Advertisement

Learning and Upgrading of Craft Exporters at the Interface of Global Value Chains and Innovation Systems

  • Jan FransenEmail author
  • Peter Knorringa
Original Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Firms operating at the interface of global value chains (GVCs) and innovation systems (ISs) are expected to have better access to knowledge than their competitors, enabling them to learn at a faster pace. This article assesses if and how learning at the interface enables handicraft exporters in emerging economies to upgrade and deepen their capacities. Our conclusion from the analysis of three case studies is that craft exporters incrementally deepen their capacities, but only rarely upgrade. Quasi-hierarchical GVCs in combination with immature ISs are likely to lead to the selective deepening of capacities related to production processes, whereas relational GVC in combination with mature ISs may instead lead to the selective deepening of capacities related to products. The research findings also suggest that GVCs and ISs co-evolve in path-dependent processes. As a result, long periods of incrementally deepening the firms’ capacities are intertwined with occasional spurts of discrete upgrading.

Keywords

Learning Innovation Upgrading Technological capacities Absorptive capacity Emerging economies 

Résumé

On attend des entreprises qui assurent l’interface avec les chaînes de valeur mondiales (CVM) et les systèmes d’innovation (SI) qu’elles aient un meilleur accès à la connaissance que leurs concurrents, ce qui leur permet ainsi d’apprendre plus rapidement. Cet article évalue si et comment l’apprentissage grace à ce contact permet aux exportateurs d’artisanat des économies émergentes de se mettre à niveau et d’approfondir leurs capacités. L’analyse de trois études de cas nous a permis de conclure que les exportateurs de produits artisanaux approfondissaient progressivement leurs capacités, mais ne les mettaient que rarement à niveau. Les CVM quasi-hiérarchiques combinées avec des systèmes d’innovation immatures risquent d’entraîner un approfondissement sélectif des capacités liées aux processus de production, tandis que les CVM relationnelles associées à des systèmes d’innovation matures peuvent conduire à un approfondissement sélectif des capacités liées aux produits. Les résultats de la recherche suggèrent également que les CVM et les SI co-évoluent selon des processus bien balisés. En conséquence, les longues périodes d’approfondissement progressif des capacités des entreprises sont étroitement liées à de soudaines mises à niveau occasionnelles et discrètes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper went through various radical revisions and is now a completely different paper from the initial draft presented at the Aalborg University workshop ‘Innovation Systems in the Era of Global Value Chains (Copenhagen, 24 April 2017) as part of the preparations for a Special Issue in EJDR, later published in Volume 30, no. 3, July 2018. We wish to thank first of all Saradindu Bhaduri, who initially acted as co-author and later as critical friend providing inspiring comments. We also thank the various reviewers for EJDR and the guest editors of the above-mentioned special issue, especially Roberta Rabellotti who continued providing extensive and excellent comments when it was clear that this paper would not make the special issue deadline. Finally, we thank Raul Ramos and Natalia Lorenzoni for committed and timely support and Rupinder Kaur for assistance in the analysis.

References

  1. Arthur, W.B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, B.T., and A. Isaksen. 2002. Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge’. Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1): 77–86.Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B., O. Ejermo, and A. Rickne. 2009. When is Regional Beautiful? Implications for Knowledge Flows, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Introduction. Industry And Innovation 16 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  4. Bathelt, H., and N. Schuldt. 2008. Between Luminaires and Meat Grinders: International Trade Fairs as Temporary Clusters. Regional Studies 42 (6): 853–868.Google Scholar
  5. Bellandi, M., and S. Lombardi. 2012. Specialized Markets and Chinese Industrial Clusters: The Experience of Zhejiang Province. China Economic Review 23 (3): 626–638.Google Scholar
  6. Belussi, F., and S.R. Sedita. 2012. Industrial Districts as Open Learning Systems: Combining Emergent and Deliberate Knowledge Structures. Regional Studies 46 (2): 165–184.Google Scholar
  7. Bhaduri, S., and H. Kumar. 2011. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations to Innovate: Tracing the Motivation of ‘Grassroot’ Innovators in India. Mind & Society 10 (1): 27–55.Google Scholar
  8. Chaminade, C., and J. Vang. 2008. Globalisation of Knowledge Production and Regional Innovation Policy: Supporting Specialized Hubs in the Bangalore Software Industry. Research Policy 37: 1684–1696.Google Scholar
  9. Chiarvesio, M., E. Di Maria, and S. Micelli. 2010. Global Value Chains and Open Networks: The Case of Italian Industrial Districts. European Planning Studies 18 (3): 333–350.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152.Google Scholar
  11. Criscuolo, P., and R. Narula. 2008. A Novel Approach to National Technological Accumulation and Absorptive Capacity: Aggregating Cohen and Levinthal. The European Journal of Development Research 20 (1): 56–73.Google Scholar
  12. DACST. 1998. Cultural Industrial Growth Strategy: The South African Craft Industry Report. Johannesburg: DACST.Google Scholar
  13. Ding, K. (2012) Domestic Market-Based Industrial Cluster Development in Modern China. IDE Discussion Paper 88.2007.2. http://hdl.handle.net/2344/478.
  14. DTI. 2005. Sector Development Strategy: Craft. Johannesburg: DTI.Google Scholar
  15. Dutrénit, G. 2004. Building Technological Capabilities in Latecomer Firms: A Review Essay. Science, Technology and Society 9 (2): 209–241.Google Scholar
  16. Fagerberg, 2005. Introduction: A Guide to the Literature. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Forste, K. 2000. Guest. Chinese Economy 33 (5): 3–14.Google Scholar
  18. Fransen, J. 2016. Crafting Innovations: The Evolving Institutional Regimes of Handicraft Exporters in Emerging Economies. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Fransen, J., and A.H.J. Helmsing. 2017. Absorptive Capacity as a Mediator: Innovation of Handicraft Exporters in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 108 (6): 737–752.Google Scholar
  20. Fransen, J., and A.H.J. Helmsing. 2016. Breaching the Barriers: The Segmented Business and Innovation System of Handicraft Exports in Cape Town. Development Southern Africa 33 (4): 486–501.Google Scholar
  21. GaoHua, X. 2000. Recalling the Rise of the Yiwu Small-Commodities Market. Chinese Economy 33 (5): 48–64.Google Scholar
  22. Gereffi, G. 1999. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics 48 (1): 37–70.Google Scholar
  23. Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2005. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1): 78–104.Google Scholar
  24. Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Gut Feelings: Short Cuts to Better Decision Making. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Giuliani, E. 2011. Role of Technological Gatekeepers in the Growth of Industrial Clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies 45 (10): 1329–1348.Google Scholar
  26. Giuliani, E., V. De Marchi, and R. Rabellotti. 2017. Do Global Value Chains Offer Emerging Economies Learning and Innovation Opportunities? The European Journal of Development Research 30: 389–407.Google Scholar
  27. Humphrey, J., and H. Schmitz. 2002. How does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters? Regional Studies 36 (9): 1017–1027.Google Scholar
  28. Ismalina, P. 2011. An Integrated Analysis of Socioeconomic Structures and Actors in Indonesian Industrial Clusters. Groningen: University Library Groningen.Google Scholar
  29. Kaplinsky, R. 2000. Globalisation and Unequalisation: What Can be Learned from Value Chain Analysis? Journal of Development Studies 37 (2): 117–146.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplinsky, R., and M. Morris. 2001. A Handbook for Value Chain Research, vol. 113. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  31. Keijser, C., and M. Iizuka. 2018. Looking Beyond Global Value Chains in Capacity Development: The Case of the IT-Enabled Service (ITES) Sector in South Africa. The European Journal of Development Research.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0110-7.Google Scholar
  32. Lall, S. 2003. Foreign Direct Investment. Technology Development and Competitiveness: Issue and Evidence. In Competitiveness, FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia, ed. S. Lall, 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, K., M. Szapiro, and Z. Mao. 2017. From Global Value Chains (GVC) to Innovation Systems for Local Value Chains and Knowledge Creation. The European Journal of Development Research.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0111-6.Google Scholar
  34. Lema, R., R. Rabellotti, and P.G. Sampath. 2018. Innovation Trajectories in Developing Countries: Co-Evolution of Global Value Chains and Innovation Systems. The European Journal of Development Research.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0149-0.Google Scholar
  35. Lema, R., R. Quadros, and H. Schmitz. 2015. Reorganising Global Value Chains and Building Innovation Capabilities in Brazil and India. Research Policy 44 (7): 1376–1386.Google Scholar
  36. Lundvall, B. 2007. National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation 14 (1): 95–119.Google Scholar
  37. Lundvall, B., B. Johnson, E.S. Andersen, and B. Dalum. 2002. National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building. Research Policy 31 (2): 213–231.Google Scholar
  38. Lundvall, B.A., J. Vang, K.J. Joseph, and C. Chaminade. 2011. Innovation System Research and Emerging Economies. In Handbook of Innovation Systems and Emerging economies. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, ed. B.A. Lundvall, J. Vang, K.J. Joseph, and C. Chaminade, 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Macpherson, A., and R. Holt. 2007. Knowledge, Learning and Small Firm Growth: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Research Policy 36 (2): 172–192.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, R., and J. Simmie. 2008. Path Dependence and Local Innovation Systems in City-Regions. Innovation 10 (2–3): 183–196.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437.Google Scholar
  42. Meyer-Stamer, J. 2004. Paradoxes and Ironies of Locational Policy in the New Global Economy. In Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading, ed. H. Schmitz. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Mitussis, D. 2010. SME Innovation in Zhejiang, China: Potential Constraints to Development of Widespread Innovation. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China 2 (1): 89–105.Google Scholar
  44. Morrison, A., C. Pietrobelli, and R. Rabellotti. 2008. Global Value Chains and Technological Capabilities: A Framework to Study Learning and Innovation in Developing Countries. Oxford Development Studies 36 (1): 39–58.Google Scholar
  45. OECD. 2005. OSLO Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  46. Perez, C. 2015. Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future. The Political Quarterly 86 (S1): 191–217.Google Scholar
  47. Pietrobelli, C., and R. Rabellotti. 2011. Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Emerging Economies? World Development 39 (7): 1261–1269.Google Scholar
  48. Pietrobelli, C., and C. Staritz. 2017. Upgrading, Interactive Learning, and Innovation Systems in Value Chain Interventions. The European Journal of Development Research.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0112-5.Google Scholar
  49. Popper, M., and R. Lipshitz. 1998. Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 34 (2): 161–179.Google Scholar
  50. Saliola, F., and A. Zanfei. 2009. Multinational Firms, Global Value Chains and the Organization of Knowledge Transfer. Research Policy 38 (2): 369–381.Google Scholar
  51. Schmitz, H., and P. Knorringa. 2000. Learning from Global Buyers. Journal of Development Studies 37 (2): 177–205.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, A., M. Fressoli, and H. Thomas. 2014. Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 114–124.Google Scholar
  53. Sunley, P., S. Pinch, S. Reimer, and J. Macmillen. 2008. Innovation in a Creative Production System: The Case of Design. Journal of Economic Geography 8: 675–698.Google Scholar
  54. Tang, M., and C. Hussler. 2011. Betting on Indigenous Innovation Or Relying on FDI: The Chinese Strategy for Catching-Up. Technology in Society 33 (1): 23–35.Google Scholar
  55. Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.Google Scholar
  56. ter Wengel, J., and E. Rodriquez. 2006. SME Export Performance in Indonesia after the Crisis. Small Business Economics 26: 25–37.Google Scholar
  57. UNCTAD. 2010. Creative Economy Report. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  58. Wang, C.C., and G. Lin. 2013. Dynamics of Innovation in a Globalizing China: Regional Environment, Inter-Firm Relations and Firm Attributes. Journal of Economic Geography 13 (3): 397–418.Google Scholar
  59. Yueh, L. 2013. China’s Growth: The Making of an Economic Superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Zahra, S.A., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185–203.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IHSErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ISSErasmus University RotterdamDen HaagThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations