Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 156–171 | Cite as

The changing place of care and compassion within the English NHS: an Eliasean perspective

  • Ruben FloresEmail author
  • Patrick Brown
Original Article

Abstract

In the wake of the Francis Report, a public conversation has arisen in England about the place of compassion within healthcare settings, particularly regarding the causes of failures in the provision of adequate healthcare, and the desirability and possibility of fostering compassion in the NHS. A contribution to this conversation, this article takes as a starting point an oft-overlooked socio-historical phenomenon: social expectations of compassion in healthcare practice have shifted in comparison to what was the case at the NHS’s inception in 1948, so that both healthcare professionals and the public have come to perceive and expect compassion as an intrinsic component of healthcare. We argue that this expectation can be partly explained drawing on Elias’s concept of ‘functional democratisation’: as power asymmetries between different social groups (e.g. doctors and patients) have declined in recent decades, so have norms and expectations of compassionate care increased. Failures to provide compassionate care in some specific settings can also be partly understood as an outcome of a wider erosion of functional democratisation resulting from the growth in social inequality witnessed in England and much of the world since the 1970s. We thus call for addressing failures of care within healthcare settings through broader social policies.

Keywords

Francis Report Functional democratisation Functional de-democratisation Inequality Norbert Elias Process sociology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Iain Wilkinson and two anonymous referees for their very constructive comments, feedback and suggestions on earlier versions of this article. Our work with, and insights from, Andy Alaszewski (on historical perspectives), Stephen Mennell and Rineke van Daalen (on Eliasian approaches) have been important influences behind this work. Of course any weakness are solely attributed to ourselves.

References

  1. Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bevan, G., and C. Hood. 2006. What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public healthcare system. Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blendon, R.J., and J.M. Benson, 2017. Public opinion about the future of the affordable care act. New England Journal of Medicine 377 (9): e12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1710032.
  4. Bowling, A. 1999. Ageism in cardiology. British Medical Journal 319: 1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, D., and M. Harris. 2009. The challenge of co-production. London: Nesta Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P. 2011. The concept of lifeworld as a tool in analysing health-care work: Exploring professionals’ resistance to governance through subjectivity, norms and experiential knowledge. Social Theory and Health 9 (2): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, P., and R. Flores. 2011. Making normative structures visible: The British National Health Service and the hospice movement as signifiers of compassion and hope. Acta Sociologica 54 (1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, P., A. Alaszewski, T. Swift, and A. Nordin. 2011. Actions speak louder than words: The embodiment of trust by healthcare professionals in gynae-oncology. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (2): 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, P., M.A. Elston, and J. Gabe. 2015. From patient deference towards negotiated and precarious informality: An Eliasian analysis of English general practitioners’ understandings of changing patient relations. Social Science and Medicine 146: 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, I., and M. Drakeford. 2005. Scandal, social policy and social welfare. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, D. 2013. Mid Staffs hospital scandal: The essential guide. The Guardian, February 6. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/06/mid-staffs-hospital-scandal-guide.
  12. Castel, R. 1991. From dangerousness to risk. In The foucault effect—Studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 281–298. Harvester Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, C. 1997. Misery and company: Sympathy in everyday life. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke, H. 2006. Seagull management and the control of nursing work. Work, Employment & Society 20 (2): 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Swaan, A. 1981. The politics of agoraphobia. Theory and Society 10 (3): 359–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Swaan, A. 1988. In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Swaan, A. 1995. Widening circles of identification: Emotional concerns in sociogenetic perspective. Theory, Culture & Society 12 (2): 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Zulueta, P. 2013a. Compassion in healthcare. Clinical Ethics 8 (4): 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Zulueta, P. 2013b. Compassion in 21st century medicine: Is it sustainable? Clinical Ethics 8 (4): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Department of Health. 2001. National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  21. Dingwall, R., and D. Allen. 2001. The implications of healthcare reforms for the profession of nursing. Nursing Inquiry 8 (2): 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunning, E., and J. Hughes. 2013. Norbert Elias and modern sociology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. Elias, N. 1996. The Germans: Power struggles and the development of habitus in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Elias, N. 1978. The civilising process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Elias, N. 2000 [1939]. The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Elias, N., and J. Scotson. 2008. The established and the outsiders. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, P., and V. Byrne. 2012. Identity, emotion and the internal goods of practice: A study of learning disability professionals. Sociology of Health & Illness 34 (1): 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flores, R. 2013. When charity does not begin at home: Exploring the British socioemotional economy of compassion. Sociological Research Online 18(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/18/1/17.html.
  29. Flynn, R. 2002. Clinical governance and governmentality. Health, Risk and Society 4 (2): 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Francis, R. 2013. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive summary. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  32. Gillon, R. 2013. Restoring humanity in health and social care—Some suggestions. Clinical Ethics 8 (4): 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  34. Graeber, D. 2015. The Utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
  35. Greenhalgh, T. 2013. The compassionate organisation. British Journal of General Practice 63 (614): 481. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halligan, A. 2013. The Francis report: What you permit, you promote (Editorial). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 106: 116–117. doi: 10.1177/0141076813484109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamilton, M. 2014. The new social contract and the individualisation of risk in policy. Journal of Risk Research 17 (4): 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochschild, A. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hochschild, A. 2012. The outsourced self: Intimate life in market times. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  40. Hood, C. 2012. Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: Two hypotheses. Public Administration Review 72: S85–S92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hordern, J. 2013. What’s wrong with ‘compassion’? Towards a political, philosophical and theological context. Clinical Ethics 8 (4): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunt, J. 2015. Francis report: Update and response. Oral address to parliament. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/francis-report-update-and-response. Accessed 18 Apr 2016.
  43. Jarman, B. 2012. When managers rule. British Medical Journal 345: e8239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jeffreys, M. 2000. Recollections of the pioneers of the geriatric medicine specialty. In Oral history, health and welfare, ed. J. Bornat, R. Perks, P. Thompson, and J. Walmsley, 75–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Jolley, J., and L. Shields. 2009. The evolution of family-centered care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 24 (2): 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Judt, T. 2011. Ill fares the land: A treatise on our present discontents. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  47. Khullar, D. 2015. The importance of sitting with patients, Well (New York Times Blog), March 19. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/the-importance-of-sitting-with-patients/.
  48. Lown, B., J. Rosen, and J. Marttila. 2011. An agenda for improving compassionate care: A survey shows about half of patients say such care is missing. Health Affairs 30 (9): 1772–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Madan, A. 2017. Sustainability and transformation plans: Transforming patient care through GP services (Blog). NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog/stp-blog/. Accessed: 1 June 2017.
  50. McDonald, R., and S. Harrison. 2004. The micropolitics of clinical guidelines: An empirical study. Policy and Politics 32 (2): 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Menchik, D.A. 2014. Simmel’s dynamic social medicine: New questions for studying medical institutions? Social Science and Medicine 107: 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mennell, S. 1990. Decivilising processes: Theoretical significance and some lines of research. International Sociology 5 (2): 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mennell, S. 2004. Not so exceptional? State-formation processes in America. In The sociology of Norbert Elias, ed. S. Loyal, and S. Quilley, 157–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mennell, S. 2007. The American civilizing process. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  55. Menzies Lyth, I. 1960. Social systems as a defense against anxiety: an empirical study of a nursing service in a general hospital. Human Relations 13: 95–121.Google Scholar
  56. Meštrović, S.G. 1997. Postemotional society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Nussbaum, M.C. 2001. Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. 2011. Care and compassion? Report of the Health Service Ombudsman into ten investigations into NHS care of older people. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  59. Pence, G. 1983. Can compassion be taught? Journal of Medical Ethics 9: 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raghuram, P., J. Bornat., and L. Henry. 2011. The co-marking of aged bodies and migrant bodies: migrant workers’ contribution to geriatric medicine in the UK. Sociology of Health and Illness 33 (2): 321–335.Google Scholar
  61. Rodger, J. 2003. Social solidarity, welfare and post-emotionalism. Journal of Social Policy 32 (3): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodger, J. 2012. Loic Wacquant and Norbert Elias: Advanced marginality and the theory of the de-civilising process. In Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Exploring the work of Loic Wacquant, ed. P. Squires, and J. Lea, 87–106. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rohloff, A. 2008. Moral panics as decivilizing processes: Towards an Eliasian approach. New Zealand Sociology 23 (1): 66–76.Google Scholar
  64. Roter, D.L., R.M. Frankel, J.A. Hall, and D. Sluyter. 2006. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21: S28–S34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions—Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schei, E. 2006. Doctoring as leadership: The power to heal. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 49 (3): 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sennett, R. 1998. The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  68. Smajdor, A. 2013. Reification and compassion in medicine: A tale of two systems. Clinical Ethics 8 (4): 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor-Gooby, P. 2013. Why do people stigmatise the poor at a time of rapidly increasing inequality, and what can be done about it? The Political Quarterly 84 (1): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tonkens, E. 2012. Working with Arlie Hochschild: Connecting feelings to social change. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19 (2): 194–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Townsend, P. 2010. The political sociology of mental handicap. In The Peter Townsend Reader, ed. A. Walker, D. Gordon, R. Levitas, P. Phillimore, C. Philipson, M. Saloman, and N. Yeates, 528–538. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  72. van Dantzig, A., and A. de Swaan. 1978. Omgaan met angst in een kankerziekenhuis. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
  73. Wacquant, L. 2010. Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity. Sociological Forum 25 (2): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Waring, J. 2007. Adaptive regulation or governmentality: Patient safety and the changing regulation of medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (2): 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wood, H. 2013. Mid Staffs is evidence of all that is wrong with NHS management. British Medical Journal 346: 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wouters, C. 1989. The sociology of emotions and flight attendants: Hochschild’s managed heart. Theory, Culture and Society 6: 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wouters, C. 2007. Informalisation: Manners and emotions since 1890. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Wouters, C. 2014. Universally applicable criteria for doing figurational process sociology: Seven balances, one triad. Human Figurations: Long-term Perspectives on the Human Condition 3(1). Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0003.106.
  79. Wouters, C. 2016. Functional democratisation and disintegration as side-effects of differentiation and integration processes. Human Figurations: Long-term Perspectives on the Human Condition 5(2). Social character, historical processes. Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0005.208.
  80. Wright, O., and J. Laurance. 2013. NHS's darkest day. In The Independent, 7 February.Google Scholar
  81. Young, J. 1999. The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations