, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 225–245 | Cite as

A critique of new materialism: ethics and ontology

  • Paul RekretEmail author
Original Article


This article seeks to offer a critical assessment of the conception of ethics underlying the growing constellation of ‘new materialist’ social theories. It argues that such theories offer little if any purchase in understanding the contemporary transformations of relations between mind and body or human and non-human natures. Taking as exemplary the work of Jane Bennett, Rosi Braidotti, and Karen Barad, this article asserts that a continuity between ethics and ontology is central to recent theories of ‘materiality’. These theories assert the primacy of matter by calling upon a spiritual or ascetic self-transformation so that one might be ‘attuned to’ or ‘register’ materiality and, conversely, portray critique as hubristic, conceited, or resentful, blinded by its anthropocentrism. It is argued that framing the grounds for ontological speculation in these ethical terms licences the omission of analysis of social forces mediating thought’s access to the world and so grants the theorist leave to sidestep any questions over the conditions of thought. In particular, the essay points to ongoing processes of the so-called primitive accumulation as constituting the relationship between mind and body, human and non-human natures.


materialism posthumanism new materialism anthropocentrism 


  1. Adorno, T. (2003) The Jargon of Authenticity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Amani, B. and Coombe, R.J. (2005) The Human Genome Diversity Project: The politics of patents at the intersection of race, religion, and research ethics. Law and Policy 27(1): 152–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachram, H. (2004) Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nature Socialism 15(4): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balibar, E. (2006) My self and my own: One and the same?. In: B. Maurer and G. Schwab (eds.) Accelerating Possession: Global Futures of Property and Personhood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Balibar, E. (2013) Identity and Difference: John Locke and the Invention of Consciousness. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhandar, B. (2014) Critical legal studies and the politics of property. Property Law Review 3: 186–194.Google Scholar
  8. Bharadwaj, A. (2008) Biosociality and biocrossings: Encounters with assisted conception and embryonic stem cells in India. In: S. Gibbon and C. Novas (eds.) Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, J. (2001) The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Böhm, S. and Dabhi, S. (2009) Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFly Books.Google Scholar
  12. Boyle, J. (2008) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Knowledge Commons. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Cambridge: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Braidotti, R. (2002) Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Braidotti, R. (2006) Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brassier, R. (2011) Concept and objects. In: G. Harman, L. Bryant, N. Srnicek (eds.) The Speculative Turn. Melbourne: Re-Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brand, U. and Gorg, C. (2008) Post-fordist governance of nature: The internationalisation of the state and the case of genetic resources. Review of International Political Economy 15(4): 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, B. (2014) The biopolitics of unwaged digital labor. Triple C 12(2): 464–467.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, W. (2008) Sovereignty and the return of the repressed. In: D. Campbell and M. Schoolman (eds.) The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bryant, L., Harman, G. and Srnicek, N. (eds.) (2011) The Speculative Turn. Melbourne: Re-Press.Google Scholar
  22. Caffentzis, G. (1989) Clipped Coins, Abused Words, and Civil Government: John Locke’s Philosophy of Money. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  23. Caffentzis, G. (2008) John Locke: The Philosopher of Primitive Accumulation. Bristol: Bristol Radical History Group.Google Scholar
  24. Colletti, L. (1972) From Rousseau to Lenin: Studies in Ideology and Society. London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  25. Coole, D. and Frost, S. (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Connolly, W (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democractic Activism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cooper, M. (2007) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  28. Cooper, M. and Waldby, C. (2014) Clinical Labour: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Davis, A. (1982) Women, Race, and Class. Women's Press: London.Google Scholar
  30. Davis, M. (2007) Planet of Slums. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Dickenson, D. (2009) Body Shopping: The Economy Fuelled by Flesh and Blood. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Dolphijn, R. and I. van der Tuin (eds.) (2012) New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dyer-Witherford, N (2015) Cyber-Proletariat. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  34. Federici, S. (2004) Caliban and the Witch: The Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  35. Felski, R. (2000) Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M. (2013) History of Madness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Franklin, S., Lury, C. and Stacey, J. (2000) Global Nature, Global Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Frost, S. (2011) The implications of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology In: H. Grasswick (ed.) Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
  39. Fuchs, C. (2007) Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Goldstein, J. (2013) Terra Economica: Waste and the production of nature. Antipode 45(2): 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grusin, R. (ed.) (2015) The Non-Human Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Heidegger, M. (1993) Basic Writings. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Helmreich, S (2009) Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hemmings, C. (2005) Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies 19(5): 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hemmings, C. (2010) On reading “Transpositions”: A response to Rosi Braidotti’s. Transpositions: on Nomadic Ethics. Subjectivity 3.2: 136–140.Google Scholar
  47. Ince, O.U. (2011) ‘Enclosing in God’s name, accumulation for mankind: Money, morality, and accumulation in John Locke’s theory of property. Review of Politics 73: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jessop, B. (2005) Cultural political economy, the knowledge-based economy, and the state. In: A. Barry and D. Slater (eds.) The Technological Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 144–166.Google Scholar
  49. Johnston, A. (2012) Thinking Big: Toward Grand Neuropolitics - or, Why I am not an Imminent Naturalist or Vital Materialist. In: F Vander Valk (ed.) Essays on Neuroscience and Political Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 156–177.Google Scholar
  50. Katz, C. (1998) Whose nature, whose culture? Private productions of space and the preservation of nature. In: B. Braun and N. Castree (eds.) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  52. Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Lazzarato, M. (1996) Immaterial labour. In: P. Virno and M. Hardt (eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
  54. Leys, R. (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37(3): 434–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Locke, J. (1993) Locke: Political Writings. D. Wooton (ed.), Chicago: Hackett.Google Scholar
  56. Lohmann, L. (2009) Neoliberalism and the calculable world: The rise of carbon trading. In: Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: Mayfly books, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  57. Marx, K. (1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, trans. by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Marx, K. (1993) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, trans. by Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  59. McAfee, K. (2003) Neoliberalism on the molecular scale: Economic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum 34: 203–219.Google Scholar
  60. Meillassoux, Q. (2012a) There is contingent being independent of us, and this contingent being has no reason to be a subject nature. In: Rick Dolphijn and Iris van der Tuin, New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  61. Meillassoux, Q. (2012b) Iteration, reiteration, repetition: A speculative analysis of the meaningless sign. Paper delivered to the Freie Universitat Berlin, April 2012 [available at]. Accessed 08/09/2014.  
  62. Mies, M. (1998) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women and the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  63. Mirowski, P. (2011) Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murphy, M. (2008) Chemical regimes of life. Journal of Environmental History 13(4): 695–703.Google Scholar
  65. Neocleous, M. (2011) War on waste: Law, Original accumulation and the violence of capital. Science and Society 75(4): 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Noys, B. (2011) The Discrete Charm of Bruno Latour, or the Critique of “Anti-Critique”. Paper presented to the Centre for Critical Theory, University of Nottingham, December 8, 2011. [] Accessed 31/10/2015.
  67. Noys, B. (2012) The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Parry, B. (2004) Trading the Genome. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Pels, D. (1999) On the strangeness of intellectuals and the intellectuality of strangers. Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prasad, A. (2009) ‘Capitalizing disease: Biopolitics of drug trials in India’. Theory, Culture & Society 26(5): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rajan, K.S. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Post-Genomic Life. London and Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rajan, K.S. (2012) Pharmaceutical crises and questions of value: Terrains and logics of global therapeutic politics. South Atlantic Quarterly 111(2): 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rekret, P. (forthcoming) New materialisms and the politics of knowledge. Theory, Culture and Society in press.Google Scholar
  74. Rekret, P. and Choat, S. (2015) From political topographies to political logics: Post-marxism and historicity. Constellations: A Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, advance publication 4 December, 2015, doi:  10.1111/1467-8675.12199.
  75. Rekret, P. (2012) The impasse of post-metaphysical political theory: On Derrida and Foucault. Telos 161: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rose, M. (1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rose, H and Rose, S. (2014) Genes, Cells and Brains: The Promethean Promises of the New Biotechnology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  78. Schiller, D. (2000) Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  79. Schiller, D. (2007) How to Think About Information. Urbana and Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  80. Schmidt, A. (1971) The Concept of Nature in Marx. (Ben Fowkes, Trans.). London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, N. (2007) Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register. 43: 16–36.Google Scholar
  82. Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978) Intellectual and Manual Labor: A Critique of Epistemology. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sourbut, E. (1997) Reproductive technologies and lesbian parents: An unnatural alliance. In: M. Maynard (ed.) Science and the Construction of Women London: University College Press.Google Scholar
  84. Terranova, T. (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age (Vol. 23, p. 25). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  85. Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  86. Thrift, N. (2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.   Google Scholar
  87. Toscano, A. (2008) The culture of abstraction. Theory, Culture and Society 25(4): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thacker E (2005) The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics and Culture. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  89. Virno, P. (2003) A Grammar of the Multitude. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext (e).Google Scholar
  90. Waldby, C. (2002) Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6(3): 305–323.  Google Scholar
  91. Waldby, C. and Mitchell, T. (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. London and Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Whatmore, S. (2002) Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  93. White, H. (2013) Materiality, form, and context: Marx contra Latour. Victorian Studies 55(4): 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Williams, R. (1980) ‘Ideas of Nature’, Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  95. Wood, E.M. (2002), The Origins of Capitalism: A Longer View. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  96. Zeller, C. (2008) From the gene to the globe: extracting rents based on intellectual property monopolies. Review of International Political Economy 15(1): 86–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Richmond, American International UniversitySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations