Advertisement

Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 125–138 | Cite as

From OTA interface design to hotels’ revenues: the impact of sorting and filtering functionalities on consumer choices

  • Gerard LoosschilderEmail author
  • Jean-Pierre I. van der Rest
  • Zvi Schwartz
  • Paolo Cordella
  • Dirk Sierag
Research Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Using conjoint analysis and choice data from 1492 Dutch participants, this experimental study explores the impact of user interface functionalities on hotels’ customer online behavior and the subsequent economic ramifications for both the search engine service providers and their hotel clients. Specifically, it explores the impact of sorting and filtering on the relationship between a hotel’s placements on the initial search results booking page and the likelihood of being booked. The findings indicate that the availability of sort and filter functions generates a more balanced distribution of booking choices, as users pay more attention to the hotel characteristics that are subject to sorting and filtering functionality. If the sort and filter functions are applied to price, visitors are more likely to choose cheaper rooms, whereas when applied to customer ratings, visitors are more likely to choose rooms with better ratings. The functions affect the search agenda and consequently the economic value of placement in top positions. In addition, sorting and filtering increase the competitiveness of the search engine because it encourages users to apply additional choice criteria beyond merely relying on the hotel’s placement on the search result page.

Keywords

revenue management online travel agent (OTA) willingness-to-pay conjoint analysis search engine marketing (SEM) search user interface design (SUI) 

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Hosanagar, K. and Smith, M. (2011) Location, location, location: an analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6): 1057–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeza-Yates, R., and Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999) Modern information retrieval (Vol. 463). New York: ACM press.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, M. J. (1989) The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online review, 13(5): 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhalla, G. (2011) Collaboration and co-creation: new platforms for marketing and innovation. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceri, S., Bozzon, A., Brambilla, M., Della Valle, E., Fraternali, P., and Quarteroni, S. (2013) Web information Retrieval. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, C., and Schwartz, Z. (2008) Room rate patterns and customers’ propensity to book a hotel room. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 32(3), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng J., Bhargava, K. H., and Pennock, D. (2003) Comparison of allocation rules for paid placement advertising in search engines. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce (ICEC ‘03), 294–299.Google Scholar
  8. Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P., and Li, B. (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Science, 60(7): 1632–1654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodwin, D. (2012). Organic vs. Paid Search Results: Organic Wins 94% of Time, Search Engine Watch, August 23, 2012. Retrieved from http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/news/2200730/organic-vs-paid-search-results-organic-wins-94-of-time, on January 6, 2015.
  10. Green, C.E., and Lomanno, M. (2012) Distribution Channel Analysis: A guide for Hotels, HSMAI foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Greer, C. R., Lusch R. F., and Vargo, S. L. (2016) A service perspective: key managerial insights from service-dominant (S-D) logic, Organizational Dynamics, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.12.004.Google Scholar
  12. Hearst, M.A. (2008) UIs for faceted navigation: recent advances and remaining open problems. In: Proceedings of the second workshop on human-computer interaction and information retrieval (HCIR ‘08), pp 13–17.Google Scholar
  13. Hoban, P.R., and Bucklin, R.E. (2015) Effects of internet display advertising in the purchase funnel: model-based insights from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(3): 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeziorski, P., and Segal, I.R., (2012) What makes them click: empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising (July 25, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417625 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1417625.
  15. Kules, B., Capra, R., Banta, M., and Sierra, T. (2009) What do exploratory searchers look at in a faceted search interface? In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pp 313–322.Google Scholar
  16. Pan, B. (2015) The power of search engine ranking for tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 47: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petrescu, 2014. (2014) Google organic click through rates in 2014. Retrieved from: https://moz.com/blog/google-organic-click-through-rates-in-2014.
  18. Ramaswamy V. and Ozcan, K. (2014) The co-creation paradigm. Stnadford CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Van der Rest, J.I., Cordella, P., Loosschilder, G., and Schwartz, Z. (2016) Connecting search marketing to hotel revenue management: conjoint analysis as a methodology to evaluate the optimal online travel agency commission fee. Service Science, 8(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. White, R.W., and Drucker, S.M. (2007) Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 21–30.Google Scholar
  21. Wildemuth, B.M. (2006) Evidence‐based practice in search interface design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(6), 825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, M.L. (2011) Search user interface design. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 3(3), 1–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson, M.L., Kules, B., and Shneiderman, B. (2010) From keyword search to exploration: designing future search interfaces for the web. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 2(1): 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiang, Z., and Pan, B. (2011) Travel queries on cities in the United States: Implications for search engine marketing for tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 32(1), 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yee, K.P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. (2003, April) Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 401–408.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerard Loosschilder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Pierre I. van der Rest
    • 2
  • Zvi Schwartz
    • 3
  • Paolo Cordella
    • 4
  • Dirk Sierag
    • 5
  1. 1.LeusdenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden Law School, Institute for Tax Law and Economics, Department of Business StudiesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics, Department of Hotel, Restaurant & Institutional ManagementUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.Advanced Analytics CoE, LEGO Company LimitedLondonUK
  5. 5.National Research Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI)/VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations