Advertisement

Journal of Marketing Analytics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 220–233 | Cite as

The digital self and customer loyalty: from theory to virtual reality

  • Jared Bischoff
  • Orie BerezanEmail author
  • Lorenzo Scardicchio
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

As digital technologies become deeply integrated into everyday life, consumers have become increasingly connected to the ‘digital sphere,’ and businesses have sought ways in which to capitalize upon this growing trend. This work aims to bring Belk’s (J Consum Res 15(2):139–168,1988) seminal theory of self-development into present day by connecting its concepts with those of customer loyalty formation, highlighting how a modernization of this theory explains the means by which present-day customers are forming attachments to digital goods and the brands and companies associated with them. Through analysis of both historical and current literature regarding self-development, self-expression, and object attachment, we explore how consumers form connections to digital possessions, and how this process has evolved alongside the growing technological integration of daily life. Armed with this knowledge, we offer three propositions on how digital self-development will affect the marketplace, electronic word-of-mouth and customer loyalty in the future, and the opportunities in marketing analytics research to develop more accurate, nuanced metrics that can better encompass relevant aspects of consumers’ digital selves. Our intent is to expand upon existing loyalty literature by explaining how attachment is formed with digital objects, and highlight both the challenges and opportunities this creates in loyalty marketing analytics.

Keywords

Extended self Digital self Customer loyalty Object attachment Social media Electronic word-of-mouth 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aaker, J., and B. Schmitt. 2001. Culture-dependent assimilation and differentiation of the self: Preferences for consumption symbols in the United States and China.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (5): 561–576.Google Scholar
  2. Accenture. 2016.Members of customer loyalty programs generate significantly more revenue for retailers than do non-members, Accenture research finds. New York: Accenture Interactive.https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/members-of-customer-loyalty-programs-generate-significantly-more-revenue-for-retailers-than-do-non-members-accenture-research-finds.htm. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  3. Ahava, A.M., and P. Palojoki. 2004. Adolescent consumers: Reaching them, border crossings and pedagogical challenges.International Journal of Consumer Studies 28 (4): 371–379.Google Scholar
  4. Banks, M. 2001.Visual methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. 2004.Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R.W. 2013. Extended self in a digital world.Journal of Consumer Research 40 (3): 477–500.Google Scholar
  8. Belk, R.W. 2014. The extended self unbound.Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 22 (2): 133–134.Google Scholar
  9. Berezan, O., A.S. Krishen, S. Agarwal, and P. Kachroo. 2018. The pursuit of virtual happiness: Exploring the social media experience across generations.Journal of Business Research 89: 455–461.Google Scholar
  10. Berezan, O., A.S. Krishen, and A. Jenveja. 2019. Loneliness and social media: The interplay of physical and virtual social space. InMarketing and humanity: Discourses in the real world, ed. A.S. Krishen and O. Berezan, 49–68. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Berezan, O., C. Raab, S. Tanford, and Y.S. Kim. 2013. Evaluating loyalty constructs among hotel reward program members using eWOM.Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 39 (2): 198–224.Google Scholar
  12. Berg, J.H., and V.J. Derlega. 1987. Themes in the study of self-disclosure. InSelf-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy, ed. V.J. Derlega and J.H. Berg, 1–8. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, C.R. 1979. Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. InLanguage and social psychology, ed. H. Giles and R. St. Clair, 122–144. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Binark, M., and G. Bayraktutan-Sütcü. 2009. Practicing identity in the digital game world: The Turkish tribes’ community practices in “Silkroad Online”. InDigital technologies of the self, ed. Y. Abbas and F. Dervin, 61–84. New Castle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publication.Google Scholar
  15. Blascovich, J., and J.N. Bailenson. 2011.Infinite reality—Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  16. Booth, N., and J.A. Matic. 2011. Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions.Corporate Communications: An International Journal 16 (3): 184–191.Google Scholar
  17. Boyd, D. 2007. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. InMacArthur Foundation series on digital learning—Youth, identity and digital media volume, ed. D. Buckingham. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bryant, J., and A. Ackerman. 2000. Finding Mii: Virtual social identity and the young consumer. InVirtual social identity and consumer behavior, ed. M. Wood and M. Solomon, 104–127. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  19. Bryant, J.A., A. Sanders-Jackson, and A. Smallwood. 2006. IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11: 577–592.Google Scholar
  20. Chang, H.C. 2010. A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Y., S. Zhu, Y. Zhou, and H. Xu. 2012. Detecting offensive language in social media to protect adolescent online safety. In2012 International conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2012 international conference on social computing.Google Scholar
  22. Chiu, C.M., M.H. Hsu, and E. Wang. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories.Decision Support Systems 42: 1872–1888.Google Scholar
  23. Clemes, M.D., C. Gan, and M. Ren. 2011. Synthesizing the effects of service quality, value, and customer satisfaction on behavioral intentions in the motel industry: An empirical analysis.Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 35: 530–568.Google Scholar
  24. ComScore. 2011.It’s a social world: Social networking leads as top online activity globally, accounting for 1 in every 5 online minutes. ComScore Report, 21 December 2011.https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2011/12/Social-Networking-Leads-as-Top-Online-Activity-Globally. Accessed 1 June 2019.
  25. Day, G.S. 1969. A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty.Journal of Advertising Research 9: 29–35.Google Scholar
  26. DeAndrea, D.C., B. Van Der Heide, M.A. Vendemia, and M.H. Vang. 2018. How people evaluate online reviews.Communication Research 45 (5): 719–736.Google Scholar
  27. Denegri-Knott, J., R. Watkins, and J. Wood. 2012. Transforming digital virtual goods into meaningful possessions. InDigital virtual consumption, ed. M. Molesworth and J.D. Knott, 83–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Dick, A.S., and K. Basu. 1994. Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2): 99–113.Google Scholar
  29. Doster, L. 2013. Millennial teens design and redesign themselves in online social networks.Journal of Consumer Behaviour 12: 267–279.Google Scholar
  30. Eichenberg, C., J. Huss, and C. Küsel. 2017. From online dating to online divorce: An overview of couple and family relationships shaped through digital media.Contemporary Family Therapy 39 (4): 249–260.Google Scholar
  31. Ellison, N., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. 2007. The benefits of facebook “friends”: Social capital and college student’s use of online social network sites.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12: 1143–1168.Google Scholar
  32. Ferraro, R., J.E. Escalas, and J. Bettman. 2010. Our possessions, our selves: Domains of self-worth and the possession-self link.Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (2): 169–177.Google Scholar
  33. Gallo, A. 2014. The value of keeping the right customers.Harvard Business Review.https://hbr.org/2014/10/the-value-of-keeping-the-right-customers. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  34. Giddens, A. 1991.Modernity and self identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Goffman, E. 1959.The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  36. Gracia, E., A. Bakker, and R. Grau. 2011. Positive emotions: The connection between customer quality evaluations and loyalty.Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 52: 458–465.Google Scholar
  37. Herb, G.H., and D.H. Kaplan. 1999.Nested identities, nationalism, territory, and scale. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Hill, R.A., and R.I.M. Dunbar. 2003. Social network size in humans.Human Nature 14 (1): 53–72.Google Scholar
  39. Hu, H., C. Huang, and P. Chen. 2010. Do reward programs truly build loyalty for the lodging industry?International Journal of Hospitality Management 29: 128–135.Google Scholar
  40. James, W. 1890. The self and its selves. InSocial theory: The multicultural readings (2010), ed. C. Lemert, 161–166. Philadelphia: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  41. Jin, S.A.A. 2009. Avatars mirroring the actual self versus projecting the ideal self: The effects of self-priming on interactivity and immersion in an exergame, Wii Fit.CyberPsychology and Behavior 12 (6): 761–765.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, T., R. Shapiro, and R. Tourangeau. 2011.National survey of American attitudes on substance abuse XVI: Teens and parents. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, August 2011.Google Scholar
  43. Kelly, A.E., and K.J. McKillop. 1996. Consequences of revealing personal secrets.Psychological Bulletin 120 (3): 450–465.Google Scholar
  44. Koivisto, E.M. 2003. Supporting communities in massively multiplayer online role-playing games by game design. InDiGRA conference, November 2003.Google Scholar
  45. Krishen, A.S., O. Berezan, S. Agarwal, and P. Kachroo. 2016. The generation of virtual needs: Recipes for satisfaction in social media networking.Journal of Business Research 69 (11): 5248–5254.Google Scholar
  46. Lehdonvirta, V. 2012. A history of the digitalization of consumer culture. InDigital virtual consumption, ed. M. Molesworth and J. Denegri-Knott, 11–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Leigh, J.H., and T.G. Gabel. 1992. Symbolic interactionism: Its effects on consumer behaviour and implications for marketing strategy.Journal of Services Marketing 6 (3): 5–16.Google Scholar
  48. Lutz, R.J., and P.R. Winn. 1974. Developing a Bayesian measure of brand loyalty: A preliminary report. InCombined proceedings, ed. R.C. Curhan, 104–108. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, J. 2008. Consumer code: Use-value, exchange-value, and the role of virtual goods in second life.Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 1: 2–21.Google Scholar
  50. Mick, D., and S. Fournier. 1998. Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies.Journal of Consumer Research 25 (2): 123–143.Google Scholar
  51. Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994.Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Mittal, B. 2006. I, me, and mine—How products become consumers’ extended selves.Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5 (6): 550–562.Google Scholar
  53. Muk, A. 2013. What factors influence Millennials to like brand pages?Journal of Marketing Analytics 1 (3): 127–137.Google Scholar
  54. Nguyen, D.T., and J. Alexander. 1996. The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of the polity. InCultures of Internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies, ed. R. Shields, 99–124. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. O’Keeffe, G.S., and K. Clarke-Pearson. 2011. Clinical report: The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families.Pediatrics 127 (4): 800–804.Google Scholar
  56. Odom, W., A. Sellen, R. Harper, and E. Thereska. 2012. Lost in Translation: Understanding the possession of digital thing in the cloud. InCHI’12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
  57. Oliver, R.L. 1999. Whence consumer loyalty?Journal of Marketing 63 (4_Suppl 1): 33–44.Google Scholar
  58. Pan, Y., S. Sheng, and F.T. Xie. 2012. Antecedents of customer loyalty: An empirical synthesis and reexamination.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 19 (1): 150–158.Google Scholar
  59. Paul, A. 2014. Is online better than offline for meeting partners? Depends: Are you looking to marry or to date?Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 17 (10): 664–667.Google Scholar
  60. Petrick, J. 2004. Are loyal visitors desired visitors?Tourism Management 25 (4): 463–470.Google Scholar
  61. Raab, C., O. Berezan, A.S. Krishen, and S. Tanford. 2016. What’s in a word? Building program loyalty through social media communication.Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 57 (2): 138–149.Google Scholar
  62. Reichheld, F. 2001.Prescription for cutting costs: Loyal relationships. Bain and Company, Inc.https://www.bain.com/insights/prescription-for-cutting-costs-bain-brief. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  63. Robinson, L. 2007. The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age.New Media and Society 9 (1): 93–110.Google Scholar
  64. Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.Google Scholar
  65. Schau, H.J., and M.C. Gilly. 2003. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space.Journal of Consumer Research 30 (3): 385–404.Google Scholar
  66. Sevin, E. 2013. Places going viral: Twitter usage patterns in destination marketing and place branding.Journal of Place Management and Development 6 (3): 227–239.Google Scholar
  67. Sheldon, K.M., N. Abad, and C. Hinsch. 2011. A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (4): 766–775.Google Scholar
  68. Sheth, J., and M. Solomon. 2014. Extending the extended self in a digital world.The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 22 (2): 123–132.Google Scholar
  69. Skogland, I., and J. Sigauw. 2004. Are your satisfied customers loyal?Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 45 (3): 221–234.Google Scholar
  70. Spero, I., and M. Stone. 2004. Agents of change: How young consumers are changing the world of marketing.Qualitative Market Research 7 (2): 153–159.Google Scholar
  71. Statista. 2019. Online dating in the United States—Statistics and facts. Statista.com, 20 March 2019.https://www.statista.com/topics/2158/online-dating. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  72. Svensson, P. 2007. Study: Virtual men are standoffish too.USA Today, 21 February.http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-02-21-virtual-men_x.htm. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  73. Thomas, A., and M. Johansen. 2012. Inside out: Avatars as an indirect measure of ideal body self-presentation in females.Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-3-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tian, K., and R. Belk. 2005. Extended self and possessions in the workplace.Journal of Consumer Research 32: 297–310.Google Scholar
  75. Triandis, H.C. 1991. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.Psychological Review 96 (3): 506–520.Google Scholar
  76. Trifecta. 2015.Generation Z media consumption habits: True digital natives. Trifecta Research.http://trifectaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Generation-Z-Sample-Trifecta-Research-Deliverable.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
  77. Vazire, S., and S.D. Gosling. 2004. e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (1): 123–132.Google Scholar
  78. Walther, J.B. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction.Communication Research 23: 3–43.Google Scholar
  79. Wellman, B., and M. Gulia. 1999. Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. InCommunities and cyberspace, ed. P. Kollock and M. Smith, 331–366. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Wood, N., and M. Solomon. 2010.Virtual social identity. Newport Beach: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Yee, N., and J. Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior.Human Communication Research 33: 271–290.Google Scholar
  82. Yee, N., M. Urbanek, F. Chang, and D. Merget. 2007. The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments.Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10 (1): 116–121.Google Scholar
  83. Yonker, L.M., S. Zan, C.V. Scirica, K. Jethwani, and T.B. Kinane. 2015. ‘Friending’ teens: Systematic review of social media in adolescent and young adult health care.Journal of Medical Internet Research 17 (1): e4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jared Bischoff
    • 1
  • Orie Berezan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lorenzo Scardicchio
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NevadaLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.College of Business Administration and Public PolicyCalifornia State UniversityCarsonUSA

Personalised recommendations