Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 111–124 | Cite as

Ship routing and scheduling: the cart before the horse conjecture

  • Harilaos N. PsaraftisEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The literature on ship routing and scheduling has grown substantially over the last few decades, with many papers authored by top experts in this area and examining various versions of the problem. Many publication outlets have hosted these papers, with a broad variety of problem formulations, solution approaches, and application contexts. Equally broad is the range of angles of these papers, spanning the wide field from mostly theoretical analyses, focusing on specific methodological tools, all the way to applied studies, focusing on specific real-world applications. The basic hypothesis of this paper is that we are increasingly seeing papers that are more of theoretical than practical value, and in fact some of them often place the solution approach before real problem definition. As a result of this approach, the connection between these papers and reality is sometimes distant or elusive. To investigate this hypothesis, this paper tries to explain some misconceptions, refers to a limited sample of such papers, and suggests possible ways to rectify this situation in the future.

Keywords

Ship routing and scheduling Fleet deployment Speed optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for their comments.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., and Ö. Ergun. 2008. Ship scheduling and network design for cargo routing in liner shipping. Transportation Science 42 (2): 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnesen, M.J., M. Gjestvang, X. Wang, K. Fagerholt, K. Thun, and J. Rakke. 2017. A traveling salesman problem with pickups and deliveries, time windows and draft limits: Case study from chemical shipping. Computers and Operations Research 77: 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bausch, D., G. Brown, and D. Ronen. 1998. Scheduling short-term marine transport of bulk products. Maritime Policy and Management 25: 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G., G. Graves, and D. Ronen. 1987. Scheduling ocean transportation of crude oil. Management Science 33: 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christiansen, M., K. Fagerholt, and D. Ronen. 2004. Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transportation Science 38 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen, M., K. Fagerholt, B. Nygreen, and D. Ronen. 2013. Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium. European Journal of Operational Research 228: 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devanney, J.W., 2010. The impact of bunker price on VLCC spot rates, in Proceedings Of the 3rd International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics, SNAME Greek Section, Athens, Greece, October.Google Scholar
  8. Grønhaug, R., M. Christiansen, G. Desaulniers, and J. Desrosiers. 2010. A branch-and-price method for a liquefied natural gas inventory routing problem. Transportation Science 44 (3): 400–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fagerholt, K. 2001. Ship scheduling with soft time windows: an optimization based approach. European Journal of Operational Research 131: 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fagerholt, K., and D. Ronen. 2013. Bulk ship routing and scheduling: Solving practical problems may provide better results. Maritime Policy and Management 40 (1): 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hwang, H.-S., S. Visoldilokpun, and J.M. Rosenberger. 2008. A branch-and-price-and-cut method for ship scheduling with limited risk. Transportation Science 42 (3): 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, C.Y. and Meng, Q (eds.) 2015. Handbook of ocean container transportation logistics: making global supply chains effective, Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Li, C., X. Qi, and C.Y. Lee. 2015. Disruption recovery for a vessel in liner Shipping. Transportation Science 49 (4): 900–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magirou, E.F., H.-N. Psaraftis, and T. Bouritas. 2015. The economic speed of an oceangoing vessel in a dynamic setting. Transportation Research Part B 76: 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meng, Q., and S. Wang. 2011. Optimal operating strategy for a long-haul liner service route. European Journal of Operational Research 215: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng, Q., S. Wang, H. Andersson, and K. Thun. 2014. Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: Overview and future research directions. Transportation Science 48 (2): 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norstad, I., K. Fagerholt, and G. Laporte. 2011. Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportation Research Part C 19: 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Psaraftis, H.N., and C.A. Kontovas. 2013. Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxomomy and survey. Transportation Research Part C 26: 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Psaraftis, H.N., and C.A. Kontovas. 2014. Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportation Research Part C 44: 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Psaraftis, H.N., and C.A. Kontovas. 2016. Green maritime transportation: Speed and route optimization. In Green transportation logistics: In search for win-win solutions, ed. H.N. Psaraftis. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Psaraftis, H.N., M. Wen, and C.A. Kontovas. 2016. Dynamic vehicle routing: Three decades and counting. Networks 67 (1): 3–31. doi: 10.1002/net.21628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rana, K., and R.G. Vickson. 1991. Routing container ships using lagrangean relaxation and decomposition. Transportation Science 25 (3): 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ronen, D. 1982. The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. Journal of the Operational Research Society 33: 1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ronen, D. 1983. Cargo ships routing and scheduling: Survey of models and problems. European Journal of Operational Research 12: 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ronen, D. 1993. Ships scheduling: the last decade. European Journal of Operational. Research 71 (3): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tirado, G., and L.M. Hvattum. 2016. Improved solutions to dynamic and stochastic maritime pick-up and delivery problems using local search. Annals of Operations Research. doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2177-5.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, S., Q. Meng, and Z. Liu. 2013. Containership scheduling with transit-time-sensitive container shipment demand. Transportation Research Part B 54 (2013): 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, S., A. Alharbi, and P. Davy. 2014. Liner ship route schedule design with port time windows. Transportation Research Part C 41: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xia, J., K.X. Li, H. Ma, and Z. Xu. 2015. Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping. Transportation Science 49 (4): 922–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKgs LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations