White, P., I.R. Badu, and P. Shrestha. 2015. Achieving sustainable water supply through better institutions, design innovations and Water Safety Plans—the experience from far west Nepal. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 5 (4): 625–631.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, G. 2007. Knowledge, innovation and re-inventing technical assistance for development. Progress in Development Studies 7 (3): 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.FCG International Ltd.HelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.HelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Water and Development Research GroupAalto UniversityAaltoFinland

Personalised recommendations