Sorting your way out: Perceived party positions, political knowledge, and polarization

  • Federico Vegetti
  • Zoltán Fazekas
  • Zsombor Zoltán Méder
Original Article

Abstract

Political knowledge is one of the most important constructs for political behavior research, although scholars often ignore how general knowledge translates into specific information that citizens use to evaluate the party supply. This task is even more complex in multi-party systems. We analyze the accuracy of voters’ party placements benchmarked to expert placements in 24 European multi-party systems focusing on the role of general political knowledge given party system characteristics. Our results indicate that while more knowledgeable voters view the party system more similarly to experts, this difference is substantially smaller in ideologically polarized party systems. Thus, the required general political knowledge for an accurate ordering of parties on the left–right scale is much lower in polarized party systems. Our findings have important implications for our understanding of how competition can fulfill its function of linking citizens and political elites at the moment of democratic elections.

Supplementary material

41269_2016_29_MOESM1_ESM.docx (764 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 764 kb)

References

  1. Adams, J., Merrill, S. and Grofman, B. (2005) A unified theory of party competition. A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Althaus, S. L. (1998) Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review 92: 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, M. R. and Nagler, J. (2004) Party system compactness: Measurement and consequences. Political Analysis 12: 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, J. R. (2012) The electoral consequences of voter ignorance. Electoral Studies 31: 796–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M. and Vachudova, M. A. (2012) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics EarlyView.Google Scholar
  6. Barabas, J. and Jerit, J. (2009) Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science 53: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barabas, J., Jerit, J., Pollock, W. and Rainey, C. (2014) The question (s) of political knowledge. American Political Science Review.Google Scholar
  8. Bartels, L. M. (1996) Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40: 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and McPhee, W. N. (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brody, R. A. and Page, B. I. (1972) The assessment of policy voting. American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burak, C. (2014) Weighted distances between preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 51: 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carmines, E. G. and Stimson, J. A. (1986) On the structure and sequence of issue evolution. American Political Science Review 80(03): 901–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Converse, P. (1964) The nature and origin of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A. B. and Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009) Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication 24: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, R. J. (2008) The quantity and the quality of party systems. Comparative Political Studies 41: 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalton, R. J. (2011) Left-right orientations, context, and voting choices. In R. J. Dalton & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Citizens, Context, and Choice. How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1993) Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science 37: 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dolan, K. (2011) Do women and men know different things? Measuring gender differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics 73: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Downs, A. (1957) An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper; Row.Google Scholar
  21. Enders, C. K. and Tofighi, D. (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods 12: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ensley, M. J. (2007) Candidate divergence, ideology, and vote choice in U.S. Senate elections. American Politics Research, 35: 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fazekas, Z. and Méder, Z. S. (2013) Proximity and directional theory compared: Taking discriminant positions seriously in multi-party systems. Electoral Studies 32: 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortunato, D. and Stevenson, R. T. (2013) Perceptions of partisan ideologies: The effect of coalition participation. American Journal of Political Science 57: 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fortunato, D., Stevenson, R. T. and Vonnahme, G. (2015) Context and political knowledge: Explaining cross-national variation in partisan left-right knowledge. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  26. Fraile, M. (2013) Do information-rich contexts reduce knowledge inequalities? The contextual determinants of political knowledge in Europe. Acta Politica 48: 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galston, W. A. (2001) Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gelman, A. (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 1: 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D. B. (2014) Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gilens, M. (2001) Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gordon, S. B. and Segura, G. M. (1997) Cross-national variation in the political sophistication of individuals: Capability or choice? Journal of Politics 59: 126–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grönlund, K. and Milner, H. (2006) The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 29: 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamill, R., Lodge, M. and Blake, F. (1985) The breadth, depth, and utility of class, partisan, and ideological schemata. American Journal of Political Science 29: 850–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackman, S. (2009) Bayesian analysis for the social sciences. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jerit, J., Barabas, J. and Bolsen, T. (2006) Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science 50: 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Key, V. (1966) The responsible electorate. Rationality in presidential voting 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kroh, M. (2009) The ease of ideological voting: Voter sophistication and party system complexity. In H.-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lachat, R. (2008) The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies 27: 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lachat, R. (2011) Electoral competitiveness and issue voting. Political Behavior 33: 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Litton, K. (2013) Party novelty: Conceptualization and measurement of party change. Party Politics FirstView, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  42. Luskin, R. C. (1987) Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31: 856–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luskin, R. C. (1990) Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior 12: 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mondak, J. J. and Anderson, M. R. (2004) The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics 66: 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pardos-Prado, S. and Dinas, E. (2010) Systemic polarisation and spatial voting. European Journal of Political Research 49: 759–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Popa, S. A. (2013) Political sophistication in Central and Eastern Europe: How can parties help? Party Politics.Google Scholar
  47. Popkin, S. L. and Dimock, M. A. (1999) Political knowledge and citizen competence. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Soltan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (pp. 117–146). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Prior, M. and Lupia, A. (2008) Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science 52: 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabinowitz, G. and MacDonald, S. E. (1989) A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review, 83 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaker, L. (2012) Local political knowledge and assessments of citizen competence. Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh, S. P. and Roy, J. (2014) Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting. Electoral Studies 34: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stegmueller, D. (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57: 748–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van der Eijk, C., Schmitt, H. and Binder, T. (2005) Left-right orientation and party choice. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), The European Voter (pp. 167–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S., Franklin, M. and Sapir, E. V. (2009) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study (v2). doi:10.4232/1.10202
  55. Vegetti, F. (2014) From political conflict to partisan evaluations: How citizens assess party ideology and competence in polarized elections. Electoral Studies 35: 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weith, P. T. and Toka, G. (2011) The influence of question format on the reliability of political knowledge scales. Conference paper Political Psychology Networking Conference for the Post-Communist Region, Budapest.Google Scholar
  57. Zaller, J. R. (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Vegetti
    • 1
  • Zoltán Fazekas
    • 2
  • Zsombor Zoltán Méder
    • 3
  1. 1.Central European UniversityDepartment of Political ScienceBudapestHungary
  2. 2.University of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Singapore University of Technology and DesignSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations