Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 1131–1150 | Cite as

MNE internationalization patterns, the roles of knowledge stocks, and the portfolio of MNE subsidiaries

  • Thomas HutzschenreuterEmail author
  • Tanja Matt
Counterpoint

Abstract

Learning and knowledge are crucial to the internationalization process of the firm. Johanson and Vahlne (1977, 2009) put gaining experience, i.e., learning and accumulating knowledge at the heart of their internationalization model. We posit that the IB field has perhaps moved too fast from conceptual work to quantitative empirical studies, not devoting sufficient attention to the idea of experiential learning, either conceptually or empirically. We look at the most cited internationalization studies to assess their theoretical and empirical contributions to experiential learning and knowledge stock accumulation and to the important role played by the portfolio of MNE subsidiaries as a knowledge source. We extend theory by carefully laying out how a growing portfolio of subsidiaries leads to accumulation of particular kinds of knowledge stocks, which can help with subsequent expansion moves. We show also how the concept of added distance supports this argumentation, thereby contributing to the theoretical and empirical work on the “further internationalizing” MNE.

Keywords

internationalization experiential learning knowledge stock subsidiary portfolio MNE theory added distance 

Résumé

L’apprentissage et les connaissances sont cruciaux pour le processus d’internationalisation de la firme. Johanson et Vahlne (1977, 2009) mettent l’acquisition d’expériences, c’est-à-dire l’apprentissage et l’accumulation de connaissances au cœur de leur modèle d’internationalisation. Nous considérons que le champ de l’IB a peut-être évolué trop vite d’un travail conceptuel aux études empiriques quantitatives, n’accordant pas assez d’attention à l’idée d’apprentissage expérientiel, ni au niveau conceptuel ni au niveau empirique. Nous analysons les études les plus citées sur l’internationalisation pour évaluer leurs contributions théoriques et empiriques concernant l’apprentissage expérientiel et l’accumulation d’un stock de connaissances, et le rôle important joué par le portefeuille de filiales d’une FMN comme source de connaissances. Nous élargissons la théorie en montrant de manière détaillée comment un portefeuille croissant de filiales conduit à l’accumulation de certains types de stocks de connaissances qui peuvent aider les mouvements d’expansion ultérieurs. Nous montrons aussi comment le concept de distance ajoutée étaye cette argumentation, contribuant ainsi au travail théorique et empirique sur la FMN “poursuivant son internationalisation”.

Resumen

El aprendizaje y el conocimiento son cruciales en el proceso de internacionalización de una empresa. Johanson y Vahlne (1977, 2009) pusieron la experiencia adquirida, es decir, el aprendizaje y el conocimiento acumulado en el corazón de su modelo de internacionalización. Nosotros postulamos que el campo de los Negocios Internacionales se ha movido quizás muy rápido del trabajo conceptual a los estudios empíricos cuantitativos, no consagrando suficiente atención a la idea de aprendizaje experiencial, ya sea conceptualmente o empíricamente. Examinamos los estudios más citados sobre internacionalización para evaluar sus contribuciones teóricas y empíricas al aprendizaje experiencial y la acumulación de conocimiento existente y al importante papel que juegan los portafolios de las subsidiarias de las empresas multinacionales (EMN) como una fuente de conocimiento. Ampliamos la teoría exponiendo cuidadosamente como un aumento de portafolios de las subsidiarias lleva a la acumulación de tipos particulares de conocimientos acumulados, lo que puede ayudar con los movimientos de expansión subsecuentes. Demostramos también como el concepto de distancia agregada apoya esta argumentación, contribuyendo así al trabajo teórico y empírico sobre “avanzar la internacionalización” de las EMN.

Resumo

Aprendizagem e conhecimento são cruciais para o processo de internacionalização da firma. Johanson e Vahlne (1977, 2009) incluíram adquirir experiência, ou seja, aprender e acumular conhecimento no coração de seu modelo de internacionalização. Propomos que o campo de IB talvez tenha se movido muito rapidamente do trabalho conceitual para estudos empíricos quantitativos, não dedicando suficiente atenção à ideia de aprendizagem experiencial, seja de forma conceitual ou empírica. Analisamos os estudos de internacionalização mais citados para avaliar suas contribuições teóricas e empíricas para a aprendizagem experiencial e acumulação de conhecimento e para o importante papel desempenhado pelo portfólio de subsidiárias da MNE como fonte de conhecimento. Estendemos a teoria especificando cuidadosamente como uma crescente carteira de subsidiárias leva à acumulação de tipos específicos de conhecimento, que podem ajudar com subsequentes movimentos de expansão. Mostramos também como o conceito de distância adicionada apoia essa argumentação, contribuindo assim para o trabalho teórico e empírico sobre a MNE que se internacionaliza ainda mais.

概要

学习和知识对公司的国际化进程至关重要 Johanson和Vahlne(1977年, 2009年)将获得经验, 即学习和积累知识置于他们国际化模型的核心。我们认为, IB领域或许从理论工作到定量实证研究发展得太快,既没有在概念上也没有在实证上对体验式学习的观念给予足够的重视。我们研究被最多引用的国际化研究,评估它们对体验式学习和知识库存积累的理论和实证贡献,以及对跨国公司子公司组合作为知识来源所起的重要作用。我们拓展理论,仔细规划不断增长的子公司组合如何导致特定类型知识库的积累,从而有助于随后的拓展。我们还展示了附加距离的概念如何支持这一论证,从而有助于跨国企业“进一步国际化”的理论和实证工作。

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful for extraordinary valuable comments and suggestions received from as well as outstanding developmental guidance throughout the review process by the JIBS Editor-in-Chief Alain Verbeke, which have significantly improved this article. The authors also thank JIBS Managing Editor Anne Hoekman for excellent service.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Flores, R. G., & Vaaler, P. M. 2007. Is it all a matter of grouping? Examining the regional effect in global strategy research. In S. Tallman (Ed.), International strategic management: A new generation: 209–228. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Alcacér, J., & Chung, W. 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53(5): 760–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambos, T. C., & Ambos, B. 2009. The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multi-national corporations. Journal of International Management, 15(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambos, T. C., Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2006. Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters’ benefits from reverse knowledge transfers. International Business Review, 15(3): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambos, T., & Mahnle, V. 2010. How do MNC HQ add value? Management International Review, 50(4): 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, O. 1993. On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy: business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.Google Scholar
  8. Argote, L. 2005. Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. New York, N.Y.: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. 2011. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5): 1123–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arregle, J.-L., Beamish, P. W., & Hébert, L. 2009. The regional dimension of MNEs' foreign subsidiary localization. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asakawa, K., & Lehrer, M. 2003. Managing local knowledge assets globally: The role of regional innovation relays. Journal of World Business, 38(1): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3): 630–640.Google Scholar
  13. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, 47(2): 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baaij, M. G., & Slangen, A. H. L. 2013. The role of headquarters–subsidiary geographic distance in strategic decisions by spatially disaggregated headquarters. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9): 941–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., & Pennings, J. M. 1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barkema, H. G., & Drogendijk, R. 2007. Internationalising in small, incremental or larger steps? Journal of International Business Studies, 38(7): 1132–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 2002. Managing across borders: The transnational solution (2nd edn). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  21. Baum, J. A., & Dahlin, K. B. 2007. Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science, 18(3): 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Benito, G. R. G., & Gripsrud, G. 1992. The expansion of foreign direct investments: Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process? Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3): 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Betz, G. 2006. Prediction or prophecy? The boundaries of economic foreknowledge and their socio-political consequences. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Bingham, C. B., & Davis, J. P. 2012. Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3): 611–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Birkinshaw, J. 2002. Managing internal R&D networks in global firms. Long Range Planning, 35(3): 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. 1999. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Holmes and Meier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. 2004. Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chang, S. J. 1995. International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. 2004. A strategic approach to internationalization: A traditional versus a “born-global” approach. Journal of International Marketing, 12(1): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Child, J., Ng, S. H., & Wong, C. 2002. Psychic distance and internationalization: Evidence from Hong Kong firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(1): 36–56.Google Scholar
  33. Cho, K. R., & Padmanabhan, P. 2005. Revisiting the role of cultural distance in MNC’s foreign ownership mode choice: The moderating effect of experience attributes. International Business Review, 14(3): 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Clark, T., & Pugh, D. S. 2001. Foreign country priorities in the internationalization process: A measure and an exploratory test on British firms. International Business Review, 10(3): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Crick, D., & Spence, M. 2005. The internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: A study of planned and unplanned strategies. International Business Review, 14(2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2003. Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11): 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dow, D., & Larimo, J. 2011. Disentangling the roles of international experience and distance in establishment mode choice. Management International Review, 51(3): 321–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dunning, J. H. 1981. International production and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. Enright, M. J. 2005. The roles of regional management centers. Management International Review, 45(1): 83–102.Google Scholar
  41. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. 1997. Time and experience in the internationalization process. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 71(1): 21–43.Google Scholar
  42. Eriksson, K., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. D. 2000. Path dependence and knowledge development in the internationalization process. Management International Review, 40(4): 307–328.Google Scholar
  43. Fernandez, Z., & Nieto, M. J. 2005. Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: Some influential factors. Family Business Review, 18(1): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Forsgren, M. 2002. The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3): 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. 2010. A dialogue about the Uppsala model of internationalization. In U. Andersson & U. Holm (Eds), Managing the contemporary multinational – the role of headquarters: 283–304. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  46. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. 2002. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fredrickson, J. W. 1986. The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 11(2): 280–297.Google Scholar
  48. Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. 2000. Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137–147.Google Scholar
  50. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603–625.Google Scholar
  51. Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. 1999. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hashai, N. 2011. Sequencing the expansion of geographic scope and foreign operations by “born global” firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(8): 995–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hennart, J.-F. 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  57. Hernández, V., & Pedersen, T. 2017. Global value chain configuration: A review and research agenda. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  58. Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. 2013. Performance effects of international expansion processes: The moderating role of top management team experiences. International Business Review, 22(1): 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. 2014. Added psychic distance stimuli and MNE performance: Performance effects of added cultural, governance, geographic, and economic distance in MNEs’ international expansion. Journal of International Management, 20(1): 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hutzschenreuter, T., & Voll, J. C. 2008. Performance effects of “added cultural distance” in the path of international expansion: The case of German multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hutzschenreuter, T., Voll, J. C., & Verbeke, A. 2011. The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: A Penrosean perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 305–329.Google Scholar
  63. Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Inkpen, A. C. 1996. Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review, 39(1): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5): 957–970.Google Scholar
  66. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 7(4): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2003. Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The internationalization of the firm – four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Johnson, G. 1988. Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Jones, M. V., & Coviello, N. E. 2005. Internationalisation: Conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1139–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(1): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The S-Curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies., 38(4): 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mahnke, V., & Pedersen, T. 2004. Knowledge flows, governance and the multinational enterprise: Frontiers in international management research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Masen, T. K., & Servais, P. 1997. The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6): 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 235–252.Google Scholar
  88. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 586–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mohr, A., & Batsakis, G. 2017. Internationalization speed and firm performance: A study of the market-seeking expansion of retail MNEs. Management International Review, 57(2): 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Monteiro, L. F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1): 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Moore, K., & Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4): 81–92.Google Scholar
  92. Mudambi, R. 2002. Knowledge management in multinational firms. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Pedersen, T., & Petersen, B. 2004. Learning about foreign markets: Are entrant firms exposed to a “Shock effect”? Journal of International Marketing, 12(1): 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. Petersen, B., Pedersen, T., & Lyles, M. A. 2008. Closing knowledge gaps in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7): 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Powell, K. S. 2014. From M-P to MA-P: Multinationality alignment and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79–93.Google Scholar
  100. Quinn, J. B. 1980. Strategies for change. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  101. Ref, O. 2015. The relationship between product and geographic diversification: A fine-grained analysis of its different patterns. Journal of International Management, 21(2): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 435–454.Google Scholar
  103. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internationalization and strategic management perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2005. Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction cost economics approach. Management International Review, 45(1): 5–17.Google Scholar
  108. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional networks: industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Schu, M., Morschett, D., & Swoboda, B. 2016. Internationalization speed of online retailers: A resource-based perspective on the influence factors. Management International Review, 56(5): 733–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schulz, M. 2001. The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schulz, M. 2003. Pathways of relevance: Exploring inflows of knowledge into subunits of multinational corporations. Organization Science, 14(4): 440–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sharma, D. D., & Blomstermo, A. 2003. A critical review of time in the internationalization process of firms. Journal of Global Marketing, 16(4): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Simonin, B. L. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7): 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Simonin, B. L. 2004. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. 1994. Understanding corporate coherence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. 2017. The internationalization process 1977–2017: The Uppsala Model 40 years later. Journal of International Business Studies. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7.
  118. Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7): 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wagner, H. 2004. Internationalization speed and cost efficiency: Evidence from Germany. International Business Review, 13(4): 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. 2007. Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(3): 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Welch, C., Nummela, N., & Liesch, P. 2016. The internationalization process model revisited: An agenda for future research. Management International Review, 56(6): 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Ucbasaran, D. 2001. The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4): 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zaheer, S., & Manrakhan, S. 2001. Concentration and dispersion in global industries: Remote electronic access and the location of economic activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185–203.Google Scholar
  127. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1): 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations