Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Domestic extremist criminal damage events: behaving like criminals or terrorists?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Property damage is a ubiquitous criminal direct action tactic perpetrated by left-wing extremists in Bristol to advance a variety of causes, yet it remains understudied. This study uniquely contributes to the field by analysing the selection of targets for property damage by left-wing extremists in the British town of Bristol. Using police data and online claims of responsibility, this study analyses a number of situational factors providing guardianship at the target locations of 95 Domestic Extremism incidents and compares them with 95 conventional property damage incidents. The results suggest that left-wing extremists do not behave in the same manner as conventional criminals as they fail to conform to theoretical expectations regarding the effect of guardianship on target selection decisions. Instead, Domestic Extremists appear to adhere to decision-making schemas more commonly associated with terrorists. This raises important questions about the relevance and usefulness of these theoretical frameworks for understanding Domestic Extremism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Counter Terrorism Security Office (NaCTSO) is part of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). It supports the Protect and Prepare strands of the UK counter terrorism strategy (CONTEST).

  2. The ‘Research Randomizer’ random sampling and assignment tool is available from: http://www.randomizer.org/.

  3. This study analyses n = 95 DE property damage incidents over 4 years.

References

  • ACPO. 2013. NCDE National Co-ordinator Domestic Extremism [WWW] Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). http://www.acpo.police.uk/NationalPolicing/NCDENationalCoordinatorDomesticExtremsim.html. Accessed 05 Oct 2013.

  • Anonymous. 2013a. Bristol City Council Mobile CCTV Vans Attacked [WWW] Indymedia UK. http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2013/12/514042.html. Accessed 30 Aug 13.

  • Anonymous. 2011b. Banks Smashed in Bristol [WWW] Indymedia UK. http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/06/480322.html. Accessed 30 Aug 13.

  • Anonymous. 2011c. Banks and Tesco’s Smashed, Bristol (UK) [WWW] Act For Freedom Now! http://actforfreedomnow.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/bank-and-tescos-smashed-bristol-uk/. Accessed 03 Jan 14.

  • Anonymous. 2014d. Gross Misconduct and the Guerilla Massive: Poems and Lunacy from Bristol [WWW] NoState325. http://325.nostate.net/?p=9754. Accessed 05 Mar 14.

  • Borum, Randy, and Chuck Tilby. 2005. Anarchist Direct Actions: A Challenge for Law Enforcement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28 (3): 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, Paul, and Patricia Brantingham. 2008. Crime pattern theory. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, ed. Richard Wortley and Lorraine Mazerolle, 78–93. Willan: Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan. 2008. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Bryan. 2006. Terrorism: The Relevance of the Rational Choice Model. Public Choice 128 (1–2): 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channel 4. 2015. https://www.channel4.com/news/terrorism-which-cities-are-most-at-risk.

  • Clarke, Roland V. 2008. Situational crime prevention. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, ed. Richard Wortley and Lorraine Mazerolle, 178–194. Willan: Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Roland V. 2013. Seven Misconceptions of Situational Crime Prevention. In Handbook of Crime Prevention Community Safety, ed. Nick Tilley, 39–70. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Roland V., and Graeme R. Newman. 2006. Outsmarting the Terrorists. London: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D.B., and R.V. Clarke. 2003. Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply toWortley's critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 16: 41–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, Derek B., and Roland V. Clarke. 2008. The rational choice perspective. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, ed. Richard Wortley and Lorraine Mazerolle, 21–47. Willan: Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, Mario. 2005. Cities in the World: Local Civil Society and Global Issues in Britain. In Transnational Protest and Global Activists, ed. Donatella Della Porta and Sidney Tarrow, 45–71. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Brian, Alexandra Plows, and Derek Wall. 2003. The Preferred Way of doing Things: The British Direct Action Movement. Parliamentary Affairs 56: 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, Marcus, and Rachel Boba. 2010. Crime and Everyday Life, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, B. 2003. ‘Direct Action Ethic’, Anarchist Studies, Vol. 1, 13–14. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/3036/1/Direct_action_ethic.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 13.

  • Fussey, Pete. 2011. An Economy of Choice? Terrorist Decision-Making and Criminological Rational Choice Theories Reconsidered. Security Journal 24: 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Ronnie. 2004. Tree huggers with Hand Grenades? Law Enforcement Technology, 88–95.

  • Gill, Paul, Marchment, Zoe, Corner, Emily, and Bouhana, Noémie. 2018. Terrorist decision making in the context of risk, attack planning, and attack commission. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1445501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Uri. 2007. Anarchism reloaded. Journal of Political Ideologies 12 (1): 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HMIC. 2012. A Review of National Police Units Which Provide Intelligence on Criminality Associated with Protest. http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/publication/review-of-national-police-units-which-provide-intelligence-on-criminality-associated-with-protest-20120202/. Accessed 05 Oct 13.

  • Hollis, Meghan E., Marcus Felson, and Brandon C. Welsh. 2013. The Capable Guardian in Routine Activities Theory: A Theoretical and Conceptual Reappraisal. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 15 (1): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis-Peel, Meghan E., Danielle M. Reynald, Maud Van Bavel, Henk Elffers, and Brandon C. Welsh. 2011. Guardianship for Crime Prevention: A Critical Review of the Literature. Crime, Law and Social Change 56 (1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. Joop, and Hennie R. Boeije. 2005. Data collection, primary versus secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement 1 (1): 593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Improvised Guerilla Formation. 2013. Barclays Bank Firebombed in Bristol—Statement and Reflection by a FAI Group [WWW] Bristol Indymedia. http://bristol.indymedia.org.uk/article/766092. Accessed 30 Aug 13.

  • Kinna, Ruth. 2005. A Beginner’s Guide. Anarchism. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange, Teresa C. 1999. The Impact of Neighborhoods, Schools, and Malls on the Spatial Distribution of Property Damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 36: 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchment, Zoe, Noemie Bouhana, and Paul Gill. 2018. Lone Actor Terrorists: A Residence-to-Crime Approach. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1481050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. 2015. Bristol Activist Jailed For Two Years for Targeting Police Cars With Tyre Spikes. The Guardian 24 February, 2015.

  • MI5. 2013. Domestic Extremism [WWW] Security Service MI5. http://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/the-threats/terrorism/domestic-extremism.html. Accessed 05 Oct 13.

  • National Counter Terrorism Security Office (NaCTSO). 2009. Counter Terrorism Protective Security Advice for Higher and Further Education.

  • Newton, Andrew D., and Kate J. Bowers. 2007. The Geography of Bus Shelter Damage: The Influence of Crime, Neighbourhood Characteristics and Land-Use. Internet Journal of Criminology. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b93dd4_7636765b8f164ad5b257c68f244a9f40.pdf.

  • Purdue, D., M. Diani, and I. Lindsay. 2004. Civic Networks in Bristol and Glasgow. Community Development Journal 39 (3): 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, Jason, Paul Ekblom, and Richard Flynn. 2005. The Conjunction of Terrorist Opportunity: A Framework for Diagnosing and Preventing Acts of Terrorism. Security Journal 18 (3): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, B., E. Bakker, P. Gill, and N. Bouhana. 2018. Lone Actor Terrorist Attack Planning and Preparation: A Data-Driven Analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences 63 (4): 1191–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staniforth, Andrew. 2009. Dangerous Liaisons: Domestic Extremists. Police Review, 28–29.

  • Tewksbury, Richard, and Elizabeth Ehrhardt Mustaine. 2000. Routine Activities and Vandalism: A Theoretical and Empirical Study. Journal of Crime and Justice 23 (1): 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Lampe, Klaus. 2011. The Application of the Framework of Situational Crime Prevention to ‘Organized Crime’. Criminology & Criminal Justice 11 (2): 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, Derek. 1999. Earth First! And the Anti-Roads Movement: Radical Environmentalism and Comparative Social Movements. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Brandon C., Mark E. Mudge, and David P. Farrington. 2010. Reconceptualizing Public Area Surveillance and Crime Prevention: Security Guards, Place Managers and Defensible Space. Security Journal 23 (4): 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Pamela, Tamara D. Madensen, and Marie Skubak Tillyer. 2007. Guardianship in Context: Implications for Burglary Victimization Risk and Prevention. Criminology 45 (4): 771–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from The European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 758834).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK

    Arlene Robinson, Zoe Marchment & Paul Gill

Authors
  1. Arlene Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zoe Marchment
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Gill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robinson, A., Marchment, Z. & Gill, P. Domestic extremist criminal damage events: behaving like criminals or terrorists?. Secur J 32, 153–167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-018-0153-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-018-0153-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation