Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 476–494 | Cite as

Determining the influential factors of dry port operations: worldwide experiences and empirical evidence from Malaysia

  • Jagan JeevanEmail author
  • Shu-Ling Chen
  • Stephen Cahoon
Original Article

Abstract

The introduction of dry ports to transport networks facilitates trade, allows containers to be distributed between transport modes and ensures optimal use of networks. However, dry ports face several challenges, which have a significant impact on their operations, often reducing the benefits from developing dry ports in national or regional freight transport systems. In this regard, this paper investigates the influential factors of dry port operations. We firstly identify five categories of influencing factors and their respective sub-factors. Subsequently, we conduct an empirical study through a web-based survey of Malaysian dry port stakeholders. Multiple regression is employed for data analysis. Findings suggest 12 factors of significant importance to Malaysian dry port operations, including the need for sufficient information sharing; accurate freight forecasting, customs clearance, value-added services, adequate highway infrastructure; existence of appropriate operational equipment and sufficient space for current and future container storage; implementation of public–private partnerships; impact of seaport and short sea shipping policy; road connectivity and the location itself of dry ports. The paper is expected to be of managerial value to dry port operators, when developing strategies to enhance operational efficiency.

Keywords

Malaysia Dry ports Container seaports Port competitiveness Seaport systems 

References

  1. Arvis, J.F., M.A. Mustara, L. Ojala, L. Shepperd, and D. Saslavsky. 2010. Connecting to compete-trade logistics in global economy report. The logistics performance index and its indicator. Washington D.C: World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Finland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aversa, R., R.C. Botter, H. Haralambides, and H.T. Yoshizaki. 2005. A mixed integer programming model on the location of a hub port in the east coast of South America. Journal of Maritime Economics & Logistics 7: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beresford, A.K.C., and R.C. Dubey. 1990. Handbook on the management and operation of dry ports. Geneva: United Nation.Google Scholar
  4. Beresford, A.K.C., S. Petit, Q. XU, and S. Williams. 2012. A study of dry port development in China. Journal of Maritime Economic and Logistics 14: 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergqvist, R., J. Woxenius, and G. Falkemark. 2010. Establishing intermodal terminal. Transportation Research 3: 285–302.Google Scholar
  6. Bichou, K., and R. Gray. 2004. A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement. Journal of Maritime Policy and Management 31: 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, J., T. Kyu, V. Roso, and K. Tara. 2013. Critical evaluation of Mandalay dry port, Myanmar. 5th International Conference on Logistics and Transport 2013 (ICLT 2013) “Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Asia Pacific”, November 5–8, 2013. Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan. 107–114.Google Scholar
  8. Bowerman, B.L., and R.T. O’Connell. 1990. Linear statistical models: An applied approach, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  9. Bruce, L., C. Miiler, O. Libby, and B. Ritchey. 2013. Observation on the potential for dry ports terminal developments in United States, England, 124–166, Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Cetin, C. K. and A. G. Cerit. 2009. Organisational change of seaports: Impact on effectiveness. Annual conference of International Association of maritime economics (IAME), 24–26 June Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  11. Christiaanse, E., and K. Kumar. 2000. ICT enabled coordination dynamics supply webs. Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 30: 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, S. L., J. Jeevan and S. Cahoon. 2015. Hinterland connectivity of Malaysian container seaports: Challenges and solutions’. In proceedings of the global integration of economies and connectivity development in collaboration with Asian Logistics Round Table (ALRT), August 31–September 1, 2015, Soochow University Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  13. Chuen, C., M.R. Karim, and S. Yusoff. 2014. Mode choice between private and public transport in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal. doi: 10.1155/2014/394587.Google Scholar
  14. Cullinane, K.P., and G. Wilmsmeier. 2011. The contribution of the dry port concept to the extension of port life cycles, in handbook of terminal planning. New York: Operations Research Computer Science interfaces series.Google Scholar
  15. Cullinane, K., R. Bergqvist, and G. Wilmsmeier. 2012. The dry port concept: Theory and practice. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics 14: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doust, K., and J. Black. 2009. A holistic assessment framework for urban development and transportation with innovative triple bottom line sustainability metrics—an International Perspective. MIT Journal of Planning 9: 10–27.Google Scholar
  17. DuBrin, A.J. 2003. Essentials of Management. Peterborough, Ontario: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  18. Eric, L.M., P.S. Gabriel and J. Ricardo. 2013. Potential for logistics zones development: Chile as a case study England, 233–249. Farnham: Ashgate publishing company.Google Scholar
  19. FDT. 2007. Feasibility study on the network operation of hinterland hubs (Dry Port Concept) to improve and modernize ports’ connections to the hinterland and to improve networking, 21–64. Netherlands: Integrating Logistics Center Networks in The Baltic Sea Region (INLOC).Google Scholar
  20. Frost, J.D. 2010. The “close” dry port concept and the Canadian context. Journal of Maritime Economics & Logistics 10: 108–129.Google Scholar
  21. Garnwa, P., A. Beresford, and S. Petit. 2009. Dry ports: A comparative study of the UK and Nigeria. United Nation: UNESCAP Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
  22. Garver, M.S., Z. Williams, and G.S. Taylor. 2008. Employing latent class regression analysis to examine logistics theory: An application of truck driver retention. Journal of Business Logistics 29: 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gujar, G. and V.V Thai. 2013. Measurement of container security at dry ports. International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA) 2013: Trade, Supply Chain Activities and Transport: Contemporary Logistics and Maritime Issues.Google Scholar
  24. Hanaoka, S., and M.B. Regmi. 2011. Promoting intermodal freight transport through the development of dry ports in Asia: An environmental perspective. Journal of International Association of Traffic and Safety Science 35: 16–23.Google Scholar
  25. Haralambides, H., and G. Gujar. 2012. On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: An ECO-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India. Maritime Economics and Logistics 14: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hesse, M., and J. Rodrigue. 2004. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography 12: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horst, V.D., and W. Langen. 2008. Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenges for seaport community. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics 10: 108–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horst, V.D., M. Larissa, and L.M. Langen. 2011. Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: Empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam. Journal of Maritime Policy and Management 38: 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphries, A.M. 2004. Growth Triangle of South East Asia. In Indonesia—Malaysia—Singapore Growth Triangle, ed. A. Duffy. Australia: East Asia Analytical Unit.Google Scholar
  30. ICT. (2015) Ipoh Cargo Terminal: Port and value added services. http://www.ictipoh.com.my/. Accessed 18 April 2015.
  31. Iskandar, M. and S. Ibrahim. 2010. Supply chain management and E-commerce technology adoption among logistics service providers in Malaysia. Proceedings of World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  32. Jarzemskis, A., and V. Vailiauskas. 2007. Research on dry port concept as intermodal node. Journal of Transportation Economics 22: 207–213.Google Scholar
  33. Jeevan, J., S.L. Chen, and E.S. Lee. 2015. The challenges of Malaysian dry ports development. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 31: 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karadas, M., H.M. Celik, U. Serpen, and M. Toksoy. 2015. Multiple regression analysis of performance parameters of a binary cycle geothermal power plant. Geothermics 54: 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klassen, A.C., J. Creswell, V.L. Plano Clark, K.C. Smith, and H.I. Meissner. 2012. Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research 21: 377–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langen, D., and L.M. Lugt. 2007. Government structure of port authorities in the Netherlands: devolution, port governance and port performance. Journal of Transportation Economics 17: 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mak, J., and B.K. Tai. 2010. Port development within the framework of Malaysia’s transport policy: Some considerations. Journal of Maritime Policy and Management 28: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MOT. 2015. Ministry of Transportation, Malaysia. http://www.mot.gov.my/en/Statistics/Pages/Maritime.aspx. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  39. Nazery, K. 2007. Port privatization in the context of a developing nation: The Malaysian experience.” Restructuring of Indian ports: reforms and challenges. Hyderabad, India The Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India.Google Scholar
  40. NCIA. 2011. Northern Corridor Implementation Authority Putrajaya Malaysia: Prime Minister Department, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  41. Ng, A.K., and G.C. Gujar. 2009. Government policy, efficiency and competitiveness: The case study of Ports in India. Journal of Transport Policy 16: 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ng, A.K.Y., and B. Cetin. 2012. Locational characteristics of dry ports in developing economies: Some lessons from Northern India. Journal of Regional Studies 46: 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ng, A.K.Y., F. Padilha, and A.A. Pallis. 2013. Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: The Brazilian case. Journal of Transport Geography 27: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nulty, D.D. 2008. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nguyen, D.V.H. 2014. The development of dry ports in Vietnam. Vietnam: International Cooperation Department.Google Scholar
  46. Padilha, P., and A.K. Ng. 2012. The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies. The Brazilian experience. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics 14: 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paixao, A.C., and P.B. Marlow. 2003. Fourth generation ports: A question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 33: 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Panayides, P.M., and D.W. Song. 2009. Port integration in global supply chains: Measures and implications for maritime logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management 12: 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. PWD. 2014 Public Work Department. Malaysian Highway Authority http://www.kkr.gov.my/ms/node/118. Accessed 16 September 2014.
  50. Robles, L.T. 2013. The Brazilian seaport system: A post-1990 institutional and economic review. Journal of Transportation Business and Management 8: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodrigue, J.P., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2006. The geography of transport systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rodrigue, J.P., J. Debrie, A. Fremont, and E. Gouvernal. 2010. Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography 18: 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosa, A. and R. Roscelli. 2009. Development of dry ports. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. New York: United Nation.Google Scholar
  54. Roso, V. 2008. Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38: 782–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roso, V. and K. Lumsden. 2009. The dry port concept: Moving seaport activities inland? Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. New York: United Nation.Google Scholar
  56. Roso, V., and K. Lumsden. 2010. A review of dry ports. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics 12: 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roso, V., J. Woxenius, and K. Lumsden. 2009. The dry port concept: Connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 17: 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. SAN Antonio PORT. 2014. Chilean port system. Dresdner Kleinwort Benson: South Andes Ltd.Google Scholar
  59. Shirley, C., and C. Winston. 2004. Firm inventory behavior and the returns from highway infrastructure investments. Journal of Urban Economics 55: 398–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SIP. (2015) Segamat Inland Port: Products and services. http://transportation.zibb.com/profile/segamat+inland+port+sdn+bhd/my/johor/segamat/85000/26338785. Accessed 18 April 2015.
  61. Sukdanot, S., J. Rudjanakanoknad and W. Suksirivoraboot. 2013. Development of Thai International Ports inaccordance with ASEAN Economic Community Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2013 Taipei.Google Scholar
  62. Trainaviciute, L. 2009. The dry port: Concept and perspectives. In: Bentzen, K., Laugesen, & Caruso., A. (eds.). Denmark: Association of Danish Transport and Logistics Centres.Google Scholar
  63. UNESCAP. 2006. Logistics sector developments: Planning models for enterprises and logistics clusters.. United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific New York: United Nation.Google Scholar
  64. UNESCAP. 2008. Improvement of transport and logistics facilities to expand port hinterlands: policy guidelines. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  65. UNESCAP. 2009. Review of Developments in Transport in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific: New York, United States.Google Scholar
  66. UNESCAP. 2010. The development of dry ports along the Asian Highway and Trans-Asian Railway networks. New York: United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
  67. Valautham, A. 2007. Container Transportation by Railways. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific: The development of container landbridge train services between Malaysia and Thailand.Google Scholar
  68. Veenstra, A., R. Zuidwijk, and E. Van Asperen. 2012. The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 14: 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Viser, J., R. Konings, B.J. Pielage, and B. Wiegmans. 2009. A new hinterland transport concept for the port Rotterdam: Organisational or technological challenges? Journal of Transportation Research 4: 201–216.Google Scholar
  70. Woxenius, J., and R. Bergqvist. 2010. Hinterland Transport by train: Comparing the Scandinavian conditions for maritime Containers and semi-trailers. Journal of Transport Geography 8: 125–136.Google Scholar
  71. Woxenius, J., V. Roso, and K. Lumsden. 2004. The dry port concept–connecting seaports with their hinterland by rail. ICLSP Conference Proceedings, 22–26 September 2004. Dalian: Department of Transportation and Logistics Chalmers University of Technology, 305–319.Google Scholar
  72. Zou, Y. 2009. Discussion on dry ports development in China. Journal of Water Transportation Management 12: 18–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Maritime and Logistics Management, National Centre for Ports and Shipping, Australian Maritime CollegeUniversity of TasmaniaLauncestonAustralia

Personalised recommendations