The Nicaragua Canal: potential impact on international shipping and its attendant challenges
- 81 Downloads
The construction of an interoceanic canal in Nicaragua, a longstanding controversy, has once again become a source of concern in recent years, in both the global shipping industry and the world at large. Since the canal was green-lighted by the Nicaraguan government, scientists and specialists have sharply criticized its potential to inflict lasting environmental and societal damage. The vocal doubts raised by many experts regarding the canal’s feasibility have resulted in several recent postponements of construction. Studies of the project’s challenges and its potential impact on international shipping suggest that the canal will potentially have wide-ranging implications on vessel sizes, the global routing of maritime freight flows and port development along the Atlantic and Pacific coastlines. Many problems now hinder the project, from its economic and engineering viability to its environmental and safety hazards. This research provides a systematic analysis of the potential impact of the Nicaragua Canal on international shipping, as well as the various challenges the project faces.
KeywordsNicaragua Canal Panama Canal International shipping Impact analysis
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51409157), Shanghai Pujiang Program (17PJC053), Program of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China (14YJC630008) and Shanghai Science & Technology Committee Research Project (15590501700). At the time of writing, Xiang Liu was partially funded by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the School of Engineering both at Rutgers University. The authors are solely responsible for the views in this paper.
- ACP. 2014. Annual report. The authority of Panama canal.Google Scholar
- BP. 2015. BP statistical review of world energy. UK: BP.Google Scholar
- DNV. 2012. Shipping 2020. Norway: Det Norse Veritas.Google Scholar
- Drewry, S.C. 2015. Container forecaster. London, UK: Drewry Shipping Consultants Limited.Google Scholar
- Greene J. (2009). The Canal Builders: Making America’s Empire at the Panama Canal. Penguin.Google Scholar
- Huete-Pérez, J.A., M. Ortega-Hegg, G.R. Urquhart, A.P. Covich, K. Vammen, B.E. Rittmann, J.C. Miranda, S. Espinoza-Corriols, A. Acevedo, M.L. Acosta, J.P. Gómez, M.T. Brett, M. Hanemann, A. Härer, J. Incer-Barquero, F.J. Joyce, F.J. Joyce, J.W. Lauer, J.M. Maes, M.B. Tomson, A. Meyer, S. Montenegro-Guillén, W.L. Whitlow, J.L. Schnoor, and J.P. Gómez. 2016. Critical uncertainties and gaps in the environmental-and social-impact assessment of the proposed interoceanic canal through Nicaragua. BioScience 66 (8): 632–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ibáñez, R., R. Condit, G. Angehr, S. Aguilar, T. GarcÍa, R. MartÍnez, A. Sanjur, R. Stallard, S.J. Wright, A.S. Rand, and S. Heckadon. 2002. An ecosystem report on the Panama canal: Monitoring the status of the forest communities and the watershed. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 80 (1): 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kenawy, E.M. 2015. The expected economic effects of the new Suez Canal project in Egypt. European Journal of Academic Essays 1 (12): 13–22.Google Scholar
- Kiiski, T. 2017. Feasibility of commercial cargo shipping along the Northern Sea route. Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, University of Turku.Google Scholar
- MOFCOM. 2012. Risk warning on the construction project of the Nicaragua canal. Ministry of Commerce of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese), http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ztxx/xmlh/xmi/201211/20121108437765.shtml. Accessed Dec 15 2016.
- Obieta, J.A. 2012. The international status of the Suez canal. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Parker, M. 2009. Panama fever: The epic story of the building of the Panama canal. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Probst, J.O. 2016. Pump up the volume. Container ship update 2016, DNV GL, Hamburg, 4–7 Reeves, J.S. (1923). Clearing the way for the Nicaragua canal. The American Journal of International Law 17 (2): 309–313.Google Scholar
- Rodrigue, J.P., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2013. The geography of transport systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rodrigue J.P. 2010. Factors impacting North American Freight distribution in view of the Panama canal expansion. Van Horne Institute.Google Scholar
- Russell, C. 2016. Australia, Brazil boost China iron ore import share. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com. Accessed 27 Jan 2016.
- UNCTAD. 2017. Review of maritime transport. United Nations Conference on trade and development (UNCTAD). Geneva.Google Scholar