Advertisement

Exploring the practices of steal-to-order burglars: a different brand of offender?

  • Nicholas AddisEmail author
  • Andrew Evans
  • Nicolas Malleson
Original Article

Abstract

This research helps shed light on the largely overlooked practices amongst steal-to-order offenders, with a view to identifying ways in which steal-to-order offences may be disrupted through targeted intervention. Interviews were conducted with a sample of incarcerated burglars who have previously engaged in steal-to-order offences. In addition to highlighting a number of parallels between steal-to-order and non-steal-to-order offences, this paper illustrates the nature of professionalism exhibited by offenders during steal-to-order offences. Moreover, this paper reveals a behavioural continuum amongst offenders engaging in steal-to-order offences: those who steal-to-offer, those who steal-to-order more general items, and those who steal-to-order more specialist goods. The paper also highlights the potential lack of flexibility experienced by steal-to-order offenders, and the implications of this in challenging criminological theory of offender decision making. The paper concludes by discussing how steps at both a residential and organisational level may be taken to effectively disrupt the practices of offenders during steal-to-order offences.

Keywords

Burglary Steal-to-order Stolen goods Crime prevention Modus operandi 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported through an ‘Innovations in Quantitative Methods’ Scholarship from the University of Leeds. The authors are grateful to Professor David Best, Dr James Banks, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks are also extended to HM Prison Service for enabling access to the offenders in this study, and, in particular, to the staff and prisoners who gave their valuable time in order to support this work.

References

  1. Altheide, D.L., and C.J. Schneider. 2013. Qualitative Media Analysis, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, R. 2006. Predicting and Preventing: Developing a Risk Assessment Mechanism for Residential Housing. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 8 (3): 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AskMID.com. 2018. Welcome to the askMID website. Motor Insurance Database, http://www.askmid.com/. Accessed July 2018.
  4. Bennett, T., and R. Wright. 1984. Burglars on Burglary. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  5. Bernasco, W. 2008. Them Again? Same-Offender Involvement in Repeat and Near Repeat Burglaries. European Journal of Criminology 5 (4): 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, Paths and Edges: Considerations on the Complexity of Crime and the Physical Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clare, J. 2011. Examination of Systematic Variations in Burglars’ Domain-Specific Perceptual and Procedural Skills. Psychology Crime & Law 17 (3): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, R.V. 1999. Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods. Policing and Reducing Crime Unit Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, R.V., and D.B. Cornish. 1985. Modeling Offenders’ Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy. Crime and Justice 6: 147–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cromwell, P.F., and J.N. Olson. 2005. The Reasoning Burglar: Motives and Decision-Making Strategies. In In Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime (An Anthology), 4th ed, ed. P. Cromwell, 42–56. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Cromwell, P.F., J.N. Olson, and D.W. Avary. 1991a. Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Studies in Crime, Law and Justice Volume 8. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Cromwell, P.F., J.N. Olson, D.W. Avary, and A. Marks. 1991b. How Drugs Affect Decisions by Burglars. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 35 (4): 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Haan, W., and J. Vos. 2003. A Crying Shame: The Over-Rationalized Conception of Man in the Rational Choice Perspective. Theoretical Criminology 7 (1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elffers, H. 2010. Misinformation, Misunderstanding and Misleading as Validity Threats to Offenders’ Accounts of Offending. In Offenders on Offending: Learning about crime from criminals, ed. W. Bernasco, 13–22. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Ekblom, P., and N. Tilley. 2000. Going Equipped: Criminology, Situational Crime Prevention and the Resourceful Offender. British Journal of Criminology 40 (3): 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox, B.H., and D.P. Farrington. 2012. Creating Burglary Profiles Using Latent Class Analysis: A New Approach to Offender Profiling. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39 (12): 1582–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levesley, T., G. Braun, M. Wilkinson, and C. Powell. 2004. Emerging Methods of Car TheftTheft of Keys. Home Office Findings 239. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  19. Maguire, E.M.W., and T. Bennett. 1982. Burglary in a Dwelling: The Offence, the Offender and the Victim. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  20. Markson, L., J. Woodhams, and J.W. Bond. 2010. Linking Serial Residential Burglary: Comparing the Utility of Modus Operandi Behaviours, Geographical Proximity, and Temporal Proximity. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 7 (2): 91–107.Google Scholar
  21. Nee, C. 2015. Understanding Expertise in Burglars: From Pre-conscious Scanning to Action and Beyond. Aggression and Violent Behavior 20: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nee, C., and A. Meenaghan. 2006. Expert Decision Making in Burglars. British Journal of Criminology 46 (5): 935–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nee, C., and M. Taylor. 1988. Residential Burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A Situational Perspective. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 27 (2): 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Police.uk. 2018. Automatic Number Plate Recognition. Police.uk website, https://www.police.uk/information-and-advice/automatic-number-plate-recognition/. Accessed July 2018.
  25. Sanders, A.N., J.B. Kuhns, and K.R. Blevins. 2017. Exploring and Understanding Differences between Deliberate and Impulsive Male and Female Burglars. Crime & Delinquency 63 (12): 1547–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider, J. 2005. Stolen Goods Markets: Methods of Disposal. British Journal of Criminology 45 (2): 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sentencing Council. 2011. A short guide - Sentencing for offences taken into consideration (TICs), https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/public_guide_tics_for_web.pdf, Accessed August 2018.
  28. Shaw, O., N. Morgan, I. Mineva, J. Hoare, and R. Stevenson. 2015. Crime and the Value of Stolen Goods. Research Report 81. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  29. Shaw, S.E., L.L. Smith, and J.W. Bond. 2010. Examining the Factors that Differentiate a Car Key Burglary from a Regular Domestic Burglary. International Journal of Police Science and Management 12 (3): 450–459.Google Scholar
  30. Shover, N. 1973. The Social Organization of Burglary. Social Problems 20 (4): 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevenson, R., and L. Forsythe. 1998. The Stolen Goods Market in New South Wales: An Interview Study with Imprisoned Burglars. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  32. Sutton, M. 1998. Handling Stolen Goods and Theft: A Market Reduction Approach. Home Office Research Study 178. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  33. Sutton, M. 2003. How Burglars and Shoplifters Sell Stolen Goods in Derby: Describing and Understanding the Local Illicit Markets. Derby: Derby Community Safety Partnership.Google Scholar
  34. Sutton, M. 2008. How Prolific Thieves Sell Stolen Goods: Describing, Understanding, and Tackling the Local Markets in Mansfield and Nottingham: A Market Reduction Approach Study. Internet Journal of Criminology, https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b93dd4_8d5e20eeba8249d6831917733362afcc.pdf. Accessed July 2018.
  35. Sutton, M. 2010. Stolen Goods Markets. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Problem-Specific Guides Series Guide No. 57. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  36. Sutton, M., J. Schneider, and S. Hetherington. 2001. Tackling Theft with the Market Reduction Approach. Home Office Crime Reduction Research Series Paper No. 8. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, E. 2014. Honour Among Thieves? How Morality and Rationality Influence the Decision-Making Processes of Convicted Domestic Burglars. Criminology & Criminal Justice 14 (4): 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The Yorkshire Post. 2009. Gang jailed for £600,000 car raids on homes. 28 March 2009, https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/gang-jailed-for-163-600-000-car-raids-on-homes-1-2340404, Accessed January 2019.
  39. Theft Act. 1968. Elizabeth II. Chapter 60, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60. Accessed July 2018.  
  40. Townsley, M., D. Birks, W. Bernasco, S. Ruiter, S.D. Johnson, G. White, and S. Baum. 2015. Burglar Target Selection: A Cross-national Comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 52 (1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vandeviver, C., T. Neutens, S. van Daele, D. Geurts, and T. Vander Beken. 2015. A Discrete Spatial Choice Model of Burglary Target Selection at the House-Level. Applied Geography 64: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vaughn, M.G., M. Delisi, K.M. Beaver, and M.O. Howard. 2008. Toward a Quantitative Typology of Burglars: A Latent Profile Analysis of Career Offenders. Journal of Forensic Science 53 (6): 1387–1392.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, R., and S. Decker. 1994. Burglars on the Job. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, R., R.H. Logie, and S.H. Decker. 1995. Criminal Expertise and Offender Decision Making: An Experimental Study of the Target Selection Process in Residential Burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32 (1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Addis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew Evans
    • 2
  • Nicolas Malleson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Law and CriminologySheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  2. 2.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations