Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 436–460 | Cite as

Gaining voice in the mass media: The effect of parties’ strategies on party–issue linkages in election news coverage

  • Nicolas MerzEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The mass media are central in providing citizens with information on political parties and issues. This study deals with the question of how the mass media link issues to parties in their news coverage. Such party–issue linkages in the media are crucial if parties want to gain or maintain ownership of political issues. The study tests hypotheses according to which journalists use parties’ issue emphases and issue positions as a heuristic to decide which party to give voice to when debating certain issues. It combines and analyzes datasets based on electoral programs and election news coverage of national elections in Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the UK between 1991 and 2007. It finds that journalists link issues with parties that emphasized these issues in the past or increased their emphasis at the current election. In contrast, issue positioning does not effect party–issue linkages. These findings contradict past research on the reflection of parties’ issue emphasis in media coverage, and have important implications for parties’ issue strategies, party competition, and the role of mass media in democracy.

Keywords

political parties issue emphasis electoral programs media coverage 

References

  1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2014) Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts – How green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science 46: 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. (2012) Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, J., Ezrow, L. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2011) Is anybody listening? Evidence that voters do not respond to European parties’ policy statements during elections. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alonso, S. and da Fonseca, S. C. (2012) Immigration, left and right. Party Politics 18(6): 865–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amat, F. and Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2014) The legislative dynamics of political decentralization in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies 47(6): 820–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansolabehere, S. and Iyengar, S. (1994) Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly 58(3): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandenburg, H. (2006) Party strategy and media bias: A quantitative analysis of the 2005 UK election campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 16(2): 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, P. T. and Williams, J. T. (2001) A linear poisson autoregressive model: The poisson AR(p) model. Political Analysis 9(2): 164–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in 23 Democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bélanger, E. and Meguid, B. M. (2008) Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies 27(3): 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobb, R., Ross, J.-K. and Ross, M. H. (1976) Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review 70(01): 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlberg, S. and Martinsson, J. (2015) Changing issue ownership through policy communication. West European Politics 38(4): 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalton, R. J. and McAllister, I. (2014) Random walk or planned excursion? Comparative political studies: Continuity and change in the left-right positions of political parties. Comparative Political Studies 48: 759–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damore, D. F. (2004) The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vreese, C. H. (2004) The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81(1): 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011) Mapping parties’ issue Agenda in different channels of campaign communication: A wild goose chase? Javnost - The Public 18(1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez-Vazquez, P. (2014) And yet it moves: The effect of election platforms on party policy images. Comparative Political Studies 47(14): 1919–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geys, B. (2012) Success and failure in electoral competition: Selective issue emphasis under incomplete issue ownership. Electoral Studies 31(2): 406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green-Pedersen, C. (2007) The growing importance of issue competition: The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies 55(3): 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green-Pedersen, C. and Mortensen, P. B. (2010) Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research 49(2): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green-Pedersen, C., Mortensen, P. B. and Thesen, G. (2015) The Incumbency Bonus Revisited: Causes and Consequences of Media Dominance. British Journal of Political Science 6: 1–18.Google Scholar
  24. Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen, M. E. (2008) Back to the archives? A critique of the Danish part of the manifesto dataset. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayes, D. (2008) Party reputations, journalistic expectations: How issue ownership influences election news. Political Communication 25(4): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helbling, M. and Tresch, A. (2011) Measuring party positions and issue salience from media coverage: Discussing and cross-validating new indicators. Electoral Studies 30(1): 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helfer, L. and Aelst, P. V. (2015) What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication 33: 1–19.Google Scholar
  29. Holian, D. B. (2004) He’s stealing my issues! Clinton’s crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Political Behavior 26(2): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopmann, D. N., de Vreese, C. H. and Albaek, E. (2011) Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained: The logics of political power and the media market. Journal of Communication 61(2): 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., de Vreese, C. and Albæk, E. (2010) Effects of Election News Coverage: How Visibility and Tone Influence Party Choice. Political Communication 27(4): 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitschelt, H. (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleinnijenhuis, J. and Pennings, P. (2001) Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes, media coverage and voter perceptions. In M. Laver (Ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Kleinnijenhuis, J. and Rietberg, E. M. (1995) Parties, media, the public and the economy: Patterns of societal agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research 28(1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. and Wueest, B. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lacewell, O. P. and Werner, A. (2013) Coder training: Key to enhancing coding reliability and estimate validity. In: A. Volkens, J. Bara, I. Budge, M. D. McDonald and H.-D. Klingemann (eds.) Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts. Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Laver, M. and Garry, J. (2000) Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44: 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S. and Laver, M. (2011) Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Midtbø, T. (2011) Explaining media attention for norwegian MPs: A new modelling approach. Scandinavian Political Studies 34(3): 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mikhaylov, S., Laver, M. and Benoit, K. R. (2012) Coder reliability and misclassification in the human coding of party manifestos. Political Analysis 20(1): 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammel, M. and Semetko, H. A. (1999) On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Petrocik, J. R. (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L. and Hansen, G. J. (2003) Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly 118(4): 599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson, D. B. (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Schoenbach, K., De Ridder, J. and Lauf, E. (2001) Politicians on TV news: Getting attention in Dutch and German election campaigns. European Journal of Political Research 39(4): 519–531.Google Scholar
  48. Schuck, A. R. T., Xezonakis, G., Elenbaas, M., Banducci, S. A. and de Vreese, C. H. (2011) Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: The 2009 European parliamentary elections: Special Symposium: Electoral democracy in the European Union. Electoral Studies 30(1): 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schuck, A. R. T., Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., Elenbaas, M., Azrout, R., van Spanje, J., et al. (2013) Explaining campaign news coverage: How medium, time, and context explain variation in the media framing of the 2009 European parliamentary elections. Journal of Political Marketing 12(1): 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semetko, H. and Valkenburg, P. (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50(2): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slothuus, R. and de Vreese, C. H. (2010) Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. The Journal of Politics 72(03): 630–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Staab, J. F. (1990) The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication 5(4): 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strömbäck, J. (2005) In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies 6(3): 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tresch, A., Lefevere, J. and Walgrave, S. (2013) Steal me if you can!: The impact of campaign messages on associative issue ownership. Party Politics 21: 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tresch, A. (2009) Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in swiss newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14(1): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van der Pas, D. J. and Vliegenthart, R. (2015) Do media respond to party conflict? Debates on European integration in British, Dutch and German party manifestos and newspapers, 1987–2006. Political Studies 64: 260–278.Google Scholar
  57. Volkens, A., P. Lehmann, N. Merz, S. Regel, and A. Werner (2014) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2014a. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
  58. Wagner, M. (2012) When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance. European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 64–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wagner, M. and Meyer, T. M. (2014) Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics 5: 1019–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. and Tresch, A. (2012) The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4): 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walgrave, S. and de Swert, K. (2007) Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party Identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12(1): 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walgrave, S. and van Aelst, P. (2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication 56(1): 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. and Nuytemans, M. (2009) Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication 26(2): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walgrave, S., Tresch, A. and Lefevere, J. (2015) The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics 38(4): 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitten, G. D. and Williams, L. K. (2011) Buttery guns and welfare hawks: The politics of defense spending in advanced industrial democracies. American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wueest, B., Höglinger, D. and P. de Caes (2012) Documentation and Codebook for the National Election Studies in the Project Political Change in a Globalizing World.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WZB Berlin Social Science Research CenterBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations