Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 280–299 | Cite as

Assessing risk in the intercontinental transportation of crude oil

  • Atiq W. SiddiquiEmail author
  • Manish Verma
Original Article


Marine transportation, the primary mode for oil and petroleum shipments, could result in oil spill episodes. Fortunately, catastrophic events such as Exxon Valdez, which resulted in enormous socioeconomic and environmental costs, are rare though smaller operational spills are rather frequent. Interestingly, most of the risk assessment engagements have focused on local geographical areas, thus not suitable for intercontinental transportation because of major variations in spill-related socio-economic and environmental costs around the world. We propose a risk assessment methodology that not only encapsulates the Formal Safety Assessment guidelines proposed by the International Maritime Organization, but also takes into consideration the location-specific economic and environmental costs. The methodology, which involves an expected consequence approach applied over a segmented route, is applied to solve a realistic size problem instance, which is then analysed to gain managerial insights.


maritime oil transportation risk assessment cleanup cost socioeconomic cost environmental cost 



The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and detailed comments that helped improve this article to its present form.


  1. Al-Rabeh, A.H., Lardner, R.W. and Gunay, N. (2000) Gulfspill version 2.0: A software package for oil spills in the Arabian Gulf. Environmental Modelling and Software, 15(4): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgherr, P. (2007) In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources. Journal of hazardous materials, 140(1–2): 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B. and Ronen, D. (2007) Chapter 4 Maritime Transportation. In: B. Cynthia and L. Gilbert (eds.) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Elsevier, pp. 189–284.Google Scholar
  4. Cronk, J.K., Mitsch, W.J. and Sykes, R.M. (1990) Effective modelling of a major inland oil spill on the Ohio River. Ecological Modelling 51(3-4): 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Douligeris, C., Iakovou, E. and Yudhbir, L. (1997) Maritime Route Risk Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transportation. Paper presented at the IFAC Transportation Systems - TS’97: A proceedings volume from the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS symposium, Chania, Greece, 16–18 June 1997; 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Eide, M.S., Endresen, Ø., Breivik, Ø., Brude, O.W., Ellingsen, I.H., Røang, K., Hauge, J. and Brett P.O. (2007) Prevention of oil spill from shipping by modelling of dynamic risk. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54(10): 1619–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eliopoulou, E. and Papanikolaou, A. (2006) Casualty Analysis of Tankers. Learning from Marine Incidents III.Google Scholar
  8. Eliopoulou, E. and Papanikolaou, A. (2007) Casualty Analysis of Large Tankers. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 12(4): 240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erkut, E., Tjandra, S.A. and Verter, V. (2007) Chapter 9 Hazardous Materials Transportation. In: B. Cynthia and L. Gilbert (eds.) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 539–621.Google Scholar
  10. Etkin, S. (1999) Estimating Cleanup Costs for Oil Spills. Paper presented at.Google Scholar
  11. Etkin, S. (2000) Worldwide Analysis of Marine Oil Spill Cleanup Cost Factors. Paper presented at; June 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, T.G. and Sorgard, E. (2000) Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2): 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grigalunas, T.A., Opaluch, J.J., French, D., Reed, M. and Knauss, D. (1988) A natural resource damage assessment model for coastal and marine environments. GeoJournal, 16(3): 315–321.Google Scholar
  14. Guillen, G., Rainey, G. and Morin, M. (2004) A simple rapid approach using coupled multivariate statistical methods, GIS and trajectory models to delineate areas of common oil spill risk. Journal of Marine Systems 45(3–4): 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu, S., Fang, Q., Xia, H. and Xi, Y. (2007) Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92(3): 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huijer, K. (2005) Trend in Oil from Tanker Ships 1995–2004. London: International Tanker Owner Pollution Federation (ITOPF).Google Scholar
  17. Iakovou, E.T. (2001) An interactive multiobjective model for the strategic maritime transportation of petroleum products: Risk analysis and routing. Safety Science 39(1–2): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ITOPF (2009) ITOPF Oil Spill Statistics,, accessed 15 January 2010.
  19. Liu, X. and Wirtz, K.W. (2009) The economy of oil spills: Direct and indirect costs as a function of spill size. Journal of hazardous materials, In Press, Accepted Manuscript: 471–477.Google Scholar
  20. Price, J.M., Johnson, W.R., Marshall, C.F., Ji, Z.-G. and Rainey, G.B. (2003) Overview of the oil spill risk analysis (OSRA) model for environmental impact assessment. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 8(5–6): 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodrigue, J., Comtois, C. and Slack, B. (2009) The Geography of Transport Systems, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Safdor (2008a) Formal Safety Assessment, FSA–Crude Oil Tankers, Submitted by Denmark (MEPC 58/17/2): International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  23. Safdor (2008b) Formal Safety Assessment, FSA–Crude Oil Tankers, Submitted by Denmark (MEPC 58/INF.2): International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  24. Shahriari, M. and Frost, A. (2008) Oil spill cleanup cost estimation–Developing a mathematical model for marine environment. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 86(3): 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Siddiqui, A.W. (2012) Tactical Planning in Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  26. Siddiqui, A. and Verma, M. (2013) An expected consequence approach to route choice in the maritime transportation of crude oil. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 33(11): 2041–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soares, C.G. and Teixeira, A.P. (2001) Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 74(3): 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Talley, W.K. (1999) Determinants of the property damage costs of tanker accidents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 4(6): 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanem, E., Endresen, Ø. and Skjong, R. (2008) Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93(9): 1354–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verma, M. (2009) A cost and expected consequence approach to planning and managing railroad transportation of hazardous materials. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14(5): 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wheeler, T.A. (1993) Risk-based ranking of dominant contributors to maritime pollution events. Risk Analysis 13(2): 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yapa, P.D., Shen, H.T., Wang, D. and Angammana, K. (1992) An integrated computer model for simulating oil spills in the Upper St. Lawrence River. Journal of Great Lakes Research 18(2): 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yudhbir, L. and Iakovou, E. (2001) A Maritime Oil Spill Risk Assessment Model. Paper presented at the 2001 International Oil Spill ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of DammamDammamSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations