Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 517–541 | Cite as

The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes

  • Kristof Jacobs
  • Agnes Akkerman
  • Andrej Zaslove
Original Article

Abstract

Populist parties claim that democratic regimes fail to deliver results that are in line with what ‘the people’ want. To address this policy outcome failure, they favour direct democracy (especially when in opposition). Yet we do not know whether populists’ proposed solution—referendums—resonates with ‘the people’ it wishes to empower. This study fills this gap. First, we analyse to what extent citizens with populist attitudes favour referendums. Second, we analyse to what extent populist attitudes are linked to the decision to vote in the 2016 Dutch referendum about the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement. Third, we analyse to what extent these attitudes are linked to their vote choice. To answer these questions, we use the Dutch 2016 National Referendum Survey. Among others, we find that populist citizens are more likely to favour referendums and they are more likely to cast a ‘No’-vote, regardless of their party preference and trust in government.

Keywords

Populist attitudes Referendum Voter turnout Vote choice The Netherlands 

References

  1. Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkerman, A., A. Zaslove, and B. Spruyt. 2017. ‘We the people’ or ‘we the peoples’? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in The Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman, D. 2011. Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowler, S., D. Denemark, T. Donovan, and D. McDonnell. 2016. Right-wing populist party supporters: Dissatisfied but not direct democrats. European Journal of Political Research 56: 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. 2013. The limits of electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broer, T. 2016. Wat nu, na het referendum? De verdeeldheid in kaart. https://www.vn.nl/josse-de-voogd-oekraine-referendum/. Last visited 31 August 2016.
  7. Bühlmann, M., and M. Freitag. 2006. Individual and contextual determinants of electoral participation. Swiss Political Science Review 12 (4): 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caramani, D. 2017. Will vs. reason: the populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review 111 (1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centerdata. 2016a. About the Panel. https://www.lissdata.nl/lissdata/about-panel. Last visited 24 August 2016.
  10. Centerdata. 2016b. Het Nationaal Referendumonderzoek 2016. https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/648. Last visited 28 February 2018.
  11. Dalton, R.J., W.P. Burklin, and A. Drummond. 2001. Public opinion and direct democracy. Journal of Democracy 12 (4): 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawkins, K.A. 2009. Is Chávez populist?. Comparative Political Studies: Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, K., S. Riding, and C. Mudde. 2012. Measuring populist attitudes. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series. http://www.concepts-methods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PC_55_Hawkins_Riding_Mudde.pdf. Last accessed 28 August 2016.
  14. Hibbing, J., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. I&O Research. 2016. Rapport. Het referendum over de associatie-overeenkomst met Oekraïne. http://www.ioresearch.nl/Portals/0/RAPPORT%20Oekraine-referendum%20maart%202016.pdf. Last visited 25 August 2016.
  16. Immerzeel, T., and M. Pickup. 2015. Populist radical right parties mobilizing ‘the people’? The role of populist radical right success in voter turnout. Electoral Studies 40: 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobs, K. 2011. The power or the people. Direct Democratic and Electoral Reforms in Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands. Unpublished Dissertation.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, K. Forthcoming. Referendums in times of discontent. The Dutch 2016 referendum in comparative perspective. Acta Politica.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, K., and N. Spierings. 2010. District magnitude and voter turnout a multi-level analysis of self-reported voting in the 32 Dominican Republic districts. Electoral Studies 29 (4): 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lavezzolo, S., and L. Ramiro. 2017. Stealth democracy and the support for new and challenger parties. European Political Science Review 8 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  21. Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition 39 (4): 542–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NRO (2016). Nationaal Referendumonderzoek 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Pauwels, T. 2014. Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium. Germany and The Netherlands: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PVV. 2016. PVV presenteert conceptverkiezingsprogramma op facebook. http://pvv.nl/index.php/36-fj-related/geert-wilders/9239-pvv-presenteert-conceptverkiezingsprogramma-op-facebook.html. Last visited 31 August 2016.
  28. Qvortrup, M. (ed.). 2014. Referendums around the world. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Reidy, T., and J. Suiter. 2015. New directions in referendums, politics and campaigns. Electoral Studies 38: 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rooduijn, M. 2013. A Populist Zeitgeist? The Impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  31. Rooduijn, M., and T. Pauwels. 2011. Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics 34 (6): 1272–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rooduijn, M., W. Van Der Brug, and S.L. De Lange. 2016. Expressing or fuelling discontent? Therelationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies 43: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schuck, A.R., and C.H. de Vreese. 2009. Reversed mobilization in referendum campaigns how positive news framing can mobilize the skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (1): 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smets, K., and C. Van Ham. 2013. The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies 32 (2): 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spruyt, B., G. Keppens, and F. Van Droogenbroeck. 2016. Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taggart, P. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Van Hauwaert, S.M., and S. Van Kessel. 2017. Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Webb, P. 2013. Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52 (6): 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zaslove, A. 2008. Here to stay? Populism as a new party type. European review 16 (3): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristof Jacobs
    • 1
  • Agnes Akkerman
    • 1
  • Andrej Zaslove
    • 1
  1. 1.IMRRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations