Explaining the adoption of security measures by places of worship: perceived risk of victimization and organizational structure
Many law enforcement agencies and religious communities are trying to bolster the security measures taken by places of worship. While research has examined the effectiveness or consequences of organizational security, little research has attempted to understand variation in the adoption of security measures. This study derives hypotheses from the criminological and organizational literatures to understand why places of worship vary in their security. The study then assesses those hypotheses using data generated from a survey of places of worship located in the United States. The analysis shows that a place of worship’s perception of future victimization risk significantly increases the odds of security measures being present. Organizational variables, such as size, resources, and role specialization, however, also have significant effects on the odds of a place of worship having security measures. These findings show the importance of considering both organizational and criminological dynamics when examining security and crime in organizational populations.
KeywordsSecurity Organizations Places of worship Cameras Alarms Guards
- Beck, Meagan. 2016. Police to Hold Church Seminar on What to do if There’s an Active Shooter. MLive. www.mlive.com (accessed September 6th).
- Bitzer, Edward G., Peter Y. Chen, and Roger G. Johnston. 2009. Security in Organizations: Expanding the Frontier of Industrial-Organizational Psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 24: 131–148.Google Scholar
- Chaves, Mark, Shawna L. Anderson, and Alison Eagle. 2014. National Congregations Study. Cumulative Data File and Codebook. Durham, NC: Duke University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
- Cirtin, Robert M. 2005. Church Safety and Security: A Practical Guide. Lima, OH: CSS Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Daigle, Leah E. 2012. Victimology: The Essentials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Damanpour, Fariborz. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 555–590.Google Scholar
- Department of Homeland Security. 2017. Resources to Protect Your House of Worship. https://www.fema.gov/faith-resources (accessed April 6th, 2017).
- Felson, Marcus. 1998. Crime and Everyday Life, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- Grammich, Clifford, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley, and Richard H. Taylor. 2012. 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. Seattle: Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies.Google Scholar
- Herold, David M., Narayanan Jayaraman, and C.R. Narayanaswamy. 2006. What is the Relationship between Organizational Slack and Innovation? Journal of Managerial Issues 18 (3): 372–392.Google Scholar
- Horowitz, Jason, Nick Corasaniti, and Ashley Southall. 2015. Nine Killed in Shooting at Black Church in Charleston. The New York Times June 17th, p. A15.Google Scholar
- IBIS World. 2017. US Industry Reports: Fast Food Restaurants. www.ibisworld.com.
- Jenkins, E.Lynn. 1998. Violence in the Workplace Scope of the Problem and Risk Factors. In Violence in the Workplace: Preventing, Assessing, and Managing Threats at Work, ed. Carol W. Wilkinson, 1–19. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes.Google Scholar
- Kimberly, John R., and Michael J. Evanisko. 1981. Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations. The Academy of Management Journal 24 (4): 689–713.Google Scholar
- Mastrofski, Stephen D., R. Richard Ritti, and Debra Hoffmaster. 1987. Organizational Determinants of Police Discretion: The Case of Drinking-Driving. Justice Quarterly 15 (5): 387–402.Google Scholar
- McKeever, Brian S. 2015. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief 2015: Public Charities, Giving, and Volunteering. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- McKeever, Brice S., and Sarah L. Pettijohn. 2014. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief 2014: Public Charities, Giving, and Volunteering. Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/33711/413277-The-Nonprofit-Sector-in-Brief.PDF (accessed February 13, 2017).
- National Organization of Church Security and Safety Management. 2017. About NOCSSM. www.nocssm.org (accessed Aug 15, 2017).
- Rigby, Darrell, and Chris Zook. 2002. Open-Market Innovation. Harvard Business Review 80 (10): 80–89.Google Scholar
- Roach, David. 2013. Protecting Your Church Against Violence. SBC Life. http://www.sbclife.net/Articles/2013/03/sla17 (accessed February 17, 2017).
- Surace, Andrew P., and Eric Konohia. 2016. Securing the Sacred: Making Your House of Worship a Safer Place. Houston, TX: World Wide Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Swicegood, Donna. 2016. Troutman Police Training Local Churches in Safety, Security. Statesville Record & Landmark. www.statesville.com (accessed March 22nd).
- Sygnatur, Eric F., and A. Guy. 2000. Toscano. The Facts. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Work-Related Homicides.Google Scholar
- Unitarian Universalist Association. 2017. Building Security in Churches. http://www.uua.org/safe/117545.shtml (accessed February 17, 2017).
- Van Drake, Stephen. 2001. Mall Security Move Beyond Shoplifters. Business Journal 22 (14): 1.Google Scholar
- Warr, Mark. 1984. Fear of Victimization: Why are Women and the Elderly More Afraid? Social Science Quarterly 65: 681–702.Google Scholar
- Warr, Mark. 1994. Public Perceptions and Reactions to Violent Offending and Victimization. In Consequences and Control, edited by Joseph F. Sheley, 2d ed. Belemont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Yaccino, Steven, Michael Schwirtz, and Marc Santora. 2012. Gunman Kills 6 at a Sikh Temple Near Milwaukee. The New York Times Aug. 5th p. A1.Google Scholar