Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 584–606 | Cite as

Does inequality erode generalized trust? Evidence from Romanian youths

  • Paul SumEmail author
  • Gabriel Bădescu
Original Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Generalized trust is a critical component of liberal democratic citizenship. We evaluate the extent to which exposure to socioeconomic inequality erodes trust among Romanian youths. Using national survey data of Romanian eighth-grade and high school students, we evaluate this effect as a product of socioeconomic diversity within the classroom, controlling for the social status of the students as well as socioeconomic inequality within the community where the school is located. Our analysis shows that generalized trust is higher among older adolescents. However, despite this maturing effect, youth exposed to greater levels of socioeconomic diversity have significantly lower levels of trust. The effect is particularly acute for students in the ninth grade controlling for community diversity and polarization. The result reinforces the idea that generalized trust develops early in one’s life and is quite stable, although a major life transformation, such as entering high school, may alter trust depending on the social context.

Keywords

Generalized trust Economic inequality Adolescents Romania Education 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., S. Naidu, P. Restrepo, and J.A. Robinson. 2013. Democracy, redistribution and inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 19746 JEL No. O10, P16, Retrieved May 17, 2017 from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19746.pdf.
  2. Alesina, A., and E. La Ferrara. 2005. Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature 43 (3): 762–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andolina, M.W., K. Jenkins, C. Zukin, and S. Keeter. 2003. Habits from home, lessons from school: influences on youth engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2): 275–280.Google Scholar
  4. Baltes, P.B., and J.R. Nesselroade. 1984. Paradigm lost and paradigm regained: critique of Dannefer’s portrayal of life-span developmental psychology. American Sociological Review 49 (6): 841–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, L. 2016. Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benner, A.D. 2011. The transition to high school: current knowledge, future directions. Educational Psychology Review 23 (3): 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benner, A.D., and S. Graham. 2009. The transition to high school as a development process among multiethnic urban youth. Child Development 80 (2): 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C. 2007. Determinants of generalized trust: a cross-country comparison. Public Choice 130 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgonovi, F. and Burns, T. 2015. The educational roots of trust. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 119, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved May 17, 2017 from  https://doi.org/10.1787/5js1kv85dfvd-en.
  10. Borgonovi, F., and A. Pokropek. 2017. Birthplace diversity, incomes inequality and education gradients in generalised trust: the relevance of cognitive skills in 29 countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 164, OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/f16a8bae-en. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.
  11. Bourdieu, P., and J.C. Passerson. 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Bourguignon, F. 2015. The globalization of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breen, R., and J.O. Jonsson. 2005. Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cirino, P.T., C.E. Chin, R.A. Sevcik, M. Wolf, M. Lovett, and R.D. Morris. 2002. Measuring socioeconomic status: reliability and preliminary validity for different approaches. Assessment 9 (2): 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J.S., and B.A. Smerdon. 2010. Tightening the dropout tourniquet: easing the transition from middle to high school. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 53 (3): 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Colquitt, J.A., B.A. Scott, and J.A. LePine. 2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 909–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa, A.C. 2000. A matter of trust: effects on the performance and effectiveness of teams in organizations. Utrecht: Kurt Lewin Instituut.Google Scholar
  19. Deletant, D. 2015. Romania’s commitment to the rule of law. In Post-communist Romania at twenty-five, ed. L. Stan, and D. Vancea, 229–239. Lanham, Boulder, London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  20. Diamond, L. 1999. Developing democracy: toward consolidation. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, L. 2015. Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dinesen, P.T., and K.M. Sønderskov. 2018. Ethnic diversity and social trust: a critical review of the literature and suggestions for a research agenda. In The Oxford handbook on social and political trust, ed. E.M. Uslaner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dinesen, P.T., and K.M. Sønderskov. 2012. Trust in a time of increasing diversity: on the relationship between ethnic heterogeneity and generalized trust in Denmark from 1979 until today. Scandinavian Political Studies 35 (4): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elder Jr., G.H., M.K. Johnson, and R. Crosnoe. 2003. The emergence and development of life course theory. In Handbook of the life course, ed. J. Mortimer, and M. Shanahan, 3–22. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Commission. 2017. Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income—EU-SILC survey. Eurostat: Products Data Sets, Retrieved May 17, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tessi190.
  26. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fukuyama, F., L. Diamond, and M. Plattner (eds.). 2012. Poverty, inequality, and democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gallagher, T. 2005. Modern Romania: the end of communism, the failure of democratic reform, and the theft of a Nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Greskovits, B. 2015. The hollowing and backsliding of democracy in East Central Europe. Global Policy 6 (S1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gustavsson, M., and H. Jordahl. 2008. Inequality and trust in Sweden: some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics 92 (1–2): 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heyns, B. 2005. Emerging inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huber, E., and J.D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the left: social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hollis, M. 1998. Trust within reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamal, A., and I. Nooruddin. 2010. The democratic utility of trust: a cross-national analysis. The Journal of Politics 72 (1): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jung, F., and U. Sunde. 2014. Income, inequality, and the stability of democracy: another look at the Lipset hypothesis. European Journal of Political Economy 35: 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kang, W. 2015. Inequality, the welfare system and satisfaction with democracy in South Korea. International Political Science Review 36 (5): 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keeley, B. 2015. Income inequality: the gap between rich and poor. OECD Insights. Paris: OECD Publishing, Retrieved May 17, 2017 from  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246010-en.
  38. Knack, S., and P. Keefer. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knack, S., and P.J. Zak. 2002. Building trust: public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme Court Economic Review 10: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurlantzick, J. 2011. The great democracy meltdown. New Republic 242 (8): 12.Google Scholar
  41. Langenkamp, A.G. 2009. Following different pathways: social integration, achievement, and the transition to high school. American Journal of Education 116 (1): 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Layte, R. 2012. The association between income inequality and mental health: testing status anxiety, social capital, and neo-materialist explanations. European Sociological Review 28 (4): 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leigh, A. 2006. Trust, inequality and ethnic heterogeneity. Economic Record 82 (258): 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Letki, N. 2006. Investigating the roots of civic morality: trust, social capital, and institutional performance. Political Behavior 28 (4): 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2015. The myth of democratic recession. The Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marschall, M.J., and D. Stolle. 2004. Race and the city: neighborhood context and the development of generalized trust. Political Behavior 26 (2): 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McAllister, D.J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59.Google Scholar
  48. Mudde, C. 2013. Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what? European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newton, K. 1999. Social capital and democracy in modern Europe. In Social Capital and European Democracy, ed. J. Van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, and P. Whiteley, 3–24. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Niemi, R.G., and B.I. Sobieszek. 1977. Political socialization. Annual Review of Sociology 3: 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olivera, J. 2015. Changes in inequality and generalized trust in Europe. Social Indicators Research 124 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Permanyer, I., and C. D’Ambrosio. 2015. Measuring social polarization with ordinal and categorical data. Journal of Public Economic Theory 17 (3): 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prior, M. 2010. You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. The Journal of Politics 72 (3): 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Puddington, A. 2010. The erosion accelerates. Journal of Democracy 21 (2): 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Rahn, W.M., and J.E. Transue. 1998. Social trust and value change: the decline of social capital in American youth, 1976–1995. Political Psychology 19 (3): 545–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roine, J., and D. Waldenström. 2015. Long-run trends in the distribution of income and wealth. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A.B. Atkinson, and F. Bourguignon, 471–592. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  59. Savoia, A., J. Easaw, and A. McKay. 2010. Inequality, democracy, and institutions: a critical review of recent research. World Development 38 (2): 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shanahan, M.J. 2000. Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 667–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shapiro, S.P. 1987. The social control of interpersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology 93 (3): 623–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Six, F. 2005. The trouble with trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stan, S., and R. Erne. 2014. Explaining Romanian labor migration: from development gaps to development trajectories. Labor History 55 (1): 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stiglitz, J.E. 2012. The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  65. Stolle, D., and M. Hooghe. 2004. The roots of social capital: attitudinal and network mechanisms in the relation between youth and adult indicators of social capital. Acta Politica 39 (4): 422–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sullivan, J.L., and J.E. Transue. 1999. The psychological underpinnings of democracy: a selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. UNICEF Romania. 2014. Annual Report, Retrieved May 16, 2017 from https://www.unicef.org/about/annualreport/files/Romania_Annual_Report_2014.pdf.
  68. Uslaner, E.M. 2002. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Uslaner, E.M. 2003. Trust and civic engagement in East and West. In Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, ed. G. Bădescu, and E.M. Uslaner, 81–94. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Uslaner, E.M. 2011. Trust, diversity, and segregation in the United States and the United Kingdom. Comparative Sociology 10 (2): 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Uslaner, E.M., and M. Brown. 2005. Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research 33 (6): 868–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Warren, M.E. (ed.). 1999. Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, E.O., and L. Perrone. 1977. Marxist class categories and income inequality. American Sociological Review 42 (1): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zak, P.J., and S. Knack. 2001. Trust and growth. The Economic Journal 111 (470): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science & Public AdministrationUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Political, Administrative, and Communication SciencesBabes-Boylai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations