Advertisement

Subjectivity

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 193–209 | Cite as

Subjectivity and transversality in mental health research: towards a post-qualitative analysis of voyeurism

  • Monique Dalgleish
  • Heidi Everett
  • Cameron DuffEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper offers insights into the challenge of resisting voyeurism in mental health research, whilst contributing to recent efforts to draw a post-qualitative research methodology out of Deleuze and Guattari’s work. Our analysis is motivated by a profound rupture, a break in the trajectory of a specific line of qualitative inquiry occasioned by the passionate refusal of a participant in the empirical study that grounds this paper. Borrowing conceptual and analytical tools from Deleuze and Guattari, we focus on the major ethical and methodological implications of this participant’s refusal. Our analysis will shed light on the rupturing forces of stigma and voyeurism in qualitative inquiry, as well as the symbiotic proliferation of possibilities for collaboration and change that post-qualitative social research might enable. We close by reflecting on the role of affect, rupture, sensation and transversality as sources of, and provocations to, post-qualitative inquiry in mental health research and beyond.

Keywords

Post-qualitative Mental Health Deleuze and Guattari Affect Subjectivity Transversality 

Notes

References

  1. Andresen, R., L. Oades, and P. Caputi. 2011. Psychological recovery: Beyond mental illness. Sydney: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackman, L. 2001. Hearing voices: Embodiment and experience. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  3. Blackman, L. 2012a. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackman, L. 2012b. Listening to voices: An ethics of entanglement. Ethics in Social Research Studies in Qualitative Methodology 12: 173–188.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S1042-3192(2012)0000012012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, C. 2016. Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: thinking through practice. Dordrect: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Church, K. 1995. Forbidden narratives: Critical autobiography as social science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, R., and J. Ringrose (eds.). 2013. Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, L., J. Voronka, D. Landry, J. Reid, B. Mcfarlane, D. Reville, and K. Church. 2012. ‘Recovering our stories’: A small act of resistance. Studies in Social Justice 6 (1): 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalgleish, M. 2017. Art-making and lived experience of schizophrenia: a vitalist materialist analysis. Arts & Health.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2017.139330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, L. 2003. Living outside mental illness: Qualitative studies of recovery in schizophrenia. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B. 2014. Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 734–741.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. 1988. Spinoza: Practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco: City Light Books.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. 1990. The logic of sense (Mark Lester with Charles Stivale, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition, English ed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is philosophy?. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dilkes-Frayne, E., and C. Duff. 2017. Tendencies and trajectories: The problem of subjectivity in posthumanist social research. Environment & Planning D..  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817705660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duff, C. 2014. Assemblages of health: Deleuzes empiricism and the ethology of life. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8893-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duff, C. 2016. Atmospheres of recovery: Assemblages of health. Environment and Planning A 48 (1): 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15603222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox, N. 2011. The ill-health assemblage: Beyond the body-with-organs. Health Sociology Review 20 (4): 359–371.  https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2011.20.4.359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, N. 2013. Creativity and health: An anti-humanist reflection. Health: An interdisciplinary journal for the social study of Health, Illness and Medicine 17 (5): 495–511.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312464074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosz, E. 2013. Habit today: Ravaisson, Bergson, Deleuze and us. Body & Society 19 (2–3): 217–239.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x12472544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hacking, I. 1998. Mad travelers: Reflections on the reality of transient mental illnesses. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies 14 (3): 575–599.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hein, S.F. 2017. Deleuze’s new image of thought: Challenging the dogmatic image of thought in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 23 (9): 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hickey-Moody, A. 2013. Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In Deleuze and research methodologies, ed. R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 79–95. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Kelly, M., and C. Gamble. 2005. Exploring the concept of recovery in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 12 (2): 245.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00828.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kontturi, K.-K. 2013. From double navel to particle-sign: Toward the a-signifying work of painting. In Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts, ed. E. Barrett and B. Bolt, 17–27. London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Lara, A., W. Liu, C.P. Ashley, A. Nishida, R.J. Liebert, and M. Billies. 2017. Affect and subjectivity. Subjectivity 10: 30.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0020-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leamy, M., V. Bird, C. Le Boutillier, J. Williams, and M. Slade. 2011. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 199 (6): 445–452.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LeFrancois, B.A., R. Menzies, and G. Reaume (eds.). 2013. Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies, 1st ed. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc.Google Scholar
  32. MacLure, M. 2013. Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE) 26 (6): 658–667.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013788755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massumi, B. 2009. Of microperception and micropolitics: An interview with Brian Massumi, 15th August 2008. Inflexions: A Journal for Research-Creation. Micropolitics: Exploring Ethico-Aesthetics 3: 1–20.Google Scholar
  34. McWade, B. 2015. Temporalities of mental health recovery. Subjectivity 8: 243–260.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2015.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McWade, B. 2019. What is autoethnography? The classificatory, confessional and mad politics of lived experience in sociological research. Social Theory and Health.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00090-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morrow, M. 2013. Recovery: Progressive paradigm or neoliberal smokescreen? In Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies, 1st ed, ed. B.A. LeFrancois, R. Menzies, and G. Reaume, 323–333. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Mulcahy, D. 2016. ‘Sticky’ learning: Assembling bodies, objects and affects at the museum and beyond. In Learning bodies: The body in youth and childhood studies, ed. H. Cahill, J. Coffey, and S. Budgeon, 207–222. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. National Mental Health Commission, A. G. 2014. The national review of mental health programmes and services. Sydney: NMHC.Google Scholar
  39. Penfield, C. 2014. Toward a theory of transversal politics: Deleuze and Foucault’s block of becoming. Foucault Studies 17: 134–172.  https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Renold, E., and G. Ivinson. 2014. Horse-girl assemblages: Towards a post-human cartography of girls’ desire in an ex-mining valleys community. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (3): 361–376.Google Scholar
  41. Roberts, G., and J. Boardman. 2013. Understanding ‘recovery’. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 19 (6): 400–409.  https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.112.010355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. St Pierre, E.A. 2004. Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational philosophy and theory 36 (3): 283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. St Pierre, E.A. 2011. Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 611–625. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. St Pierre, E.A. 2013. The posts continue: becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE) 26 (6): 646–657.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. St Pierre, E.A. 2014. A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 30 (2): 2–19.Google Scholar
  46. Ticineto Clough, P. 2009. The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 43–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuck, E., and K.W. Yang. 2014. R-words: Refusing research. In Humanizing research, ed. D. Paris and Maisha T. Winn, 223–247. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Voronka, J. 2016. The politics of ‘peope with lived experience’ experiential authority and the risks of strategic essentialism. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23: 189–201.  https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2016.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voronka, J. 2019. The mental health peer worker as informant: Performing authenticity and the paradoxes of passing. Disability and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1545113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warner, M. 2002. Publics and counterpublics. Public culture 14 (1): 49–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Dalgleish
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heidi Everett
    • 3
  • Cameron Duff
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Youth Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Pathways School, Trinity CollegeThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Schizy Inc.MelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Centre for People, Organisation and WorkRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations