Advertisement

Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: a meta-analysis

  • Take Sipma
  • Marcel Lubbers
Original Article

Abstract

The contextual-level unemployment rate is often adduced to explain radical right support. It has been assessed before that research findings are mixed, but it is unknown why the association is so different across studies. Our meta-analysis examined 162 effects from 49 studies, and indicated a positive overall effect, as predicted by main theories, but it was rather small. The positive effect was predominantly found among studies that theorized the effect, possibly indicating publication bias. The effect was positive in Western and Eastern Europe, but absent in Northern Europe. The positive effect was furthermore evident only after 2008, when the economic crisis hit Europe. Findings on the effect of unemployment being dependent on immigration were mixed as well. Our study calls for more comprehensive studies that bypass the focus on the main effect of unemployment and extend theorizing about the conditions under which unemployment affects support for the radical right.

Keywords

Radical right Unemployment Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Sacha Sillekens for support in locating and coding the studies.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Amemiya, T. 1981. Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of economic literature 19 (4): 1483–1536.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. 2008. Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist 63: 839–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.J. 1996. Economics, politics, and foreigners: Populist party support in Denmark and Norway. Electoral Studies 15 (4): 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzheimer, K. 2009. Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 259–275. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00369.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arzheimer, K., and E. Carter. 2006. Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research 45 (3): 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baimbridge, M., B. Burkitt, and M. Macey. 1994. The Maastricht treaty: Exacerbating racism in Europe? Ethnic & Racial Studies 17 (3): 420–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berning, C., and B. Weiss. 2016. Publication bias in the German social sciences: An application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals. Quality & Quantity 50 (2): 901–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betz, H.-G. 1994. Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørklund, T. 2007. Unemployment and the radical right in Scandinavia: Beneficial or non-beneficial for electoral support? Comparative European Politics 5 (3): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blalock, H.M. 1967. Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Bloom, S. 2012. Does a nationalist card make for a weak hand? Economic decline and shared pain. Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloom, S. 2013. Minority group size, unemployment, and the extreme right vote: The crucial case of Latvia. Social Science Quarterly 94 (3): 795–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumer, H. 1958. Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boomgaarden, H.G., and R. Vliegenthart. 2007. Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral Studies 26 (2): 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borenstein, M. et al. 2009. Chapter 7: Converting among effect sizes. In Introduction to meta-analysis, ed. M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, H.R. Rothstein. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Bowyer, B. 2008. Local context and extreme right support in England: The British National Party in the 2002 and 2003 local elections. Electoral Studies 27 (4): 611–620. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261379408000723. Accessed 2 Sept 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breen, R. 1996. Regression models: Censored, sample selected or truncated data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Budge, I., and D.J. Farlie. 1976. Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Bustikova, L. 2014. Revenge of the radical right. Comparative Political Studies 47 (12): 1738–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chapin, W.D. 1997. Explaining the electoral success of the new right: The German case. West European Politics 20 (2): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coffé, H., B. Heyndels, and J. Vermeir. 2007. Fertile grounds for extreme right-wing parties: Explaining the Vlaams Blok’s electoral success. Electoral Studies 26 (1): 142–155. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261379406000060. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper, H., L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine. 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Dahlström, C., and A. Sundell. 2012. A losing gamble: How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success. Electoral Studies 31 (2): 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Della Posta, D.J. 2013. Competitive threat, intergroup contact, or both? Immigration and the dynamics of Front National voting in France. Social Forces 92 (1): 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dinas, E., and J. van Spanje. 2011. Crime story: The role of crime and immigration in the anti-immigration vote. Electoral Studies 30 (4): 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duch, R.M., and R. Stevenson. 2008. The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duch, R.M., H.D. Palmer, and C.J. Anderson. 2000. Heterogeneity in percetions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dülmer, H., and M. Klein. 2005. Extreme right-wing voting in Germany in a multilevel perspective: A rejoinder to Lubbers and Scheepers. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Erlingsson, G.O., K. Loxbo, and R. Öhrvall. 2012. Anti-immigrant parties, local presence and electoral success. Local Government Studies 38 (6): 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Evans, J., and G. Ivaldi. 2010. Comparing forecast models of Radical Right voting in four European countries (1973–2008). International Journal of Forecasting 26 (1): 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finseraas, H., and K. Vernby. 2014. A mixed blessing for the left? Early voting, turnout and election outcomes in Norway. Electoral Studies 33: 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibson, R., I. McAllister, and T. Swenson. 2002. The politics of race and immigration in Australia: One Nation voting in the 1998 election. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (5): 823–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Givens, T.E. 2005. Voting radical right in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golder, M. 2003. Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 36 (4): 432–466. http://cps.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0010414003251176. Accessed 11 July 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hooghe, M., and T. Reeskens. 2007. Are cross-national surveys the best way to study the extreme-right vote in Europe? Patterns of Prejudice 41 (2): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackman, R.W., and K. Volpert. 1996. Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jesuit, D.K., P.R. Paradowski, and V. Mahler. 2009. Electoral support for extreme right-wing parties: A sub-national analysis of western European elections. Electoral Studies 28 (2): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnston, R., et al. 2005. Spatial scale and the neighbourhood effect: Multinomial models of voting at two recent British general elections. British Journal of Political Science 35 (3): 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kessler, A.E., and G.P. Freeman. 2005. Support for extreme right-wing parties in Western Europe: individual attributes, political attitudes, and national context. Comparative European Politics 3 (3): 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kestilä, E., and P. Söderlund. 2007a. Subnational political opportunity structures and the success of the radical right: Evidence from the March 2004 regional elections in France. European Journal of Political Research 46 (6): 773–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kestilä, E., and P. Söderlund. 2007b. Local determinants of radical right-wing voting: The case of the Norwegian progress party. West European Politics 30 (3): 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kitschelt, H. 1995. The radical right in Western Europe. A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  43. Knigge, P. 1998. The ecological correlates of right-wing extremism in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 34: 249–279.Google Scholar
  44. Koev, D. 2013. Interactive party effects on electoral performance How ethnic minority parties aid the populist right in Central and Eastern Europe. Party Politics 21 (4): 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Loxbo, K. 2010. The impact of the radical right: Lessons from the local level in Sweden, 2002–2006. Scandinavian political studies 33 (3): 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lubbers, M., and P. Scheepers. 2000. Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme right-wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories. European Journal of Political Research 38 (1): 63–94.Google Scholar
  48. Lubbers, M., and P. Scheepers. 2001. Explaining the Trend in Extreme Right-Wing Voting: Germany 1989–1998. European Sociological Review 17 (4): 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lubbers, M., and P. Scheepers. 2002. French Front National voting: a micro and macro perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (1): 120–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lubbers, M., P. Scheepers, and J. Billiet. 2000. Individual and Contextual characteristic of the Vlaams blok vote. Acta Politica 35 (4): 363–398.Google Scholar
  51. Lubbers, Marcel, Mérove Gijsberts, and P. Scheepers. 2002. Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345–378.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lucassen, G., and M. Lubbers. 2012. Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative Political Studies 45 (5): 547–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mair, P. 2006. Polity-scepticism, party failings, and the challenge to European democracy. Wassenaar, the Netherlands: NIAS.Google Scholar
  54. Meguid, B.M. 2005. Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Minkenberg, M. 2000. The renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition 35 (2): 170–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Minkenberg, M. 2002. The radical right in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative observations and interpretations. East European Politics & Societies 16 (2): 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muis, J. 2015. The Rise and Demise of the Dutch Extreme Right: Discursive Opportunities and Support for the Center Democrats in the 1990s. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 20 (1): 41–60.Google Scholar
  59. Norris, P. 2005. Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olzak, S. 1992. The dynamics of ethnic competition and conflict. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Otto, A.H., and M.F. Steinhardt. 2014. Immigration and election outcomes—Evidence from city districts in Hamburg. Regional Science and Urban Economics 45: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Petrocik, J.R. 1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pettigrew, T.F., and L.R. Tropp. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737372. Accessed 13 July 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pop-Eleches, G. 2010. Throwing out the bums: Protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism. World Politics 62 (2): 221–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poznyak, D., K. Abts, and M. Swyngedouw. 2011. The dynamics of the extreme right support: A growth curve model of the populist vote in Flanders-Belgium in 1987–2007. Electoral Studies 30 (4): 672–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rink, N., K. Phalet, and M. Swyngedouw. 2009. The effects of immigrant population size, unemployment, and individual characteristics on voting for the Vlaams Blok in Flanders 1991–1999. European sociological review 25 (4): 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rydgren, J. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology 33 (1): 241–262. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rydgren, J., and P. Ruth. 2011. Voting for the radical right in Swedish municipalities: social marginality and ethnic competition? Scandinavian Political Studies 34 (3): 202–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rydgren, J., and P. Ruth. 2013. Contextual explanations of radical right-wing support in Sweden: Socioeconomic marginalization, group threat, and the halo effect. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (4): 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Savelkoul, M., M. Gesthuizen, and P. Scheepers. 2011. Explaining relationships between ethnic diversity and informal social capital across European countries and regions: Tests of constrict, conflict and contact theory. Social Science Research 40 (4): 1091–1107. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0049089X11000378. Accessed 6 Feb 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scheepers, P., Merove Gijsberts, and M. Coenders. 2002. Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 18 (1): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schneider, S.L. 2008. Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 24 (1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, J.M. 2010. Does crime pay? Issue ownership, political opportunity, and thepopulist right in western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 43 (11): 1471–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spies, D. 2013. Explaining working-class support for extreme right parties: A party competition approach. Acta Politica 48 (3): 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spies, D., and S.T. Franzmann. 2011. A two-dimensional approach to the political opportunity structure of extreme right parties in Western Europe. West European Politics 34 (5): 1044–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stefanovic, D. 2008. The path to Weimar Serbia? Explaining the resurgence of the Serbian far right after the fall of Milosevic. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31: 1195–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Swank, D., and H.-G. Betz. 2003. Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review 1 (2): 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Teney, C. 2012. Space matters: The group threat hypothesis revisited with geographically weighted regression: The case of the NPD 2009 electoral success. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (3): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van der Brug, W., M. Fennema, and J. Tillie. 2005. Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: A two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies 38 (5): 537–573. http://cps.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0010414004273928. Accessed 2 Sept 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van der Eijk, C., and M. Franklin. 2009. Elections and voters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van der Waal, J., W. de Koster, and P. Achterberg. 2013. Ethnic segregation and radical right-wing voting in Dutch cities. Urban Affairs Review 49 (5): 748–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Gent, W.P., E.F. Jansen, and J.H. Smits. 2014. Right-wing radical populism in city and suburbs: an electoral geography of the Partij Voor de Vrijheid in the Netherlands. Urban Studies 51 (9): 1775–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Viechtbauer, W. 2010. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36 (3): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vlaams Belang. 2014. Verkiezingsprogramma: Uw stok achter de deur, Brussel.Google Scholar
  86. Werts, H., P. Scheepers, and M. Lubbers. 2013. Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics 14 (2): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Westinen, J. 2014. True Finns: A Shock for Stability? Testing the Persistence of Electoral Geography in Volatile Elections. Scandinavian Political Studies 37 (2): 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Whiteley, P. 1979. The National Front Vote in the 1977 GLC Elections: An Aggregative Data Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 9 (3): 370–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations