, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 439–451 | Cite as

‘[A] single, true, certain authenticity’: The authenticity wars in English twentieth-century folk and medieval music revivals

  • Helen DellEmail author


At intervals throughout the twentieth century, serious disputes about authentic musical values arose amongst performers, collectors, scholars, directors, reviewers, and audiences in the folk and medieval music spheres. Analysis of these controversies offers insights into the deep emotions, fantasies, and desires in arguments around authenticity in medievalism. This essay considers two examples of English musical revivalism, one exemplified by the folk song collector Cecil Sharp, the other by Christopher Page, the medieval literature and music scholar and director of music group Gothic Voices. In the writings of both men, emotional concerns about the purity of English musical traditions reveal the role music is given in the maintenance of English nationalism, and more generally in defending notions of identity and social order against feared sources of contamination.



  1. Berger, H. and G. P. Del Negro. Identity and Everyday Life: Essays in the Study of Folklore, Music, and Popular Culture. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boyes, G. 2010. The Imagined Village: Culture, Ideology and the English Folk Revival. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H. 1988. Pedantry or Liberation: A Sketch of the Historical Performance Movement. In Authenticity and Early Music, ed. N. Kenyon, 27–56. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burne, C. 1914. The Handbook of Folklore. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
  5. de Gobineau, A. 1915. The Inequality of Human Races, trans. A. Collins. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. De Landa, M. 2000. Deleuze, Diagrams and the Open-Ended Becoming of the World. In Making Futures: Explorations in Time, Memory and Becoming, ed. E. Grosz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 29–41.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. [1990] 2004. The Simulacrum and Ancient Philosophy. In The Logic of Sense, ed. C. Boundas, trans. M. Lester with C. Stivale, 291–320. London: Continuum,.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. [1966] 2003. Collected Works. Vol. 2. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Falconer, T. 1871. The Elementary Education Act, 1870: Speech delivered at Usk. Usk, UK: J.H. Clark.Google Scholar
  10. Forde, F., vocalist. 1908. Oh! Oh! Antonio. By D. Lipton and C.W. Murphy. Zoophone X-43167.
  11. Haines, J. 2001. The Arabic Style of Performing Medieval Music. Early Music 29(3): 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haines, J. 2013. Antiquarian Nostalgia and the Institutionalization of Early Music. In The Oxford Handbook of Music Revival, eds. C. Bithell and J. Hill, 73–93. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harker, D. 1985. Fakesong: The Manufacture of British ‘Folksong’ 1700 to the Present Day. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kenyon, N. 1988. Introduction. In Authenticity and Early Music: A Symposium, ed. N. Kenyon, 1–18. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kidson, F. 1891. Traditional Tunes: A Collection of Ballad Airs, Chiefly Obtained in Yorkshire and the South of Scotland; Together with their Appropriate Words from Broadsides and from Oral Tradition / Collected and Edited with Illustrative Notes by Frank Kidson. Oxford, UK: Chas. Taphouse & Son.Google Scholar
  16. Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. L. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Livingston, T. 1999. Music Revivals: Toward a General Theory. Ethnomusicology 43(1): 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall, M. L. 2015. Voce Bianca: Purity and Whiteness in British Early Music Vocality. Women and Music: A Journal of Gender and Culture 19: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews, D. 2018. In Search of Lost Feeling: The Emotional History of Medievalism. Exemplaria 30(3): 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Page, C. 1992. The English a cappella Heresy. In Companion to Medieval and Renaissance Music, eds. T. Knighton and D. Fallows, 23–29. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  21. Page, C. 1993. The English a cappella Renaissance. Early Music 21(3): 453–71.Google Scholar
  22. Parliament of the United Kingdom. 1867. The Representation of the People Act 1867, 30 & 31 Vict. c. 102.
  23. Said, E. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  24. Sharp, C. 1907. English Folk-Song: Some Conclusions. London: Simpkin & Co; Novello & Co.Google Scholar
  25. Sharp, C. and S. Baring-Gould. ca. 1906. English Folk-Songs for Schools. London: Curwen.Google Scholar
  26. Sherman, B. 1997. The Colonizing Ear: Christopher Page on Medieval Music. In Inside Early Music: Conversations with Performers, 71–95. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Studio der Frühen Musik. 1978. Chanterai por mon coraige. By G. de Dijon. On Chansons der Trouvères. Telefunken SAWT 9630-A.
  28. Taruskin, R. 1988. The Pastness of the Present and the Presence of the Past. In Authenticity and Early Music, ed. N. Kenyon, 137–207. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, J., vocalist. 1908. Brigg Fair. Scholar
  30. Tomlinson, G. 1988. The Historian, the Performer, and Authentic Meaning in Music. In Authenticity and Early Music: A Symposium, ed. N. Kenyon, 115–36. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Treitler, L. 1991. The Politics of Reception: Tailoring the Present as Fulfilment of a Desired Past. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 116(2): 280–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner, V. 1974. Liminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology. Rice University Studies 60(3): 53–92.Google Scholar
  33. Upton, E.R. 2012. Concepts of Authenticity in Early Music and Popular Music Communities. Ethnomusicology Review 17: n.p.
  34. Yri, K. 2010. Thomas Binkley and the Studio der Frühen Musik: Challenging ‘the Myth of Westernness.’ Early Music 38(2): 273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Culture and CommunicationUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations