Advertisement

The sacred, the secular, and the profane: introducing Agamben’s ‘profane philosophy’ to security studies and the case of Israel’s natural gas discoveries

  • Alexei TsinovoiEmail author
Article
  • 564 Downloads

Abstract

In security studies, the dichotomy between ‘security’ and ‘regular’ politics has been effectively challenged in recent years, both theoretically and empirically. To address this challenge, the article develops Giorgio Agamben’s concepts of the sacred, the profane and the secular into three ideal types of power relations, which can provide a basis for critical re-formulation of the concepts of securitisation and desecuritisation. The article illustrates the analytical purchase of these ideal types through an analysis of the politics of Israel’s natural gas discoveries. Due to neoliberal reforms, Israel’s national security has been treated increasingly through the ‘regular’ rules of the market, while the market has been elevated beyond the ‘regular’ rules of politics. The article analyses how formerly separated domains merge, raising questions about what ‘regular’ politics is today, how it is different from security, and how their exclusionary practices can be contested effectively. The article demonstrates how Agamben’s concepts improve our understanding of contemporary configurations of security and politics, highlighting that what is at stake today in security analysis is not only the shifting of issues from security to ‘regular’ politics, but the recovery of their Political essence by means of profanation.

Keywords

Agamben desecuritisation Israel profanation secularisation securitisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the following for their detailed feedback and support: the three anonymous reviewers, the editors of JIRD, Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Line Bahner, Simone Molin Friis, Lene Hansen, Bertel Teilfeldt Hansen, Johan Spanner, Jeppe Strandsbjerg, and Michael C. Williams. This article was carried out with the support of the project ‘Images and International Security’ funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research—Social Sciences, Grant number DFF–1327-00056B.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, Rita and Michael C. Williams (2010) Security Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abulof, Uriel (2014) ‘Deep Securitization and Israel’s “Demographic Demon”’, International Political Sociology 8: 396–415.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, Giorgio (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio (2000) Means without End: Notes on Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Agamben, Giorgio (2005) State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Agamben, Giorgio (2008) The Signature of All Things: On Method, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Agamben, Giorgio (2009) What is an Apparatus? and Other Essays, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Agamben, Giorgio (2010) Profanations, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  9. Aradau, Claudia (2004) ‘Security and the democratic scene: desecuritization and emancipation’, Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.Google Scholar
  10. Aradau, Claudia (2007) ‘Law Transformed: Guantanamo and the ‘other’ exception’, Third World Quarterly 28(3): 489–501.Google Scholar
  11. Aradau, Claudia and Rens van Munster (2007) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 89–115.Google Scholar
  12. Aradau, Claudia (2008) ‘Forget Equality? Security and Liberty in the “War on Terror”’, Alternatives 33: 293–314.Google Scholar
  13. Aradau, Claudia, Luis Lobo-Guerrero and Rens van Munster (2008) ‘Security, Technologies of Risk, and the Political: Guest Editors’ Introduction’, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 147–54.Google Scholar
  14. Åtland, Kristian (2008) ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk Initiative, and the Desecuritization of Interstate Relations in the Arctic’, Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association 43(3): 289–311.Google Scholar
  15. Bahgat, Gawdat (2005) ‘Energy partnership: Israel and the Persian Gulf’, Energy Policy 33: 671–77.Google Scholar
  16. Bahgat, Gawdat (2011) ‘Israel’s Energy Security: Regional Implications’, Middle East Policy 18(3): 25–34.Google Scholar
  17. Balzacq, Thierry (2011) ‘A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants’, in Thierry Balzacq, ed., Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, 1–30, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Balzacq, Thierry, Sara Depauw and Sarah Lèonard (2015) ‘The political limits of desecurutization’, in Thierry Balzacq, ed., Contesting Security: Strategies and Logics, 104–21, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Basuk, Moti and Avi Bar-Eli (2013) ‘The government has approved gas export: 18 ministers supported; Peretz, Arden and German objected’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 23 June, available at http://www.themarker.com/dynamo/1.2052870 (last accessed on 2 February, 2014).
  20. Baum, Ido (2013) ‘The Knesset and the government are on a collision course in light of the gas export debate’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 29 July, available at http://www.themarker.com/law/1.2083292 (last accessed on 5 February, 2014).
  21. Bauman, Zygmunt, Didier Bigo, Paulo Esteves, Elspeth Guild, Vivienne Jabri, David Lyon and R. B. J. Walker (2014) ‘After Snowden: Rethinking the Impact of Surveillance’, International Political Sociology 8: 121–44.Google Scholar
  22. Beck, Ulrich (2011) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Behnke, Andreas (2006) ‘No Way Out: Desecuritization, Emancipation and the Eternal Return of the Political—A Reply to Aradau’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9(1): 62–69.Google Scholar
  24. Benjamin, Walter (1999) ‘Capitalism as Religion’, in Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, eds, Walter BenjaminSelected Writings Volume 1 19131926, 288–91, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  25. Bialer, Uri (1999) Oil and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 194863, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Bialer, Uri (2002) ‘Top Hat, Tuxedo and Cannons: Israeli Foreign Policy from 1948 to 1956 as a Field of Study’, Israel Studies 7(1): 1–80.Google Scholar
  27. Bialer, Uri (2007) ‘Fuel Bridge across the Middle East- Israel, Iran, and the Eilat-Ashkelon Oil Pipeline’, Israel Studies 12(3): 29–67.Google Scholar
  28. Bigo, Didier (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27: 63–92.Google Scholar
  29. Bigo, Didier (2006) ‘Internal and External Aspects of Security’, European Security 15(4): 385–404.Google Scholar
  30. Boyte, Harry C. (2005) ‘Reframing Democracy: Governance, Civic Agency, and Politics’, Public Administration Review 65(5): 536–46.Google Scholar
  31. Buchan, David (2002) ‘The Threat Within: Deregulation and Energy Security’, Survival 44(3): 105–16.Google Scholar
  32. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  33. Ciută, Felix (2010) ‘Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security?’, Security Dialogue 41(2): 123–44.Google Scholar
  34. Cohn, Margit (2002) ‘Fuzzy Legality and National Styles of Regulation: Government Intervention in the Israel Downstream Oil Market’, Law & Policy 24(1): 51–88.Google Scholar
  35. De la Durantaye, Leland (2008) ‘“Homo profanus”: Giorgio Agamben’s profane philosophy’, Boundary 2 35(3): 27–62.Google Scholar
  36. Dean, Mitchel (2007) Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Dean, Mitchel (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edition, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  38. Dillon, Michael (2008) ‘Underwriting Security’, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 309–32.Google Scholar
  39. Edkins, Jenny (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In, London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  40. Elbe, Stefan (2006) ‘Should HIV/AIDS Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security’, International Security Quarterly 50(1): 119–44.Google Scholar
  41. Feiler, Gil (2013) ‘The Economic Implications of the Arab Spring’, in Efraim Inbar, ed., The Arab Spring, Democracy and Security: Domestic and International Ramifications, 108–27, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Floyd, Rita (2007) ‘Towards a Consequentialist Evaluation of Security: Bringing Together the Copenhagen and the Welsh Schools of Security Studies’, Review of International Studies 33(2): 327–50.Google Scholar
  43. Floyd, Rita (2011) ‘Can Securitization Theory be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards a Just Securitization Theory’, Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 427–39.Google Scholar
  44. Foucault, Michel (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’, in Colin Gordon, ed., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 19721977, 194–228, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  45. Foucault, Michel (1988) ‘The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom—An Interview Translated by J. D. Gautier S. J.’, in James W. Bernauer and David M. Rasmussen, eds, The Final Foucault, 1–20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Foucault, Michel (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  47. Foucault, Michel (2002) ‘Governmentality’, in James D. Faubion, ed., Michel Foucault, Power: Essential Works of Foucault 19541984, Volume 3, 201–22, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Foucault, Michel (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 19781979, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Gad, Ulrik Pram and Karen Lund Petersen (2011) ‘Concepts of Politics in Securitization Studies’, Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 315–28.Google Scholar
  50. Ganor, Boaz (2013) ‘The challenge of terrorism’, in Efraim Inbar, ed., The Arab Spring, Democracy and Security: Domestic and International Ramifications, 89–107, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Gordon, Uri (2012) ‘Israel’s “Tent Protests”: The Chilling Effect of Nationalism’, Social Movement Studies 11(3–4): 349–55.Google Scholar
  52. Gutman, Lior (2013) ‘Peretz: “The amount of gas in Leviathan is not certain, we are not a super power”’ [in Hebrew], Calcalist, 5 June, available at http://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3604329,00.html (last accessed on 6 December, 2013).
  53. Hansen, Lene (2012) ‘Reconstructing Desecuritisation: The Normative-Political in the Copenhagen School and Directions for How to Apply It’, Review of international Studies 38(3): 525–46.Google Scholar
  54. Huysmans, Jef (1998) ‘The Question of the Limit: Desecuritisation and the Aesthetics of Horror in Political Realism’, Millennium — Journal of International Relations 27: 569–89.Google Scholar
  55. Huysmans, Jef (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Huysmans, Jef (2008) ‘The Jargon of Exception: On Schmitt, Agamben and the Absence of Political Society’, International Political Sociology 2: 165–83.Google Scholar
  57. Huysmans, Jef (2011) ‘What’s in an Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings’, Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 371–83.Google Scholar
  58. Kinnvall, Catarina and Paul Nesbitt-Larking (2013) ‘Securitising Citizenship: (B)ordering Practices and Strategies of Resistance’, Global Society 27(3): 337–59.Google Scholar
  59. Lobo-Guerrero, Louis (2014) ‘Life Securitisation, the Event Object of Insurance and the Strategisation of Time’, Journal of Cultural Economy 7(3): 353–70.Google Scholar
  60. Lupovici, Amir (2014a) ‘The Limits of Securitization Theory: Observational Criticism and the Curious Absence of Israel’, International Studies Review 16: 390–410.Google Scholar
  61. Lupovici, Amir (2014b) ‘Securitization Climax: Putting the Iranian Nuclear Project at the Top of the Israeli Public Agenda (2009–2012)’, Foreign Policy Analysis 1–20.Google Scholar
  62. Mouffe, Chantal (2009a) The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  63. Mouffe, Chantal (2009b) On the Political, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Owens, Patricia (2009) Between War and Politics: International Relations and the Thought of Hannah Arendt, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Peri, Yoram (1993) ‘The Arab-Israeli Conflict and Israeli Democracy’, in Ehud Sprinzak and Larry Diamond, eds, Israeli Democracy Under Stress, 343–57, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  66. Petersen, Karen Lund (2012) ‘Risk Analysis: A Field Within Security Studies?’, European Journal of International Relations 18(4): 693–717.Google Scholar
  67. Prozorov, Sergei (2011) ‘Pornography and Profanation in the Political Philosophy of Giorgio Agamben’, Theory Culture Society 28(4): 71–95.Google Scholar
  68. Raz, Hila (2013a) ‘Gronis in the debate on gas export petitions: What prevents the Knesset to pass legislation on the quantity of gas for exports?’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 20 October, available at http://www.themarker.com/law/1.2144566 (last accessed on 1 February, 2014).
  69. Raz, Hila (2013b) ‘Victory for the government: Supreme Court Judges have rejected the petition against gas export’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 21 October, available at http://www.themarker.com/law/1.2145826 (last accessed on 8 February, 2014).
  70. Rancière, Jacques (2004) The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  71. Roe, Paul (2012) ‘Is Securitization a Negative Concept? Revisiting the Normative Debate Over Normal Versus Extraordinary Politics’, Security Dialogue 43(3): 249–66.Google Scholar
  72. Rosenhek, Zeev and Michael Shalev (2014) ‘The Political Economy of Israel’s “Social Justice” Protests: A Class and Generational Analysis’, Contemporary Social Science 9(1): 31–48.Google Scholar
  73. Schmitt, Carl (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Seabrooke, Leonard (2011) ‘Economists and Diplomacy: Professions and the Practice of Economic Policy’, International Journal 66(3): 629–42.Google Scholar
  75. Sela, Avraham (2005) ‘Politics, Identity and Peacemaking: The Arab Discourse on Peace with Israel in the 1990s’, Israel Studies 10(2): 15–71.Google Scholar
  76. Seliktar, Ofira (2009) ‘The Israeli Economy’, in Robert O. Freedman, ed., Contemporary Israel: Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Security Challenges, 159–72, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  77. Shaffer, Brenda (2009) Energy Politics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  78. Shaffer, Brenda (2011) ‘Israel—New Natural Gas Producer in the Mediterranean’, Energy Policy 39: 5379–87.Google Scholar
  79. Sharkansky, Ira (1993) ‘Israel’s Political Economy’, in Ehud Sprinzak and Larry Diamond, eds, Israeli Democracy Under Stress, 153–70, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  80. Spoelstra, Sverre (2007) What is Organization?, Lund: Lund Business Press.Google Scholar
  81. Taureck, Rita (2006) ‘Securitization Theory and Securitization Studies’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9(1): 53–61.Google Scholar
  82. Teschner, Na’ama, Adrian McDonald, Timothy J. Foxon and Jouni Paavola (2012) ‘Integrated Transitions Toward Stainability: The Case of Water and Energy Policies in Israel’, Technological Forecasting& Social Change 79: 457–68.Google Scholar
  83. Van Munster, Rens (2009) Securitizing Immigration: The Politics of Risk in the EU, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  84. Williams, Michael C. (2003) ‘Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics’, International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–31.Google Scholar
  85. Wæver, Ole (1995) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in Ronnie D. Lipschutz, ed., On Security, 46–86, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wæver, Ole (2009) ‘What Exactly Makes a Continuous Existential Threat Existential—And How Is It Discontinued?’, in Oren Barak and Gabriel Sheffer, eds, Existential Threats and Civil-Security Relations, 19–35, New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  87. Zarchia, Tzvi (2013a) ‘Braverman: “We have petitioned against the decision of the government on gas export”’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 24 June, available at http://www.themarker.com/news/politics/1.2054040 (last accessed on 4 February, 2014).
  88. Zarchia, Tzvi (2013b) ‘Yachimovich to the legal advisor to the government: “Stop the decision for mass scale gas export”’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 20 June, available at http://www.themarker.com/news/politics/1.2051433 (last accessed on 5 February, 2014).
  89. Zarchia, Tzvi (2013c) ‘Braverman to Netanyahu: “The decision on gas export should be taken by the Knesset”’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 22 June, available at http://www.themarker.com/dynamo/1.2052535 (last accessed on 5 February, 2014).
  90. Zarchia, Tzvi (2013d) ‘There is doubt whether the government can decide on gas exports without the Knesset’ [in Hebrew], Marker, 28 July, available at http://www.themarker.com/news/1.2082911 (last accessed on 4 February, 2014).
  91. Žižek, Slavoj (2008) For They Know Not What They Do, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations