Advertisement

Journal of Marketing Analytics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 205–219 | Cite as

Customer relationship management technology: bridging the gap between marketing education and practice

  • Dana E. HarrisonEmail author
  • Haya Ajjan
Original Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

The recent machine learning and analytics advances in customer relationship management (CRM) technologies place new demands on marketing education and practitioners to develop the skills needed to use the technology. Compounding the issue, research on the use of technology in sales curriculum is underdeveloped. In a comprehensive review of the sales education literature, one study identified that only six articles on sales technology were published in major marketing education journals from 1979 to 2013. In an effort to bridge the gap between critical industry competencies and marketing curriculum, understanding the impact of technology use and training is important for educational planning and student development. Using a survey of 82 salespeople in the United States, the current study empirically evaluates how use of technologically advanced CRM features influences self-perception of CRM knowledge, the perception that additional technology training would be beneficial, and adaptive selling performance of sales practitioners. A majority of survey respondents in the current study cited a need for college students to receive increased exposure to advanced CRM technology training and skill development. We propose an experiential learning approach to teach marketing college students advanced CRM features to help them bolster their effectiveness and value in the workplace.

Keywords

Customer relationship management Adaptive selling Machine learning Marketing education Frequency of CRM use 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Ackerman, D.S., and J. Hu. 2011. Effect of type of curriculum on educational outcomes and motivation among marketing students with different learning styles. Journal of Marketing Education 33 (3): 273–284.Google Scholar
  2. Ahearne, M. 2017. Research centers, business schools, and the world of sales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45 (4): 461–464.Google Scholar
  3. Ahearne, M., R. Jelinek, and A. Rapp. 2005. Moving beyond the direct effect of SFA adoption on salesperson performance: Training and support as key moderating factors. Industrial Marketing Management 34 (4): 379–388.Google Scholar
  4. Ahearne, M., E. Jones, A. Rapp, and J. Mathieu. 2008. High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Science 54 (4): 671–685.Google Scholar
  5. Alshawi, S., F. Missi, and Z. Irani. 2011. Organizational, technical and data quality factors in CRM adoption—SMEs perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 40 (3): 376–383.Google Scholar
  6. Antonio, V. 2018. How AI is changing sales. Harvard business review. https://hbr.org/2018/07/how-ai-is-changing-sales.
  7. Avlonitis, G.J., and N.G. Panagopoulos. 2005. Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management 34 (4): 355–368.Google Scholar
  8. Babin, B.J., M. Griffin, and J.F. Hair. 2016. Heresies and sacred cows in scholarly marketing publications. Journal of Business Research 69 (8): 3133–3138.Google Scholar
  9. Barksdale Jr., H.C., D.N. Bellenger, J.S. Boles, and T.G. Brashear. 2003. The impact of realistic job previews and perceptions of training on sales force performance and continuance commitment: A longitudinal test. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 23 (2): 125–138.Google Scholar
  10. Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  11. Boorom, M.L., J.R. Goolsby, and R.P. Ramsey. 1998. Relational communication traits and their effect on adaptiveness and sales performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (1): 16–30.Google Scholar
  12. Breur, T.J. 2015. Big data and the internet of things. Journal of Marketing Analytics 3 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
  13. Burton-Jones, A., and M.J. Gallivan. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly 31 (4): 657–679.Google Scholar
  14. Buzzard, C., V.L. Crittenden, W.F. Crittenden, and P. McCarty. 2011. The use of digital technologies in the classroom: A teaching and learning perspective. Journal of Marketing Education 33 (2): 131–139.Google Scholar
  15. Carnevale, A.P., J. Strohl, and M. Melton. 2011. What’s it worth? The economic value of college majors. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/559309.
  16. Choudhury, M.M., and P. Harrigan. 2014. CRM to social CRM: The integration of new technologies into customer relationship management. Journal of Strategic Marketing 22 (2): 149–176.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, S., J.W. Peltier, R. Erffmeyer, and J. Whalen. 2013. A critical review of the literature for sales educators. Journal of Marketing Education 35 (1): 68–78.Google Scholar
  18. D’Aloisio, A. 2006. Motivating students through awareness of the natural correlation between college learning and corporate work settings. College Teaching 54 (2): 225–230.Google Scholar
  19. Davies et al. 2017. The gartner vendor guide. published: 09 June 2017 ID: G00324453. https://www.gartner.com/document/3832563.
  20. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, R., S. Misra, and S. Van Auken. 2002. A gap analysis approach to marketing curriculum assessment: A study of skills and knowledge. Journal of Marketing Education 24 (3): 218–224.Google Scholar
  22. Day, G.S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 58 (4): 37–52.Google Scholar
  23. Day, G. S. 2001. Capabilities for forging customer relationships. Unpublished manuscript, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  24. Day, G.S., and C. Van den Bulte. 2002. Superiority in customer relationship management: Consequences for competitive advantage and performance. Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  25. DeNisco-Rayome, D. 2017. The Top 10 barriers to digital transformation. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/the-top-10-barriers-to-digital-transformation/.
  26. Duffy, K., and J. Ney. 2015. Exploring the divides among students, educators, and practitioners in the use of digital media as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Marketing Education 37 (2): 104–113.Google Scholar
  27. Erevelles, S., N. Fukawa, and L. Swayne. 2016. Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. Journal of Business Research 69 (2): 897–904.Google Scholar
  28. Farquad, M.A.H., V. Ravi, and S.B. Raju. 2014. Churn prediction using comprehensible support vector machine: An analytical CRM application. Applied Soft Computing 19: 31–40.Google Scholar
  29. Ferrell, O.C., J.F. Hair Jr., G.W. Marshall, and R.D. Tamilia. 2015. Understanding the history of marketing education to improve classroom instruction. Marketing Education Review 25 (2): 159–175.Google Scholar
  30. Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.Google Scholar
  31. Franke, George R., and Jeong-Eun Park. 2006. Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (4): 693–702.Google Scholar
  32. Frederiksen, L.W. 2015. 3 key digital marketing skills students don’t learn in college. http://www.fastcompany.com/welcome.html?destination=http://www.fastcompany.com/3041253/3-key-digital-marketing-skillsstudents-dont-learn-in-college.Google Scholar
  33. Fuller, C.M., M.J. Simmering, G. Atinc, Y. Atinc, and B.J. Babin. 2016. Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research 69 (8): 3192–3198.Google Scholar
  34. Gartner. 2018. Gartner says CRM became the largest software market in 2017 and will be the fastest growing market in 2018. https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3871105.
  35. Goodhue, D.L., and R.L. Thompson. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly 19 (2): 213–236.Google Scholar
  36. Granitz, N., and P. Hugstad. 2004. Creating and diffusing a technology champion course. Journal of Marketing Education 26 (3): 208–225.Google Scholar
  37. Gray, D.M., J.W. Peltier, and J.A. Schibrowsky. 2012. The journal of marketing education: Past, present, and future. Journal of Marketing Education 34 (3): 217–237.Google Scholar
  38. Grewal, D., S. Motyka, and M. Levy. 2018. The evolution and future of retailing and retailing education. Journal of Marketing Education 40 (1): 85–93.Google Scholar
  39. Grewal, D., A.L. Roggeveen, and G. Shankaranarayanan. 2015. Marketing—ITS integration: Developing next-generation managers. In Evolving education, ed. V. Crittenden, K. Esper, N. Karst, and R. Slegers, 139–157. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  40. Griffith, T.L. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 472–488.Google Scholar
  41. Hair Jr., J.F., D.E. Harrison, and J.J. Risher. 2018a. Marketing research in the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges. Brazilian Journal of Marketing (Revista Brasileira de Marketing) 17 (5): 666–699.Google Scholar
  42. Hair, J.F., C.L. Hollingsworth, A.B. Randolph, and A. Chong. 2017a. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems 117 (3): 442–458.Google Scholar
  43. Hair, J.F., L.M. Matthews, R.L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt. 2017b. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis 1 (2): 107–123.Google Scholar
  44. Hair, J.F., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152.Google Scholar
  45. Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V.G. Kuppelwieser. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review 26 (2): 106–121.Google Scholar
  46. Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, T.M. Pieper, and C.M. Ringle. 2012a. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning 45 (5–6): 320–340.Google Scholar
  47. Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, and S.P. Gudergan. 2018b. Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, and J.A. Mena. 2012b. An assessment of the use of Partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (3): 414–433.Google Scholar
  49. Hannaford, W., R. Erffmeyer, and C. Tomkovick. 2005. Assessing the value of an undergraduate marketing technology course: What do educators think? Marketing Education Review 15 (1): 67–76.Google Scholar
  50. Harrigan, P., and B. Hulbert. 2011. How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The new marketing DNA as a model for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 33 (3): 253–272.Google Scholar
  51. Harrison, D.E., and J.F. Hair. 2017. The use of technology in direct-selling marketing channels: Digital avenues for dynamic growth. Journal of Marketing Channels 24 (1–2): 39–50.Google Scholar
  52. Hartley, P., P.W. Routon, and L. Torres. 2018. The skills marketing majors believe they acquire: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Marketing Education, 0273475318757282.Google Scholar
  53. Healy, W. J., Z. Taran, and S. C. Betts. 2011. Sales Course Design Using Experiential Learning Principles and Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 6.Google Scholar
  54. Henke, N., J. Levine, and P. McInerney. 2018. You don’t have to be a data scientist to fill this must have analytics role. https://hbr.org/2018/02/you-dont-have-to-be-a-data-scientist-to-fill-this-must-have-analytics-role.
  55. Henseler, J., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1): 115–135.Google Scholar
  56. Hollenbeck, C.R., C.H. Mason, and J.H. Song. 2011. Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for website platforms. Journal of Marketing Education 33 (2): 171–182.Google Scholar
  57. Hopkins, C.D., M.A. Raymond, and L. Carlson. 2011. Educating students to give them a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing Education 33 (3): 337–347.Google Scholar
  58. Hunter, G.K., and W.D. Perreault Jr. 2006. Sales technology orientation, information effectiveness, and sales performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 26 (2): 95–113.Google Scholar
  59. Hunter, G.K., and W.D. Perreault Jr. 2007. Making sales technology effective. Journal of Marketing 71 (1): 16–34.Google Scholar
  60. Jaber, F., and L. Simkin. 2017. Unpicking antecedents of CRM adoption: A two-stage model. Journal of Strategic Marketing 25 (5–6): 475–494.Google Scholar
  61. Jasperson, J.S., P.E. Carter, and R.W. Zmud. 2005. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 525–557.Google Scholar
  62. Knight, P., C.C. Mich, and M.T. Manion. 2014. The role of self-efficacy in sales education. Journal of Marketing Education 36 (2): 156–168.Google Scholar
  63. Ko, E., S.H. Kim, M. Kim, and J.Y. Woo. 2008. Organizational characteristics and the CRM adoption process. Journal of Business Research 61 (1): 65–74.Google Scholar
  64. LeClair, D. 2018. Integrating business analytics in the marketing curriculum: Eight recommendations. Marketing Education Review 28 (1): 6–13.Google Scholar
  65. Lewandowski, K. 2018. 2018 outlook: Machine learning and artificial intelligence. http://blog.memsql.com/2018-outlook-machine-learning-and-artificial-intelligence/.
  66. LinkedIn & HubSpot. 2015. The marketing skills handbook: A deep dive into today’s most in-demand marketing jobs. http://marketing.linkedin.com/blog/announcing-the-marketing-skills-handbook-a-deep-dive-into-todays-most-in-demand-marketing-jobs/.
  67. Liu, Y., and M.A. Levin. 2018. A progressive approach to teaching analytics in the marketing curriculum. Marketing Education Review 28 (1): 14–27.Google Scholar
  68. Mallin, M.L., D.E. Jones, and J.L. Cordell. 2010. The impact of learning context on intent to use marketing and sales technology: A comparison of scenario-based and task-based approaches. Journal of Marketing Education 32 (2): 214–223.Google Scholar
  69. McCorkle, D.E., J.F. Alexander, and J. Reardon. 2001. Integrating business technology and marketing education: Enhancing the diffusion process through technology champions. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 16–24.Google Scholar
  70. Michaels, R.E., and G.W. Marshall. 2002. Perspectives on selling and sales management education. Marketing Education Review 12 (2): 1–11.Google Scholar
  71. Mintu-Wimsatt, A., and H.R. Lozada. 2018. Business analytics in the marketing curriculum: A call for integration. Marketing Education Review 28 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
  72. Neill, S., and R. Etheridge. 2008. Flexible learning spaces: The integration of pedagogy, physical design, and instructional technology. Marketing Education Review 18 (1): 47–53.Google Scholar
  73. Payne, A., and P. Frow. 2005. A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing 69 (4): 167–176.Google Scholar
  74. Peterson, R.M. 2001. Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (3): 187–194.Google Scholar
  75. Petrescu, M. 2013. Marketing research using single-item indicators in structural equation models. Journal of Marketing Analytics 1 (2): 99–117.Google Scholar
  76. Petrescu, M., and A. Krishen. 2017. Marketing analytics: From practice to academia. Journal of Marketing Analytics 5 (2): 45–46.Google Scholar
  77. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879.Google Scholar
  78. Rapp, A., R. Agnihotri, and L.P. Forbes. 2008. The sales force technology–performance chain: The role of adaptive selling and effort. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 28 (4): 335–350.Google Scholar
  79. Reinartz, W., M. Kraft, and W. Hoyer. 2003. Measuring the customer relationship management construct and linking it to performance outcomes. Insead.Google Scholar
  80. Ringle, C.M., S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker. 2015. SmartPLS 3. Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.com.
  81. Roach, S.S., M.W. Johnston, and J.F. Hair Jr. 1993. An exploratory examination of teaching styles currently employed in marketing education: Developing a typology and its implications for marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education 15 (3): 32–38.Google Scholar
  82. Robinson Jr., L., G.W. Marshall, W.C. Moncrief, and F.G. Lassk. 2002. Toward a shortened measure of adaptive selling. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 22 (2): 111–118.Google Scholar
  83. Rodriguez, M., R.M. Peterson, and H. Ajjan. 2015. CRM/social media technology: Impact on customer orientation process and organizational sales performance. In Ideas in marketing: Finding the new and polishing the old, 636–638. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  84. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  85. Rohm, A.J., M. Stefl, and J. Saint Clair. 2018. Time for a marketing curriculum overhaul: Developing a digital-first approach. Journal of Marketing Education.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318798086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Román, S., and D. Iacobucci. 2010. Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: A dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38 (3): 363–382.Google Scholar
  87. Ryall, M.D., and R.C. Sampson. 2009. Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Science 55 (6): 906–925.Google Scholar
  88. Saini, A., R. Grewal, and J.L. Johnson. 2010. Putting market-facing technology to work: Organizational drivers of CRM performance. Marketing Letters 21 (4): 365–383.Google Scholar
  89. Salesforce Academic Alliance. 2018. Prepare your students with the skills they need for today’s digital economy. https://www.salesforce.com/content/dam/web/en_us/www/documents/datasheets/ds-aa.pdf.
  90. Schlee, R.P., and G.L. Karns. 2017. Job requirements for marketing graduates: Are there differences in the knowledge, skills, and personal attributes needed for different salary levels? Journal of Marketing Education 39 (2): 69–81.Google Scholar
  91. Shah, B., G. Hartman, and B. Whipple. 2014. CMOs: Time for digital transformation or risk being left on the sidelines. Accenture Interactive. https://www.accenture.com/th-en/~/media/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Industries_14/Accenture-CMO-Insights-Web.pdf.
  92. Shih, C.F., and A. Venkatesh. 2004. Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 59–72.Google Scholar
  93. Shoemaker, M.E. 2001. A framework for examining IT-enabled market relationships. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 21 (2): 177–185.Google Scholar
  94. Sledgianowski, D., M. Gomaa, and C. Tan. 2017. Toward integration of Big Data, technology and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education 38: 81–93.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, L.W., and D.C. Van Doren. 2004. The reality-based learning method: A simple method for keeping teaching activities relevant and effective. Journal of Marketing Education 26 (1): 66–74.Google Scholar
  96. Speier, C., and V. Venkatesh. 2002. The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. Journal of Marketing 66 (3): 98–111.Google Scholar
  97. Spiro, R.L., and B.A. Weitz. 1990. Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research 27 (1): 61–69.Google Scholar
  98. Steenkamp, J.B.E. 2018. The future of the marketing department at business schools. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 46 (2): 169–172.Google Scholar
  99. Sujan, H., B.A. Weitz, and N. Kumar. 1994. Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 39–52.Google Scholar
  100. Sundaram, S., A. Schwarz, E. Jones, and W.W. Chin. 2007. Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35 (1): 101–112.Google Scholar
  101. Syam, N., and A. Sharma. 2018. Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Industrial Marketing Management 69: 135–146.Google Scholar
  102. Tanner Jr., J.F., and S. Shipp. 2005. Sales technology within the salesperson’s relationships: A research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management 34 (4): 305–312.Google Scholar
  103. Taylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19 (4): 561–570.Google Scholar
  104. Tenorio, L. 2018. The demand for Salesforce skilled talent is HUGE… It’s time for you to get in on the action! https://medium.com/trailhead/huge-demand-for-salesforce-talent-3bb30c597b39.
  105. Thompson, E., O. Huan, J. Poulter, B. Willemsen, M. Davis, and W. Shulte. 2018. Predicts 2018: CRM and customer experience. 23, November Gartner ID: G00341923.Google Scholar
  106. TrailHead. 2018. Put your students on the path into the Salesforce economy. http://trailhead-for-students.salesforce.com/overview.html#.
  107. Venkatesh, V., F. Davis, and M.G. Morris. 2007. Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information systems 8 (4): 267–286.Google Scholar
  108. Venkatesh, V., J.Y. Thong, and X. Xu. 2016. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17 (5): 328–376.Google Scholar
  109. Wang, X., R. Dugan, and J. Sojka. 2013. CRM systems with social networking capabilities: The value of incorporating a CRM 2.0 System in sales/marketing education. Marketing Education Review 23 (3): 241–250.Google Scholar
  110. Warren, R.G. 1997. Engaging students in active learning. About Campus 2 (1): 16–20.Google Scholar
  111. Wedel, M., and P.K. Kannan. 2016. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing 80 (6): 97–121.Google Scholar
  112. Weitz, B.A., H. Sujan, and M. Sujan. 1986. Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: A framework for improving selling effectiveness. Journal of Marketing 50 (4): 174–191.Google Scholar
  113. Zablah, A.R., D.N. Bellenger, and W.J. Johnston. 2004. An evaluation of divergent perspectives on customer relationship management: Towards a common understanding of an emerging phenomenon. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (6): 475–489.Google Scholar
  114. Zikmund, W.G., R. McLeod, and F.W. Gilbert. 2003. Customer relationship management: Integrating marketing strategy and information technology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  115. Zoltners, A., P.K. Sinha, and S. Lorimer. 2018. Using analytics to align sales and marketing teams. Harvard business review. https://hbr.org/2018/11/using-analytics-to-align-sales-and-marketing-teams.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and TechnologyEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  2. 2.Martha and Spencer Love School of BusinessElon UniversityElonUSA

Personalised recommendations