Advertisement

Uncertainty avoidance moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and innovation: A meta-analysis

  • Logan L WattsEmail author
  • Logan M Steele
  • Deanne N Den Hartog
Research Note

Abstract

Transformational leadership is commonly assumed to facilitate employee innovation in all cultures. Drawing upon field studies from 17 countries, this meta-analysis revealed that supervisor transformational leadership is positively related to individual- and team-level innovation regardless of national boundaries. However, the relationship trended somewhat more strongly in countries with higher levels of uncertainty avoidance. These findings suggest that employee innovation in most countries can be enhanced by investing in supervisor transformational leadership, but organizations operating in countries with higher levels of uncertainty avoidance may benefit more from this strategy.

Keywords

transformational leadership innovation creativity uncertainty avoidance meta-analysis 

Résumé

Dans toutes les cultures, on suppose généralement que le leadership transformationnel facilite l’innovation des employés. S’appuyant sur des études de terrain menées dans 17 pays, cette méta-analyse a révélé que le leadership transformationnel des superviseurs est positivement lié à l’innovation au niveau des individus et des équipes, quelles que soient les frontières nationales. Toutefois, le lien est légèrement renforcé dans les pays où les niveaux de contrôle de l’incertitude sont plus élevés. Ces résultats suggèrent que, dans la plupart des pays, il est possible d’améliorer l’innovation des employés en investissant dans le leadership transformationnel des superviseurs, mais que les organisations opérant dans des pays caractérisés par un plus fort contrôle de l’incertitude pourraient tirer davantage parti de cette stratégie.

Resumen

El liderazgo transformación es asumido comúnmente para facilitar la innovación de los empleados en todas las culturas. A partir de estudios de campo en 17 países, este meta-análisis reveló que el liderazgo transformacional del supervisor se relaciona positivamente con la innovación a nivel individual y de equipo, independientemente de las fronteras nacionales. Sin embargo, la relación tendió a ser algo más fuerte en países con niveles más altos de evitación de la incertidumbre. Estos hallazgos sugieren que la innovación de los empleados en la mayoría de los países puede ser aumentada invirtiendo en el liderazgo transformacional del supervisor, pero las organizaciones que operan en países con mayores niveles de evitación de la incertidumbre pueden beneficiarse más de esta estrategia.

Resumo

Liderança transformacional é comumente admitida como facilitadora para a inovação de funcionários em todas as culturas. Baseando-se em estudos de campo de 17 países, esta meta-análise revelou que a liderança transformacional do supervisor está positivamente relacionada à inovação em nível individual e de equipe, independentemente das fronteiras nacionais. No entanto, o relacionamento tendeu a ser um pouco mais forte em países com níveis mais altos de evitação de incerteza. Essas descobertas sugerem que a inovação de funcionários na maioria dos países pode ser aprimorada com o investimento em liderança transformacional do supervisor, mas organizações que operam em países com mais altos níveis de evitação de incerteza podem se beneficiar mais dessa estratégia.

摘要

变革型领导力被通常认为能够促进所有文化中的员工创新。根据来自17个国家的实地研究, 这项元分析显示, 主管的变革型领导力与个人和团队层面的创新都正相关,而与国界无关。然而, 在不确定性规避等级较高的国家这种关系趋强。这些研究结果表明, 大多数国家的员工创新可以通过投资主管的变革型领导力来加强, 但在不确定性规避等级较高的国家运营的组织可能会从这一策略中更多地受益。

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kelsey Medeiros, Tyler Mulhearn, and Tristan McIntosh who contributed as coders, Michael Mumford who inspired the initial literature review, and the many scholars who responded to our calls for primary data. We also thank our Editor, Dr. Mark Peterson, and three anonymous reviewers, whose thoughtful recommendations significantly improved the quality of this manuscript. An earlier version of this work was presented at the 33rd annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.

Supplementary material

41267_2019_242_MOESM1_ESM.doc (770 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 769 kb)

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Sturman, M. C., & Pierce, C. A. 2008. Comparison of three meta-analytic procedures for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1): 9–34.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1): 123–167.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5): 1297–1333.Google Scholar
  4. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. 1995. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2): 199–218.Google Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. 1997. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2): 130–139.Google Scholar
  6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. 2006. Transformational leadership. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beugelsdijk, S., Ambos, B., & Nell, P. C. 2018. Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: Recurring questions and best practice guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1113–1137.Google Scholar
  8. Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., & Hoorn, A. 2015. Are scores on Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture stable over time? A cohort analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 5(3): 223–240.Google Scholar
  9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. 2011. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. De Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. 2002. Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2): 121–137.Google Scholar
  11. Den Hartog, D. N., et al. 1999. Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 219–256.Google Scholar
  12. Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. 2003. Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 729–768.Google Scholar
  13. Elenkov, D. S., & Manev, I. M. 2005. Top management leadership and influence on innovation: The role of sociocultural context. Journal of Management, 31(3): 381–402.Google Scholar
  14. Engelen, A., Schmidt, S., Strenger, L., & Brettel, M. 2014. Top management's transformational leader behaviors and innovation orientation: A cross-cultural perspective in eight countries. Journal of International Management, 20: 124–136.Google Scholar
  15. Ergeneli, A., Gohar, R., & Temirbekova, Z. 2007. Transformational leadership: Its relationship to culture value dimensions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(6): 703–724.Google Scholar
  16. Fahr, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Cheng, B. S. 1987. Culture-free leadership effectiveness versus moderators of leadership behaviors: An extension and test of Kerr and Jermier’s ‘substitutes for leadership’ model in Taiwan. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3): 43–60.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, R., et al. 2019. Does organizational formalization facilitate voice and helping organizational citizenship behaviors? It depends on (national) uncertainty norms. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1): 125–134.Google Scholar
  18. Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. 2009. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 765–778.Google Scholar
  19. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. 2011. Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1): 90–105.Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousdand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., & Helleur, J. 2000. Enhancing transformational leadership: The roles of training and feedback. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(3): 145–149.Google Scholar
  24. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.Google Scholar
  25. Lachman, R., Nedd, A., & Hinings, B. 1994. Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Science, 40(1): 40–55.Google Scholar
  26. Lynn, R., & Martin, T. 1995. National differences for thirty-seven nations in extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and economic, demographic and other correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3): 403–406.Google Scholar
  27. Medeiros, K. E., Watts, L. L., & Mumford, M. D. 2017. Thinking inside the box: Educating leaders to manage constraints. In C. Zhou (Ed.): Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 25–50). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  28. Minkov, M. 2017. A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3): 386–404.Google Scholar
  29. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1): 27–43.Google Scholar
  30. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. 2002. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6): 705–750.Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, M. F., & Barreto, T. S. 2014. The like it or not proposition: Implications of societal characteristics for the cultural expertise and personal values of organization members. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(8): 1134–1152.Google Scholar
  32. Peterson, M. F., & Barreto, T. S. 2018. Interpreting societal culture value dimensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1190–1207.Google Scholar
  33. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 2013. Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9): 867–897.Google Scholar
  34. Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. 2008. Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2): 145–158.Google Scholar
  35. Shane, S. 1993. Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1): 59–73.Google Scholar
  36. Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. 1995. Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies. Journal of Management, 21(5): 931–952.Google Scholar
  37. Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. 2002. The origins of vision: Charismatic versus ideological leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4): 343–377.Google Scholar
  38. Tung, R. L., & Stahl, G. K. 2018. The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1167–1189.Google Scholar
  39. Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W. L. 2010. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2): 112–125.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, G., Oh, I. S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. 2011. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group and Organization Management, 36(2): 223–270.Google Scholar
  41. Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Todd, E. M., & Mumford, M. D. 2017. Leader idea evaluation and follower creativity: Challenges, constraints, and capabilities. In M. D. Mumford & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 82–99). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Logan L Watts
    • 1
    Email author
  • Logan M Steele
    • 2
  • Deanne N Den Hartog
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Baruch College and The Graduate CenterCUNYNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Muma College of BusinessUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.The University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations