Advertisement

Blaming the Polish plumber: phantom agents, invisible workers, and the liberal arena

  • Dorothy NoyesEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The French ‘no’ vote to the European constitutional referendum of 2005 was broadly attributed by political elites and mainstream media to popular fear of the Polish plumber. This phantom of globalised neoliberal labour does not, however, emerge from vernacular culture but from a deep-rooted liberal imaginary that constitutes the autonomous individual through repudiation of both intimate and foreign Others. This paper proposes the concept of phantom agents as a mechanism through which accredited political actors seek to account for the exclusions of the liberal arena and, more concretely, deflect blame for bad outcomes from themselves onto voters. Tracing the circulation and afterlife of the plumber figure through political performances across French and Anglo-American arenas, I argue that the normative chain of agencies sustaining liberal democracies—reciprocal attributions of praise and blame among representatives, media, and voters—is discredited by phantom attributions that constrain the visibility of living working-class actors and impede their access to normative political agency as liberal individuals. Accordingly, excluded actors may instead seize agency within the political arena through the ‘acting out’ of phantom personae.

Keywords

Blame European Union Liberal imaginary Phantom agency Polish plumber Working class 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Laurent-Sébastien Fournier, Christian Reus-Smit, Erik Ringmar, the participants of the Frankfurt workshop and ISA panel from which this special issue emerged, two anonymous JIRD reviewers, and this issue’s co-editors, especially Tobias Wille for wise and patient counsel.

References

  1. Agence France Presse. 2005a. Lang et Cohn-Bendit dénoncent “les mensonges” et la “bêtise ambiante” [Lang and Cohn-Bendit Denounce “Lies” and “Pervasive Idiocy”], 24 May. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Agence France Presse. 2005b. Meeting européen du PS: “N’ayez pas peur du plombier polonais” [European Meeting of the PS: “Don’t be Afraid of the Polish Plumber”], 18 May. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Agence France Presse. 2005c. La CGT prive d’éléctricité la résidence sécondaire nordiste de M. Bolkestein [The CGT Deprives Mr. Bolkestein’s Second Residence in the Nord of Electricity], 13 April. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  4. Agence France Presse. 2005d. Les soucis de Frits Bolkestein avec les plombiers du Nord [Frits Bolkestein’s Worries About the Plumbers in the Nord], 10 April. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Alcañiz, Isabella, and Timothy Hellwig. 2011. Who’s to Blame? The Distribution of Responsibility in Developing Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 41: 389–411.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arendt, Hannah. 1958/1998. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, Martin. 2005. Polish Plumber Symbolic of All French Fear About Constitution. Financial Times, 28 May. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9d5d703a-cf14-11d9-8cb5-00000e2511c8.html?ft_site=falcon&desktop=true#axzz4kTKtlHeA. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
  8. Bauman, Richard. 1977. Verbal Art as Performance. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Richard. 1986. Performance and Honor in 13th-century Iceland. Journal of American Folklore 99: 131–150.  https://doi.org/10.2307/539970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bendix, Regina F., and John Bendix (eds.). 2004. Sleepers, Moles and Martyrs. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berezin, Mabel. 2006. Appropriating the NO: the French Popular Front, the Vote on the Constitution, and the “New”, April 21. PS: Political Science and Politics 39: 269–272.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berman, Marshall. 1982. All That is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity, 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  14. Brouard, Sylvain, and Vincent Tiberj. 2006. The French Referendum: The Not So Simple Act of Saying Nay. Politics and Political Science 39: 261–268.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40: 519–531.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charb. 2005a. La vengeance du référendum [The Vengeance of the Referendum]. Charlie Hebdo, 8 June.Google Scholar
  18. Charb. 2005b. La Sodome du oui, la Gomorrhe du non [The Sodom of Yes, The Gomorrah of No]. Charlie Hebdo, 7 April.Google Scholar
  19. Charlesworth, Simon. 2009. The Space of Appearances: The Constitution of the Public Realm. Space and Culture 12: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charlie Hebdo. November 2004–June 2005 Issues Accessed on Microfilm from Cornell University Library; page numbers not always legible.Google Scholar
  21. Checkel, Jeffrey, and Peter J. Katzenstein (eds.). 2009. European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dagorn, Gary. 2017. Législatives: une Assemblée plus jeune, plus paritaire, mais toujours peu représentative [Legislative Elections: A Younger and More Balanced, but Still Hardly Representative, National Assembly]. Le Monde, 19 June. http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2017/06/19/legislatives-une-assemblee-plus-jeune-plus-paritaire-mais-toujours-peu-representative_5147523_4355770.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  23. Davis, Colin. 2005. État présent: Hauntology, Spectres, and Phantoms. French Studies 59: 373–379.  https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/kni143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dayan, Daniel, and Elihu Katz. 1992. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. De Villiers, Philippe. 2015. La grande triche du oui [The Great Cheat of Yes], Interview with Philippe de Villiers. Le Figaro, 15 March. http://www.observatoiredeleurope.com/Villiers-La-grande-triche-du-oui_a134.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
  26. Deniau, Jean-François. 2006. Ces fausses peurs qui condamnent la France au ridicule [These False Fears that Condemn France to Ridicule]. Le Figaro, 12 July. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  27. Diez Medrano, José. 2009. The Public Sphere and the European Union’s Political Identity. In European Identity, ed. Jeffrey Checkel, and Peter J. Katzenstein, 81–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on Individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Edkins, Jenny. 2015. Face Politics. Abingdon, OX/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellis, Richard J. 1994. Presidential Lightning Rods: The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  31. Ellison, Ralph. 1952. The Invisible Man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. Erskine, Toni. 2008. Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency in International Relations. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Christian Reus-Smit, and Duncan Snidal, 699–707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. EuroNews. 2005. Frits Bolkestein venu braver l’hostilité française à Paris [Frits Bolkestein in Paris to Face French Hostility], French edition, 6 April. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  34. European Parliament Press Service. 2005. Avenir de l’Union. Laurent Fabius défend son “non” [Future of the Union. Laurent Fabius Defends His “No”, 28 September. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+IM-PRESS+20050926IPR00756+FR+DOC+PDF+V0//FR&language=FR. Accessed 21 Dec 2017.
  35. Freeden, Michael. 2015. Liberalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Freud, Sigmund. 1919/1958. The ‘Uncanny’. In On Creativity and the Unconscious, ed. B. Nelson, 122–161. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  37. Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gingrich, André. 2006. Nation, Status and Gender in Trouble? Exploring Some Contexts and Characteristics of Neo-nationalism in Western Europe. In Neo-Nationalism in Europe and Beyond, ed. André Gingrich, and Marcus Banks, 1–28. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  39. Hill, Jane H., and Judith T. Irvine (eds.). 1992. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. In Style in Language, ed. Thomas A. Sebeak, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, Owen. 2011. Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. Kennedy, Alan. 2005. What to Say About the “No” Vote. Sydney Morning Herald, 4 June. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  43. Kustermans, Jorg. 2011. The State as Citizen: State Personhood and Ideology. Journal of International Relations and Development 14: 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Leparmentier, Arnaud. 2015. Londres vaut bien un plombier polonais [London is Well Worth a Polish Plumber]. Le Monde, 10 June, available at LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1961/1979. Totality and Infinity (trans: Alphonso Lingis). The Hague, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Lévy, Myriam. 2005. ‘Les hollandais accusent les fabiusiens de “xénophobie”’ [The Hollandites Accuse the Fabiusites of “Xenophobia”]. Le Figaro, 14 May, available at LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  48. Lindahl, Carl. 2012. Legends of Hurricane Katrina: The Right to Be Wrong, Survivor-to-Survivor Storytelling, and Healing. Journal of American Folklore 125: 139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marie, Claude-Valentin. 1988. Entre économie et politique: le “clandestin”, une figure sociale à géométrie variable [Between Economy and Politics: The “Illegal Immigrant,” A Social Figure with Variable Geometry]. Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques 47: 75–92. http://www.revue-pouvoirs.fr/Entre-economie-et-politique-le.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  50. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1848/1977. The Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx: Selected Writings, ed. David McLellan, 221–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Maryniak, Irena. 2006. The Polish Plumber and the Image Game. Eurozine, 15 November. http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-11-15-maryniak-en.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  52. Marzinotto, Benedicta. 2006. Polish Plumber Fails to Threaten. The World Today (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 62 (5): 23.Google Scholar
  53. Michnik, Adam. 2005. Gloire au plombier polonais! [Hooray for the Polish Plumber!]. L’Express, 6 June. http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/gloire-au-plombier-polonais_485683.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  54. Milner, Henry. 2006. “YES to the Europe I Want; NO to This One”: Some Reflections on France’s Rejection of the EU Constitution. PS. Political Science and Politics 39: 257–260.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Monléon, José B. 1990. A Specter is Haunting Europe: A Sociohistorical Approach to the Fantastic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neuer, Laurence. 2013. Travailleurs détachés: les mille et un visages du plombier polonais [Detached Workers: The Thousand and One Faces of the Polish Plumber]. Le Point, 12 May. http://www.lepoint.fr/chroniqueurs-du-point/laurence-neuer/travailleurs-detaches-les-mille-et-un-visages-du-plombier-polonais-05-12-2013-1764999_56.php. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  57. Neumann, Iver B. 1999. Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Neumann, Iver B. 2001. European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus. In Constructing Europe’s Identity: The External Dimension, ed. Lars-Erik Cederman, 141–164. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  59. Noyes, Dorothy. 2000. Breaking the Social Contract. Catalan Review 14: 129–158.Google Scholar
  60. Noyes, Dorothy. 2001. Authoring the Social Drama: Suicide, Self, and Narration in a French Political Scandal. Narrative 8: 210–231.Google Scholar
  61. Noyes, Dorothy. 2016. Humble Theory: Folklore’s Grasp on Social Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Noyes, Dorothy (2015) Inimitable Examples: School Texts and the Classical Register in Contemporary French Politics. In Registers of Communication, ed. Asif Agha and Frog, Studia Fennica Linguistica 18, 210–221. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
  63. Odone, Cristina. 2005. ‘You There, Stop Slavering. Times (London), 27 June. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  64. Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Oring, Elliott. 1996. Legend, Truth, and News. In Contemporary Legend, A Reader, ed. Gillian Bennett, and Paul Smith, 325–340. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  66. Paredes, Américo. 1958. With His Pistol in His Hand: A Border Ballad and Its Hero. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  67. Piketty, Thomas. 2015. Bolkestein, pas Frankenstein [Bolkestein, Not Frankenstein]. Libération, 2 May. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/presse/Liberation020505.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
  68. Pilkington, Nathan. 2016. Five Myths About the Decline and Fall of Rome. Washington Post, 2 December. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-decline-and-fall-of-rome/2016/12/02/1c06ee5a-b682-11e6-a677-b608fbb3aaf6_story.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  69. Quatremer, Jean. 2006. Mélenchon et le plombier polonais [Mélenchon and the Polish Plumber]. blog ‘Coulisses de Bruxelles’, Libération, 25 May. http://bruxelles.blogs.liberation.fr/2006/05/25/mlenchon_et_le_/. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  70. Robequain, Lucie. 2005. Le gouvernement tente de répondre aux peurs de “dumping social” [The Government Attempts to Respond to Fears of “Social Dumping”]. Les Echos, 25 May. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  71. Sciolino, Elaine. 2005. Unlikely Hero in Europe’s Spat: The Beckoning “Polish Plumber”. New York Times, 26 June. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/26/international/europe/26poland.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  72. Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, Craig S. 2003. Chirac Upsets East Europe by Telling It to “Shut Up” on Iraq. New York Times, 18 February. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/18/international/europe/18CND-CHIRAC.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  74. Sol, R. 2005. Pour un oui ou pour un non; chronique du médiateur [For a Yes or a No; Chronicle of the Mediator]. Le Monde, 24 April. Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  75. Soltyk, Robert. 2005. Le plombier polonais en bouc émissaire [The Polish Plumber as Scapegoat] (Originally Published in Polish in Gazeta Wyborcza). Courrier International, 29 May. http://www.courrierinternational.com/article/2005/05/26/le-plombier-polonais-en-bouc-emissaire. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
  76. Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson, and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stefanova, Boyka. 2006. The “No” Vote in the French and Dutch Referenda on the EU Constitution: A Spillover of Consequences for the Wider Europe. PS. Political Science and Politics 39: 251–255.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stephan, Alexander (ed.). 2006. The Americanization of Europe: Culture, Diplomacy, and Anti-Americanism after 1945. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  79. Stern, Maria. 2011. Gender and Race in the European Security Strategy: Europe as a “Force for Good”? Journal of International Relations and Development 14: 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sztompka, Piotr. 2004. From East Europeans to Europeans: Shifting Collective Identities and Symbolic Boundaries in the New Europe. European Review 12: 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thibaudat, Jean-Marie. 2005. Le plombier polonais, fossoyeur du oui [The Polish Plumber, Gravedigger of Yes]. Libération, 11 June. http://www.liberation.fr/evenement/2005/06/11/le-plombier-polonais-fossoyeur-du-oui_523039. Accessed 4 Dec 2017.
  82. Tognazzini, Neal, and D. Justin Coates. 2016. Blame. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/blame/. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.
  83. Urciuoli, Bonnie. 2008. Skills and Selves in the New Workplace. American Ethnologist 35: 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Val, Philippe. 2005. Bon poujadisme et mauvais cholestérol [Good Poujadism and Bad Cholesterol]. Charlie Hebdo, 22 June.Google Scholar
  85. Weaver, R.Kent. 1986. The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6: 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weber, Max. 1905/1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (trans: Talcott Parsons). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  87. Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Zemmour, Eric. 2005. Paris pascaliens [Pascalian Wagers]. Le Figaro, 14 May. LexisNexis® Academic. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  89. Zevnik, Andreja. 2016. The Politics of the Face: the Scopic Regime and the (Un)masking of the Political Subject. Journal for Cultural Research 20: 122–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2015.1090656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mershon Center for International Security StudiesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations