A case for studying country regimes in the public health model of violence
- 136 Downloads
Many national and international institutions advocate approaching violence as a problem in public health and preventive medicine, in a manner similar to the way we address other disabling and life-threatening pathologies such as cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. Prevention by a health model requires an ecological perspective. Previous work has found evidence that economic factors, including unemployment and relative poverty, as well as political culture and values, may affect violent death rates, including homicide and suicide. Nevertheless, wider political analyses of the effects that different regimes have on these variables have been notably absent, for understandable reasons given the sheer complexity of patterns of governance throughout the world. In view of the importance and scale of the problem, and implications of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, we feel it is nevertheless important to bring regime types into the conversation of factors that can influence violent death.
Keywordsregime type democracy intermediate autocracy violent deaths
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Grace Lee for her valuable input on the conceptual base of this article.
- 2.World Health Assembly. (1996) Prevention of violence: A public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 3.United Nations. (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- 5.Schumpeter, J. (1950) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- 6.Dahl, R.A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- 10.Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R. and Jaggers, K. (2013) Polity IV project: Dataset users’ manual. Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2013.pdf, accessed 27 May 2016.
- 11.Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R. and Jaggers, K. (2014) Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2014. The polity IV dataset. Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4x.htm, accessed 27 May 2016.
- 14.Holinger, P. (1987) Violent deaths in the United States. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Norris, P. (2015). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare, and peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Durkheim, E. (2014) The division of labor in society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- 20.Parsons, T. (1977) The evolution of societies. Toby, J., editor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- 21.Bartels, L.M. (2008) Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- 22.Gilligan, J. (2011) Why some politicians are more dangerous than others. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- 24.Dodolova, M. and Giolbas, A. (2015) Regime type, inequality, and redistributive transfers in developing countries. German Institute of Global and Area Studies Working Paper 273.Google Scholar
- 26.Kant, I. (1795) Perpetual peace. In Kant’s political writings, 2nd ed., edited by Nisbet, H.B. and Reiss, H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Pugh, J. (2005) Democratic peace theory: A review and evaluation. Center for Mediation, Peace, and Resolution of Conflict Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
- 29.Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S. and Gleditsch, N.P. (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review 95(1): 33–48.Google Scholar
- 33.Croissant, A. and Martin, B. (2006) Between consolidation and crisis: Elections and democracy in five nations in Southeast Asia. Berlin: LIT-Verlag.Google Scholar
- 39.The World Bank Group. (2015) Worldwide governance indicators, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home, accessed 27 May 2016.
- 40.Gorodnichenko, Y. and Roland, G. (2016) Culture, institutions and democratization, http://eml.berkeley.edu/~ygorodni/gorrolpolculture.pdf, accessed 27 May 2016.
- 41.Stout, J. (2004) Democracy and tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 42.Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R. and University of Maryland, College Park. (2003). Peace and conflict 2003: A global survey of armed conflicts, self-determination movements, and democracy. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.Google Scholar
- 44.Carbone, G. (2012). Do new democracies deliver social welfare? Political regimes and health policy in Ghana and Cameroon. Decentralization 19(2): 157–183.Google Scholar
- 51.Braithwaite, J. and Braithwaite, V. (1980) The effect of income inequality and social democracy on homicide: A cross-national comparison. The British Journal of Criminology 20(1): 45–53.Google Scholar
- 55.Fox, S. and Hoelscher, K. The political economy of social violence: Theory and evidence from a cross-country study. London: LSE Destin Development Studies Institution; Report No.: 72.Google Scholar
- 57.Hewitt, J.J., Wilkenfeld, J., Gurr, T.R. and University of Maryland (College Park, MD). (2008) Peace and conflict. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
- 61.Horowitz, S. and Schnabel, A. (eds.) (2004) Human rights and societies in transition: Causes, consequences, responses. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- 63.Urdal, H. (2004) The devil in the demographics: The effect of youth bulges on domestic armed conflict, 1950–2000. Social Development Papers: Conflict and Reconstruction Paper.Google Scholar
- 67.Gilligan, J. (1999) Structural violence. In: Gottesman, R. (ed.), Violence in the United States: An encyclopedia. New York, NY: Charles Scribners and Sons, pp. 229–233.Google Scholar