Advertisement

Hidden politics of power and governmentality in transitional justice and peacebuilding: The problem of ‘bringing the local back in’

  • Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik
Original Article

Abstract

This paper examines ‘the local’ in peacebuilding by examining how ‘local’ transitional justice projects can become spaces of power inequalities. The paper argues that focusing on how ‘the local’ contests or interacts with ‘the international’ in peacebuilding and post-conflict contexts obscures contestations and power relations amongst different local actors, and how inequalities and power asymmetries can be entrenched and reproduced through internationally funded local projects. The paper argues that externally funded projects aimed at emancipating ‘locals’ entrench inequalities and create local elites that become complicit in governing the conduct and participation of other less empowered ‘locals’. The paper thus proposes that specific local actors—often those in charge of externally funded peacebuilding projects—should also be conceptualised as governing agents: able to discipline and regulate other local actors’ voices and their agency, and thus (re)construct ideas about what ‘the local’ is, or is not.

Keywords

Governmentality Local Peacebuilding Power Transitional justice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Catherine Baker, Maria O’Reilly, Laura Martin, Henry Redwood, Pol Bargues Pedreny, Louis Monroy Santander and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. A version of this paper was presented at the International Studies Association Conference in New Orleans, 2015. In November 2014, I was invited by the RECOM coalition to attend the 10th Forum on Transitional Justice. I am grateful to the hosts for their generosity. Although I refer to that event in this paper, the information I use is publicly available from http://recom.link.

References

  1. Autessere, Severine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baines, Erin, and Beth Stewart. 2011. “I Cannot Accept What I Have Not Done”: Storytelling, Gender and Transitional Justice. Journal of Human Rights Practice 3 (3): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, Catherine, and Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik. 2016. Mapping the Nexus of Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding July: 1–21,  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2016.1199483.
  4. Bargues Pedreny, Pol. 2016. False Promise: Local Ownership and the Denial of Self-Government. In Peacebuilding in Crisis: Rethinking Paradigms and Practices of Transnational Cooperation, ed. Tobias Debiel, Thomas Held, and Ulrich Schneckener, 227–239. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bilgin, Pinar. 2008. Thinking Past “Western” IR? Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Björkdahl, Annika, and Ivan Gusic. 2015. “Global” Norms and “Local” Agency: Frictional Peacebuilding in Kosovo. Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (3): 265–287.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daly, Erin. 2008. Truth Skepticism: An Inquiry Into the Value of Truth in Times of Transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (1): 23–41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, James. 2014. Cultures of Democracy in Serbia and Bulgaria: How Ideas Shape Publics. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Ekern, Stener. 2010. The Modernizing Bias of Human Rights: Stories of Mass Killings and Genocide in Central America. Journal of Genocide Research 12 (3–4): 219–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2010.528996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englund, Harri. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Englund, Harri. 2004. Towards a Critique of Rights Talk in New Democracies: The Case of Legal Aid in Malawi. Discourse & Society 15 (5): 527–551.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504038944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EEAS (European Union External Action Service). n.d. The EU’s Policy Framework on Support to Transitional Justice. Available at https://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/the_eus_policy_framework_on_support_to_transitional_justice.pdf [last accessed on 19 December, 2017].
  13. Fletcher, Laurel.E., and Harvey M. Weinstein. 2015. Writing Transitional Justice: An Empirical Evaluation of Transitional Justice Scholarship in Academic Journals. Journal of Human Rights Practice 7 (2): 177–198.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabay, Clive, and Carl Death. 2012. Building States and Civil Society in Africa: Liberal Interventions and Global Governmentality. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, Lisa. 2015. The Journey from Global to Local: Norm Promotion, Contestation and Localisation in Post-War Kosovo. Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (S3): 311–336.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guthrey, Holly L. 2016. Local Norms and Truth Telling: Examining Experienced Incompatibilities within Truth Commissions of Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste. Contemporary Pacific 28 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helms, Elissa. 2013. Innocence and Victimhood: Gender, Nation and Women’s Activism in Postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hirblinger, Andreas T., and Claudia Simons. 2015. The Good, the Bad, and the Powerful: Representations of the “Local” in Peacebuilding. Security Dialogue 46 (5): 422–439.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615580055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hronesova, Jessie. 2016. Might Makes Right: War-Related Payments in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isleyen, Beste. 2015. Governing the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: The European Union Partnership for Peace. Security Dialogue 46 (3): 256–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joseph, Jonathan. 2010. The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 223–246.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kappler, Stefanie. 2015. The Dynamic Local: Delocalisation and (Re-)Localisation in the Search for Peacebuilding Identity. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 875–889.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1025740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kappler, Stefanie, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2011. Peacebuilding and Culture in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Resistance or Emancipation? Security Dialogue 42 (3): 261–278.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611405377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kent, Lia. 2011. Local Memory Practices in East Timor: Disrupting Transitional Justice Narratives. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5 (3): 434–455.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijr016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurki, Milja. 2011. Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion: The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Construction of Democratic Civil Societies. International Political Sociology 5 (4): 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lai, Daniela. 2016. Transitional Justice and its Discontents: Socioeconomic Justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Limits of International Intervention. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, and Stefanie Kappler. 2016. What Attachment to Peace? Exploring the Normative and Material Dimensions of Local Ownership in Peacebuilding. Review of International Studies March: 1–20,  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210516000061.
  28. Lemke, Thomas. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism 14 (3): 49–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leonardsson, Hanna, and Gustav Rudd. 2015. The “Local Turn” in Peacebuilding: A Literature Review of Effective and Emancipatory Local Peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 825–839.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundy, Patricia, and Mark McGovern. 2008. Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice From the Bottom Up. Journal of Law and Society 35 (2): 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAuliffe, Padraig. 2017. Reflections of the Nexus Between Justice and Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (2): 245–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1287636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2016. What Do We Mean When We Use the Term “Local”? Imagining and Framing the Local and International in Relation to Peace and Order. In Peacebuilding in Crisis: Rethinking Paradigms and Practices of Transnational Cooperation Abingdon, ed. Tobias Debiel, Thomas Held, and Ulrich Schneckener, 193–209. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2015. Where Is the Local? Critical Localism and Peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 840–856.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1045482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2013. The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mandligozi, Tshepo. 2010. On Transitional Justice Entrepreneurs and the Production of Victims. Journal of Human Rights Practice 2 (2): 208–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millar, Gearoid. 2016. For Whom Do Local Peace Processes Function? Maintaining Control Through Conflict Management. Cooperation and Conflict 52(3): 293–308. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716671757 [last accessed on 21 December, 2017].
  37. Millar, Gearoid. 2011. Local Evaluations of Justice Through Truth Telling in Sierra Leone: Postwar Needs and Transitional Justice. Human Rights Review 12 (4): 515–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0195-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Millar, Gearoid, and Jesse Leccy. 2016. Disciplinary Divides in Post-Conflict Justice and Peace: Tracking If and How we Share Ideas. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McEvoy, Kieran, and Lorna McGregor (eds.). 2008. Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle. American Anthropologist 108 (1): 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moon, Claire. 2006. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies 15 (2): 257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663906063582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagy, Rosemary. 2008. Transitional Justice as Global Project: Critical Reflections. Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena. 2013a. Serbian Civil Society as an Exclusionary Space: NGOs, the Public and “Coming to Terms with the Past”. In Civil Society and Transitions in the Balkans Basingstoke, ed. Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic, Denisa Kostovicova, and James Ker-Lindsay, 210–229. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena. 2013b. The “Silent Dilemma” of Transitional Justice: Silencing and Coming to Terms with the Past in Serbia. International Journal of Transitional Justice 7(2): 328–347. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt011 [last accessed on 19 December, 2017].
  45. Paffenholz, Thania. 2015. Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 857–874.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pouligny, Beatrice. 2005. Civil Society and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Ambiguities of International Programmes Aimed at Building “New” Societies. Security Dialogue 36 (4): 495–510.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605060448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pugh, Michael. 2011. Local Agency and Political Economies of Peacebuilding. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 11 (2): 308–320.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.01113.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Randazzo, Elisa. 2016. The Paradoxes of the “Everyday”: Scrutinising the Local Turn in Peace Building. Third World Quarterly January: 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1120154.
  49. Renner, Judith. 2015. Producing the Subjects of Reconciliation: The Making of Sierra Leoneans as Victims and Perpetrators of Past Human Rights Violations. Third World Quarterly 36 (6): 1110–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1047197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Richmond, Oliver P. 2015. The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive? Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 50–68.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836714537053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richmond, Oliver P. 2011. De-Romanticising the Local, De-Mystifying the International: Hybridity in Timor Leste and the Solomon Islands. Pacific Review 24 (1): 115–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2010.546873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richmond, Oliver P. 2009. Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3 (3): 324–344.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970903086719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richmond, Oliver, P., and Audra Mitchell. 2011. Introduction. In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism, ed. Oliver, P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  54. Sampson, Steven. 2011. Weclome to Aidland! In Wish You Were Here!, 60–63, ed. Nynne Haugaard and Nikolaj Kilsmark. Revolver Publishing, available at http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5613703/2426056.pdf [last accessed on 21 December, 2017].
  55. Sampson, Steven. 1996. The Social Life of Projects: Importing Civil Society to Albania. In Civil Society: Challenging Western Models, ed. Chris Hann, and Elizabeth Dunn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Selby, Jan. 2007. Engaging Foucault: Discourse, Liberal Governance and the Limits of Foucauldian IR. International Relations 21 (3): 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharp, Dustin N. 2014. Addressing Dilemmas of the Global and the Local in Transitional Justice. Emory International Law Review 29 (December): 71–117.Google Scholar
  58. Spoerri, Marlene. 2015. Engineering Revolution: the Paradox of Democracy Promotion in Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  59. Stepakoff, Shanee, G. Shawn Reynolds, Simon Charters, and Nicola Henry. 2014. Why Testify? Witnesses. Motivations for Giving Evidence in a War Crimes Tribunal in Sierra Leone’, International Journal of Transitional Justice 8 (3): 426–451.Google Scholar
  60. Subotic, Jelena. 2015. Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation on the Ground: Normative Divergence in the Western Balkans. Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (S3): 361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tagma, Halit Mustafa, Elif Kalaycioglu, and Emel Akcali. 2013. “Taming” Arab Social Movements: Exporting Neoliberal Governmentality. Security Dialogue 44 (5–6): 375–392.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613500512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, David. 2013. Truth Under the Avocado Trees. Local Needs and Burundi’s TRC: Whither the Truth? Journal of Eastern African Studies 7 (3): 450–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2013.770679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vetta, Theodora. 2009. “Democracy Building” in Serbia: The NGO Effect. Southeastern Europe 33 (1): 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Visoka, Gëzim. 2011. International Governance and Local Resistance in Kosovo: The Thin Line Between Ethical, Emancipatory and Exclusionary Politics. Irish Studies in International Affairs 22 (1): 99–125.  https://doi.org/10.3318/isia.2011.22.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vogel, Birte. 2016. Civil Society Capture: Top-Down Interventions From Below? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding June: 1–18,  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2016.1192786.
  66. Vrasti, Wanda. 2011. Universal but Not Truly “Global”: Governmentality, Economic Liberalism, and the International. Review of International Studies 39 (1): 49–69.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Languages and Social SciencesAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations