Was it autoethnography? The classificatory, confessional and mad politics of lived experience in sociological research
This paper will consider the history and politics of autoethnography in relation to the activist scholarship of Mad Studies. As part of ethnographic research about ‘recovery in/from serious mental health problems’ in the UK, I accessed an NHS community “arts for mental health” service as a service-user would do, situating this data in broader socio-political debates concerning the meaning, management and lived experience of madness and distress. This paper examines the framing of this research as autoethnographic and the relationship of personal and/or lived experience to the knowledge produced. I explore the classificatory, confessional and Mad politics of experience, identity and identification, and embodiment for research subjectivities. Employing autoethnographic means, I consider the ways in which I situate myself, and am situated by others, in relation to my research, evaluating the methodological implications of the crisis of representation in anthropology, and the post-structuralist criticism of identity politics. Through an engagement Mad Studies, I seek to move beyond these two established responses to the use of personal experience and autobiography in research.
KeywordsAutoethnography Experience Mad studies Ethics Qualitative methods Social inequalities
- Allison, D. 1996. Two or Three Things I Know for Sure. New York: PLUME.Google Scholar
- Beresford, P. 2004. Madness, Distress, Research and a Social Model. In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, ed. C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 208–222. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
- Beresford, P., and J. Russo. 2016. Supporting the Sustainability of Mad Studies and Preventing Its Co-option. Disability & Society 31 (2): 270–274.Google Scholar
- Blackman, L., J. Cromby, D. Hook, D. Papadopoulos, and V. Walkerdine. 2008. Creating Subjectivities. International Journal of Critical Psychology 22 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
- Church, K. 1995. Forbidden Narratives: Critical Autobiography as Social Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Church, Kathryn, and Danielle Landry. 2013. Mad Positive in the Academy. Online course, https://www.ryerson.ca/ds/madpositive/, Accessed 6 December 2018.
- Clifford, J., and G. E. Marcus (eds.). 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University California Press.Google Scholar
- Diamond, S. 2013. What Makes us a Community? In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, ed. B.A. LeFrancois, R.J. Menzies and G. Reaume, 64–78. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
- Geertz, Clifford. 1996. After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist (New Edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gorman, R., Saini, A. Tam, L., Udegbe, O. and Usar, O. 2013. Mad People of Color: A Manifesto. Asylum Magazine 2013.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM. Feminism and Technoscience. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jones, H., S. Linn, T.E. Adams, and C. Ellis (eds.). 2015. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- LeFrançois, B.A., P. Beresford, and J. Russo. 2016. Editorial: Destination Mad Studies. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice 5 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar
- LeFrancois, B.A., R.J. Menzies, and G. Reaume. 2013. Mad Matters : A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
- McWade, B. 2018. Madness, Violence and Media. In Madness, Violence And Power: A Radical Anthology, ed. A. Daley, L. Costa, and P. Beresford. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- McWade, B. 2016a. Recovery-as-policy as a Form of Neoliberal State Making. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice 5 (3): 62–81.Google Scholar
- McWade, B. 2016b. Two years of Mad Studies Organising in the UK. Asylum Magazine 23.4, http://asylummagazine.org/2016/12/what-a-difference-a-couple-of-years-makes-by-brigit-mcwade/, Accessed 6 December 2018.
- McWade, B. 2015. Temporalities of Mental Health Recovery. Subjectivity 8 (3): 243–260.Google Scholar
- Metzl, J. 2009. The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Moser, I. 2008. Making Alzheimer’s Disease Matter. Enacting, Interfering and Doing Politics of Nature. Geoforum, Environmental Economic Geography 39 (1): 98–110.Google Scholar
- Perry, E. 2016. Reclaiming, Challenging and Reviving Mental Health Survivor Research. https://www.thesociologicalreview.com/blog/reclaiming-challenging-and-reviving-mental-health-survivor-research.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2019.
- Psychiatric Disabilities Anti-violence Coalition. 2015. Clearing a Path: A Psychiatric Survivor Anti-violence Framework. Toronto: The Empowerment Council. https://www.academia.edu/20268560/Clearing_a_Path_A_Psychiatric_Survivor_Anti-Violence_Framework, accessed 6 December 2018.
- Russo, J. 2016b. Towards Our Own Framework, or Reclaiming Madness Part Two. In Searching for a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies, ed. J. Russo and A. Sweeney, 59–68. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
- Ryan-Flood, R., and R. Gill (eds.). 2009. Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. W. 1992. “Experience”. In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. J. Butler and J. W. Scott, 22–40. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sedgwick, P. 1982. Psycho Politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Sweeney, A., P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, and D. Rose (eds.). 2009. This is Survivor Research. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
- Voronka, J. (in press) Storytelling through the psychiatric gaze: Resisting resilience and recovery narratives. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies.Google Scholar