Advertisement

Normative spaces and the UN Global Compact for transnational corporations: the norm diffusion paradox

  • Nathan AndrewsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Regime theorists argue that international regimes and institutions are based on principles, norms and decision-making procedures that constitute a set of patterned behaviours around which expectations converge. The notion of these institutionalised ‘logics of appropriateness’ has led to the proliferation of many global norms, such as the UN Global Compact, that are considered to govern the practices of multinational corporations in the extractive sector. The key question that this paper asks is, to what extent is the UN Global Compact influencing the behaviour of mining companies in Ghana — particularly the social responsibility performance of Newmont Ghana Gold Ltd and Chirano Gold Mines Ltd.? Since the existing global CSR norms thrive mainly on voluntary subscription and compliance, the overall objective of this paper is to underscore the paradox of putting a widely acclaimed arrangement such as the Global Compact into practice and its implications for the livelihoods of expected ‘norm beneficiaries’. The goal is to contribute to the literature on the nature and rationale of CSR in Ghana, as well as to improve our understanding of localised diffusion and contestations of global norms.

Keywords

CSR Ghana global norms mining communities norm diffusion UN Global Compact 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2014 International Studies Association annual convention in Toronto. It was subsequently submitted to and shortlisted for the Kari Polanyi Levitt Prize for the best student paper in international development, and therefore presented at the Canadian Association for the Study of International Development annual conference at Brock University in May 2014. My appreciation goes to the participants of these two conferences for their thoughtful comments. My gratitude goes to Joanna Harrington, Rob Aitken, Janine Brodie, the editors and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for feedback on earlier drafts. I am grateful to my research participants in several communities in Ghana whose insights have made this paper possible. I also acknowledge the financial support provided by both the Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation (Doctoral Scholarship, 2012–2015) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Vanier Scholarship, 2012–2015) to complete this research in a timely fashion.

References

  1. Akabzaa, Thomas M (2000) Boom and Dislocation: The Environmental and Social Impacts of Mining in the Wassa West District of Ghana, Accra: Third World Network-Africa.Google Scholar
  2. Akabzaa, Thomas M., J. S. Seyire and K. Afriyie (2007) The Glittering Façade: Effects of Mining Activities on Obuasi and its Surrounding Communities, Accra: Third World Network-Africa.Google Scholar
  3. Amis, Lucy, Peter Brew and Caroline Ersmarker (2005) ‘Human Rights: It Is Your Business: The Case for Corporate Engagement’, Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum. http://commdev.org/files/1154_file_Human_Rights_It_Is_Your_Business.pdf (accessed 10 December, 2013).
  4. Andrews, Nathan (2016a) ‘Challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Domestic Settings: An Exploration of Mining Regulation vis-à-vis CSR in Ghana’, Resources Policy 47: 9–17.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, Nathan (2016b) ‘A Swiss-Army Knife? A Critical Assessment of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Ghana’, Business and Society Review 121(1): 59–83.Google Scholar
  6. Andrews, Nathan (2015) ‘Digging for Survival and/or Justice?: The Drivers of Illegal Mining Activities in Western Ghana’, Africa Today 62(2): 2–24.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, Nathan (2013a) ‘Beyond the Ivory Tower: A Case for “Praxeological Deconstructionism” as a “Third Way” in IR Theorising’, Third World Quarterly 34(1): 59–76.Google Scholar
  8. Andrews, Nathan (2013b) ‘Community Expectations from Ghana’s New Oil Find: Conceptualizing Corporate Social Responsibility as a Grassroots-Oriented Process’, Africa Today 60(1): 55–75.Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, Nathan (2011) ‘Telling Tales of Conformity and Mutual Interests: The Limits of a (Neo)liberal International Order’, International Journal 66(1): 209–23.Google Scholar
  10. Ayelazuno, Jasper (2011) ‘Continuous Primitive Accumulation in Ghana: The Real-life Stories of Dispossessed Peasants in Three Mining Communities’, Review of African Political Economy 38(130): 537–50.Google Scholar
  11. Baccaro, Lucio and Valentina Mele (2011) ‘For Lack of Anything Better? International Organizations and Global Corporate Codes’, Public Administration 89(2): 451–70.Google Scholar
  12. Bartley, Tim (2007) ‘Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions’, American Journal of Sociology 113(2): 297–351.Google Scholar
  13. Björkdahl, Annika (2002) ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15(1): 9–23.Google Scholar
  14. Bremer, Jennifer Ann (2008) ‘How Global Is the Global Compact?’, Business Ethics 17 (3): 227–44.Google Scholar
  15. Cavanagh, Gerald F. (2004) ‘Global Business Ethics: Regulation, Code or Self-Restraint’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4): 625–42.Google Scholar
  16. Chatterji, Aaron K., David I. Levine and Michael W. Toffel (2009) ‘How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18(1): 125–69.Google Scholar
  17. Cortell, Andrew P. and James W. Davis (2000) ‘Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda’, International Studies Review 2(1): 65–87.Google Scholar
  18. Cortell, Andrew P. and James W. Davis (1996) ‘How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms’, International Studies Quarterly 40(4): 451–78.Google Scholar
  19. Dashwood, Hevina S. (2012) The rise of global corporate social responsibility: Mining and the spread of global norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, Gerald F., Marina V.N. Whitman and Mayer N. Zald (2008) ‘The Responsibility Paradox’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, available at http://ssir.org/images/articles/2008WI_feature_davis_whitman_zald.pdf (accessed 18 December, 2013).
  21. Deva, Surya (2006) ‘Global Compact: A Critique of the UN’s “Public-Private” Partnership for Promoting Corporate Citizenship’, Journal of International Law and Commerce 34(1): 107–51.Google Scholar
  22. Dollar, David (2005) ‘Globalization, Poverty and Inequality since 1980’, World Bank Research Observer 20(2): 145–75.Google Scholar
  23. Essah, Marcellinus, and Nathan Andrews (2016) ‘Linking or De-linking Sustainable Mining Practices and Corporate Social Responsibility? Insights from Ghana’, Resources Policy 50: 75–85.Google Scholar
  24. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (2001) ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 391–416.Google Scholar
  25. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.Google Scholar
  26. Green, Jessica F. (2013) Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hancock, Linda (2006) ‘The Advantages of a Proactive Business Response to Human Rights Reporting’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 23: 21–24.Google Scholar
  28. Hemphill, Thomas A. (2005) ‘The United Nations Global Compact’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1(3): 303–16.Google Scholar
  29. Hilson, Gavin (2007) ‘Championing the Rhetoric? “Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana’s Mining Sector”’, Greener Management International 53: 43–56.Google Scholar
  30. Hopf, Ted (2010) ‘The Logic of Habit in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–61.Google Scholar
  31. Keohane, Robert O. (2011) ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy’, Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 99–109.Google Scholar
  32. Keohane, Robert O. (2002) ‘The globalization of informal violence: Theories of world politics, and the “liberalism of fear”’, in Robert Keohane, ed., Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World, 272-286, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kell, Georg (2005) ‘The Global Compact: Selected Experiences and Reflections’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1–2): 69–79.Google Scholar
  35. Kilgour, Maureen A. (2013) ‘The Global Compact and Gender Inequality: A Work in Progress’, Business and Society 52(1): 105–34.Google Scholar
  36. Kinderman, Daniel (2012) ‘“Free Us Up So We Can be Responsible!” The Co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010’, Socio-Economic Review 10(1): 29–57.Google Scholar
  37. Kinross Gold Corporation (2011) Taking Responsibility, 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, available at http://takingresponsibility2011.kinross.com/files/8013/5048/7218/Kinross_2011_CR_Report.pdf (accessed 12 December, 2013)
  38. Knight, W. Andy (2009) ‘Global Governance as a Summative Phenomenon’, in Jim Whitman, ed., Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, 160–87, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Koehn, Daryl and Joe Ueng (2005) ‘Evaluating the Evaluators: Should Investors Trust Corporate Governance Metrics Ratings?’, Journal of Management and Governance 9(2): 111–28.Google Scholar
  40. Krasner, Stephen D. (1982) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, International Organization 36(2): 185–205.Google Scholar
  41. Kratochwil, F. and John G. Ruggie (1986) ‘International-Organization – a State-of-the-Art on an Art of the State’, International Organization 40(4): 753–75.Google Scholar
  42. Lang, Anthony Jr., Nicholas Rengger and William Walker (2006) ‘The Role(s) of Rules: Some Conceptual Clarifications’, International Relations 20(3): 274–94.Google Scholar
  43. Legro, Jeffrey W. (1997) ‘Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the “Failure” of Internationalism’, International Organization 51(1): 31–63.Google Scholar
  44. Milner, Helen (1992) ‘International Theories of Cooperation among Nations’, World Politics 44(3): 466–96.Google Scholar
  45. Mühle, Ursula (2010) The Politics of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Rise of a Global Norm, Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Newmont Mining Corporation (2013) Beyond the Mine: The Journey Towards Sustainability, available at http://www.beyondthemine.com/2012/community_relationships/human_rights (accessed 12 December, 2013).
  47. Oshionebo, Evaristus (2007) ‘The U.N. Global Compact and the Accountability of Transnational Corporations: Separating Myth from Realities’, Florida Journal of International Law 19(1): 1–38.Google Scholar
  48. Post, James E. (2013) ‘The United Nations Global Compact: A CSR Milestone’, Business and Society 52(1): 53–63.Google Scholar
  49. Price, Richard and Christian Reus‐Smit (1998) ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259–94.Google Scholar
  50. Rasche, Andreas, Sandra Waddock and Malcolm Macintosh (2012) ‘The United Nations Global Compact: Retrospect and Prospect’, Business and Society 52(1): 6–30.Google Scholar
  51. Reith, Lothar, Melanie Zimmer, Ralph Hamann and Jon Hanks (2007) ‘The UN Global Compact in Sub-Saharan Africa: Decentralisation and Effectiveness’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 28: 99–112.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenau, James N. (2009) ‘Introduction: Global Governance or Global Governances?’, in Jim Whitman, ed., Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, 1–6, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ruggie, John G. (2007) ‘Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda’, American Journal of International Law 101(4): 819–40.Google Scholar
  55. Ruggie, John G. (2004a) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 499–531.Google Scholar
  56. Ruggie, John G. (2004b) ‘The Global Compact: An Extraordinary Journey’, Greenleaf Publishing, available at http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/bar/rtbrugg.pdf (accessed 25 July, 2012).
  57. Ruggie, John G. (2002a) ‘The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 5: 27–36.Google Scholar
  58. Ruggie, John G. (2002b) ‘The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact’, Greenleaf Publishing, available at http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com/content/pdfs/jcc05rugg.pdf (accessed 25 July, 2012).
  59. Ruggie, John G. (1998) ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization 52(4): 855–85.Google Scholar
  60. Ruggie, John G. (1982) ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change-Embedded Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order’, International Organization 36(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
  61. Sadler, David and Stuart Lloyd (2009) ‘Neo-liberalising Corporate Social Responsibility: A Political Economy of Corporate Citizenship’, Geoforum 40(4): 613–22.Google Scholar
  62. Scalet, Steven and Thomas F. Kelly (2010) ‘CSR Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact?’, Journal of Business Ethics 94: 69–88.Google Scholar
  63. Scherer, Andreas Georg, Guido Palazzo and Dorothée Baumann (2006) ‘Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(4): 505–32.Google Scholar
  64. Scholte, Jan Aart (2011) ‘Towards Greater Legitimacy in Global Governance’, Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 110–20.Google Scholar
  65. Sethi, S. Prakash and Donald H. Schepers (2014) ‘United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap’, Journal of Business Ethics 122: 193–208.Google Scholar
  66. Shanahan, Suzanne and Sanjeev Khagram (2006) ‘Dynamics of Corporate Responsibility’, in Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer and Hokyu Hwang, eds, Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, 196–224, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sikkink, Kathryn (1986) ‘Codes of conduct for transnational corporations: The case of the WHO/UNICEF code’, International Organization 40(4): 815–40.Google Scholar
  68. Soederberg, Susanne (2007) ‘Taming Corporations or Buttressing Market-Led Development? A Critical Assessment of the Global Compact’, Globalizations 4(4): 500–13.Google Scholar
  69. Thérien, Jean-Philippe and Vincent Pouliot (2006) ‘The Global Compact: Shifting the Politics of International Development’, Global Governance 12: 55–75.Google Scholar
  70. United Nations (2013) UN Global Compact, Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2013, available at http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/about_the_gc/Global_Corporate_Sustainability_Report2013.pdf (accessed 11 December, 2013).
  71. United Nations (2007) UN Global Compact Annual Review, 2007 Leaders Summit. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/GCAnnualReview2007.pdf (accessed 5 October, 2010).
  72. Van Kersbergen, Kees and Bertjan Verbeek (2007) ‘The Politics of International Norms: Subsidiarity and the Imperfect Competence Regime of the European Union’, European Journal of International Relations 13(2): 217–38.Google Scholar
  73. Voegtlin, Christian and Nicola M. Pless (2014) ‘Global Governance: CSR and the Role of the UN Global Compact’, Journal of Business Ethics 122(2): 179–91.Google Scholar
  74. Whitehouse, Lisa (2003) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship, and the Global Compact: A New Approach to Regulating Corporate Social Power?’, Global Social Policy 3: 299–318.Google Scholar
  75. Whitman, Jim (2009) ‘Conclusion: The Global Governance Prospect’, in Jim Whitman, ed., Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, 189–203, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Wiener, Antje (2007) ‘The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance Beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to “Interaction”’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
  77. Wiener, Antje and Uwe Puetter (2009) ‘The Quality of Norms is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms’, Journal of International Law and International Relations 5(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  78. World Bank (2002) Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Young, Oran R. (1986) ‘International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions’, World Politics 39(1): 104–22.Google Scholar
  80. Young, Oran R. (1982) ‘Regime Dynamics: The Rise And Fall of International Regimes’, International Organization 36(2): 277–97.Google Scholar
  81. Zwingel, Susanne (2012) ‘How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective1’, International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 115–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political StudiesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations