Advertisement

Do sports stadiums generate crime on days without matches? A natural experiment on the delayed exploitation of criminal opportunities

  • Christophe Vandeviver
  • Wim Bernasco
  • Stijn Van Daele
Original Article

Abstract

Crime pattern theory claims that busy places generate crime through immediate and delayed exploitation. In delayed exploitation, offenders notice criminal opportunities during opening hours but return to exploit them later. This study investigates delayed exploitation by testing whether soccer stadiums locally increase police-recorded property crime on non-game days. A soccer stadium closure created a natural experiment. We estimate linear regression difference-in-difference models to compare crime rates on non-game days around the stadium, before and after the closure. The closure reduced non-game day property crime beyond the citywide property crime drop. We conclude that criminogenic effects of busy places extend beyond their opening hours, confirming the delayed exploitation mechanism and that crime-prevention strategies should also target these places outside opening hours.

Keywords

Crime pattern theory Crime generators Property crime Crime hot spot Soccer stadium 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Christophe Vandeviver is a postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO). Part of this work was carried out while Christophe Vandeviver was an International Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR).

Funding

Christophe Vandeviver’s contribution to this study was funded by the Research Foundation’s – Flanders (FWO) Postdoctoral Fellowship funding scheme and the Research Foundation’s – Flanders (FWO) Long Stay Abroad funding scheme [FWO15/PDO/242 to C.V., V4.303.16 N to C.V.].

References

  1. Bernasco, W. 2010. A Sentimental Journey to Crime: Effects of Residential History on Crime Location Choice. Criminology 48: 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernasco, W., and T. Kooistra. 2010. Effects of Residential History on Commercial Robbers’ Crime Location Choices. European Journal of Criminology 7: 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernasco, W., and F. Luykx. 2003. Effects of Attractiveness, Opportunity and Accesibility to Burglars on Residential Burglary Rates of Urban Neighborhoods. Criminology 41: 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 1984. Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 2003. Anticipating the Displacement of Crime Using the Principles of Environmental Criminology. In Crime Prevention Studies, ed. M.J. Smith, and D.B. Cornish. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 2008. Crime Pattern Theory. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, ed. R. Wortley, L. Mazerolle, and S. Rombouts. Willan: Cullompton.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1981. Notes on the Geometry of Crime. In Environmental Criminology, ed. P.J. Brantingham and P.L. Brantingham. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, Paths and Edges: Considerations on the Complexity of Crime and the Physical Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1995. Criminality of Place: Crime Generators and Crime Attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 3: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breetzke, G.D., and E.G. Cohn. 2013. Sporting Events and the Spatial Patterning of Crime in South Africa: Local Interpretations and International Implications. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 55: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bromley, R.D.F., and A.L. Nelson. 2002. Alcohol-related crime and disorder across urban space and time: evidence from a British city. Geoforum 33: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ceccato, V., and A.C. Uittenbogaard. 2014. Space-Time Dynamics of Crime in Transport Nodes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104: 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. City of Ghent. 2017. Gent in Cijfers en in Kaart [Online]. Ghent: City of Ghent. https://stad.gent/over-gent-en-het-stadsbestuur/over-gent/kaarten-cijfers-en-data/gent-cijfers-en-kaart. Accessed 6 Nov 2017
  14. Cromwell, P., J. Olson, and D.A.W. Avary. 1991. Breaking and Entering: An Etnographic Analysis of Burglary. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Cromwell, P., J. Olson, and D.A.W. Avary. 1999. Decision Strategies of Residential Burglars. In In Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime, ed. P. Cromwell. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  16. De Jonghe, T. 2008. The market potential of a club as an indicator for the size of a new relocated football arena: The case KAA Gent. Belgeo 2: 193–216.Google Scholar
  17. Eck, J.E., and D.L. Weisburd, eds. 1995. Crime Places in Crime Theory. In Crime and Place. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fod Economie Algemene Directie Statistiek - Statistics Belgium. 2017. Fiscale statistiek van de inkomens - 2005-2015 [Online]. Statistics Belgium. Available: http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/modules/publications/statistiques/arbeidsmarkt_levensomstandigheden/Statistique_fiscale_des_revenus.jsp (Accessed November 6, 2017).
  19. Gottfredson, M.R., and T. Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Groff, E.R. 2011. Exploring ‘near’: Characterizing the spatial extent of drinking place influence on crime. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44: 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haberman, C.P., and J.H. Ratcliffe. 2015. Testing for temporally differentiated relationships among potentially criminogenic places and census block street robbery counts. Criminology 53: 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardyns, W. 2006. Voetbalcriminaliteit in België anno 2005: Prioriteit of verwaarloosbare overlast?  Een kwantitatief onderzoek. Ghent: Master in Criminology, Ghent University.Google Scholar
  23. Irvin-Erickson, Y., and N. La Vigne. 2015. A Spatio-temporal Analysis of Crime at Washington, DC Metro Rail: Stations’ Crime-generating and Crime-attracting Characteristics as Transportation Nodes and Places. Crime Science 4: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurland, J., S.D. Johnson, and N. Tilley. 2014a. Offenses around Stadiums: A Natural Experiment on Crime Attraction and Generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 51: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurland, J., N. Tilley, and S.D. Johnson. 2014b. The Football ‘Hotspot’ Matrix. In Football Hooliganism, Fan Behaviour and Crime, ed. M. Hopkins, and J. Treadwell. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  26. Lammers, M., B. Menting, S. Ruiter, and W. Bernasco. 2015. Biting once, twice: The influence of past on current crime location choices. Criminology 53: 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maguire, M., R. Wright, and T. Bennett. 2010. Domestic Burglary. In Handbook on Crime, ed. F. Brookman, M. Maguire, H. Pierpoint, and T. Bennett. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Marie, O. 2016. Police and thieves in the stadium: measuring the (multiple) effects of football matches on crime. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 179: 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menting, B., M. Lammers, S. Ruiter, and W. Bernasco. 2016. Family Matters: Effects of Family Members’ Residential Areas on Crime Location Choice. Criminology 54: 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nee, C., and M. Taylor. 1988. Residential Burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A Situational Perspective. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 27: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newey, W.K., and K.D. West. 1986. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelationconsistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ofcom & Human Capital X. Premier League Football: Research into viewing trends, stadium attendance, fans’ preferences and behaviour, and the commercial market. Analysis Advising the Commission of the European Communities relating to a Proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty in case COMP/C/38.173 - FAPL.Google Scholar
  33. Payton, S.B., T.D. Stucky, and J.R. Ottensmann. 2015. The spatial extent of the effect of foreclosures on crime. Social Science Research 49: 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ratcliffe, J.H. 2012a. How Near is Near? Quantifying the Spatial Influence of Crime Attractors and Crime Generators. In Patterns, Prevention, and Geometry of Crime, ed. M.A. Andresen and B. Kinney. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ratcliffe, J.H. 2012b. The Spatial Extent of Criminogenic Places: A Changepoint Regression of Violence around Bars. Geographical Analysis 44: 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Remler, D.K., and G.G. Van Ryzin. 2014. Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Description and Causation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Roman, C. G. 2005. Routine Activities of Youth and Neighborhood Violence: Spatial Modeling of Place, Time, and Crime. In Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis, ed. F. Wang, F. Hershey: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  38. Roman, C.G., and S.E. Reid. 2012. Assessing the Relationship Between Alcohol Outlets and Domestic Violence: Routine Activities and the neighborhood Environment. Violence and Victims 27: 811–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenfeld, R., M.J. Deckard, and E. Blackburn. 2014. The effects of directed patrol and self-initiated enforcement on firearm violence: A randomized controlled study of hot spot policing. Criminology 52: 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherman, L.W., P.R. Gartin, and M.E. Buerger. 1989. Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place. Criminology 27: 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Daele, S., and T. Vander Beken. 2011. Out of Sight, Out Of Mind? Awareness Space and Mobile Offenders. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 19: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weisburd, D.L. 2015. The Law of Crime Concentration and the Criminology of Place. Criminology 53: 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiles, P., and A. Costello. 2000. The ‘Road to Nowhere’: The Evidence for Travelling Criminals. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, R., and S. Decker. 1994. Burglars on the Job: Street Life and Residential Breakins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Vandeviver
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wim Bernasco
    • 3
    • 4
  • Stijn Van Daele
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social LawGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Ghent University HospitalGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations