Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 1045–1064 | Cite as

Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship

  • Peter J Buckley
  • Jonathan P DohEmail author
  • Mirko H Benischke
Perspective

Abstract

In this article, we review critiques of international business (IB) research with a focus on whether IB scholarship tackles “big questions.” We identify three major areas where IB scholars have addressed important global phenomena, but find that they have had little influence outside of IB, and only limited effects on business or government policy. We propose a redirection of IB research towards “grand challenges” in global business and the use of interdisciplinary research methods, multilevel approaches, and phenomena-driven perspectives to address those questions. We argue that IB can play a more constructive and vital role by tackling expansive topics at the business–societal interface.

Keywords

evaluation of current theories international business theory MNEs and economic growth institutional environment 

Résumé

Dans cet article, nous analysons les critiques sur la recherche en international business (IB), en nous demandant plus précisément si les études en IB traitent les "grandes questions". Nous identifions trois domaines majeurs où les chercheurs en IB ont traité des phénomènes globaux importants, mais nous constatons qu'ils ont eu peu d'influence en dehors de l'IB et seulement des effets limités sur la politique des entreprises ou des gouvernements. Nous proposons une réorientation de la recherche en IB vers les "grands défis" de la gestion globale et l'utilisation de méthodes de recherche interdisciplinaires, d'approches multi-niveaux et de perspectives basées sur des phénomènes pour traiter ces questions. Nous avançons que l'IB peut jouer un rôle plus constructif et vital en abordant des thèmes étendus à l'interface de la gestion et de la société.

Resumen

En este artículo, revisamos las críticas a la investigación en negocios internacionales con un enfoque en sí los estudiosos de negocios internacionales abordan las “grandes preguntas.” Identificamos tres áreas principales en donde los académicos de negocios internacionales han abordado importantes fenómenos globales, pero encontramos que han tenido poca influencia fuera de negocios internacionales, y efectos limitados solamente a la política empresarial o gubernamental. Proponemos un re-direccionamiento de la investigación de negocios internacionales hacia los “grandes retos” en negocios globales y el uso de métodos de investigación interdisciplinarios, enfoques multinivel y perspectivas orientadas a los fenómenos para abordar estas preguntas. Sostenemos que negocios internacionales puede jugar un rol más constructivo y vital al abordar temas más amplios en la interfaz negocio-sociedad.

Resumo

Neste artigo, revemos as críticas à pesquisa sobre negócios internacionais (IB) que focam em saber se acadêmicos de IB abordam “grandes questões”. Identificamos três áreas principais em que acadêmicos de IB abordaram fenômenos globais importantes, mas descobrimos que tiveram pouca influência fora de IB e apenas limitados efeitos em políticas empresariais ou governamentais. Propomos um redirecionamento da pesquisa de IB para “grandes desafios” em negócios globais e o uso de métodos interdisciplinares de pesquisa, abordagens multinível e perspectivas orientadas a fenômenos para abordar essas questões. Argumentamos que o IB pode desempenhar um papel mais construtivo e vital abordando tópicos expansivos na interface empresa-sociedade.

摘要

在这篇文章中, 我们回顾了对国际商务(IB)研究的批评, 重点看IB学术界是否在解决“大问题”。我们确定了IB学者研究重大全球现象的三个主要领域, 但发现它们在IB以外影响力不大, 对商业或政府政策的影响有限。我们提出将IB研究重新转向到全球商业中的“大挑战”, 以及使用跨学科研究方法, 多层次方法和现象驱动的视角来解决这些问题。我们认为, IB可以通过在商业-社会界面研讨广泛的话题, 发挥更有建设性和至关重要的作用。

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jeremy Clegg and Heinz Tuselmann, JIBS Editor-in-Chief Alain Verbeke, and two anonymous reviewers for comments and feedback on earlier versions of this article. We also thank Fleur Peltenburg for research assistance. Any errors remain our own.

References

  1. Agtmael, A. 2007. The emerging markets century: How a new breed of world-class companies is overtaking the world. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., Flores, R. G., & Vaaler, P. 2007. Is it all a matter of grouping? Examining the regional effect in global strategy research. In S. Tallman (Ed), International strategic management: A new generation: 161–190. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Aguilera, R. V., Ciravegna, L., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. 2017. Multilatinas and the internationalization of Latin American firms. Journal of World Business, 52(4): 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, U., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Nielsen, B. B. 2014. From the editors: Explaining interaction effects within and across levels of analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9): 1063–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ang, S. H., Benischke, M. H., & Doh, J. P. 2015. The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1536–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. 2012. Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4): 813–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. 2011. Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3–4): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 2016. Grand global challenges: About challenges. http://gcgh.grandchallenges.org/about. Accessed 17 June 2016.
  11. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. 1992. Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Bu, M., & Wagner, M. 2016. Racing to the bottom and racing to the top: The crucial role of firm characteristics in foreign direct investment choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(9): 1032–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley, P. J. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckley, P. J. 2010. Twenty years of the World Investment Report: Retrospect and prospects. Transnational Corporations, 19(2): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley, P. J. 2016. The contribution of internalisation theory to international business: New realities and unanswered questions. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buckley, P. J., & Lessard, D. R. 2005. Regaining the edge for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buckley, P. J., & Verbeke, A. 2016. Smiling and crying curves in international business. International Business Review, 3(25): 749–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A., Voss, H., Xin, L., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bunyaratavej, K., Doh, J. P., Hahn, E. D., Lewin, A., & Massini, S. 2011. Conceptual issues in services offshoring research: A multi-disciplinary review. Group and Organization Management, 36(1): 70–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cantwell, J., Piepenbrink, A., & Shukla, P. 2014. Assessing the impact of JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal: A network approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7): 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chattopadhyay, A., & Batra, R. 2012. The new emerging market multinationals: Four strategies for disrupting markets and building brands. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Cheng, J. L. C., Henisz, W. J., Roth, K., & Swaminathan, A. 2009. Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: Prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1070–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. 2007. Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collinson, S., Buckley, P. J., Dunning, J. H., & Yip, G. 2006. New directions in international business. In F. M. Fai & E. J. Morgan (Eds), Managerial issues in international business. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. 2007. Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2008. The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management, 14(2): 138–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Narula, R., & Un, C. A. 2015. Internationalization motives: Sell more, buy better, upgrade and escape. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Darendeli, I. S., & Hill, T. L. 2015. Uncovering the complex relationships between political risk and MNE firm legitimacy: Insights from Libya. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1): 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dean, T. J., & McMullan, J. S. 2007. Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 50–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. 1999. Social movements: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Doh, J. P. 2005. Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3): 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Doh, J. P. 2015. Why we need phenomenon-based research in international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 609–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Doh, J. P., Bunyaratavej, K., & Hahn, E. D. 2009. Separable but not equal: The location determinants of discrete offshoring activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6): 926–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dunning, J. H. 1958. American investment in British manufacturing industry. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  38. Dunning, J. H. 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dunning, J. H. 1989. The study of international business: A plea for a more interdisciplinary approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3): 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., & Park, D. 2008. Old wine in new bottles: A comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed country TNCs thirty years ago. In K. P. Sauvant (Ed), The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity: 158–182. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Eden, L., & Lenway, S. 2001. Multinationals: The Janus face of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Funk, C. A., Arthurs, J. D., Trevino, L. J., & Joireman, J. 2010. Consumer animosity in the global value chain: The effect of international production shifts on willingness to purchase hybrid products. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 639–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. 2014. Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1): 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gereffi, G. 1999. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1): 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghemawat, P. 2007. Why the world isn’t flat. Foreign Policy, 159: 54–60.Google Scholar
  46. Gooris, J., & Peeters, C. 2016. Fragmenting global business processes: A protection for proprietary information. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5): 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grand Challenges Canada. 2011. Grand challenges Canada: The grand challenges approach. http://www.grandchallenges.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/thegrandchallengesapproach.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2016.
  48. Griffith, D. A., & Myers, M. B. 2005. The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. 2010. Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guillen, M. F., & Garcia-Canal, E. 2009. The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Henisz, W. J. 2011. Leveraging the financial crisis to fulfill the promise of progressive management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(2): 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12): 1727–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hymer, S. A. 1960. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kano, L. 2017. Global value chain governance: A relational perspective. Journal of International Business Studies. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0086-8.Google Scholar
  55. Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Murtha, T. P. 2009. Offshoring administrative and technical work: New fields for understanding the global enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6): 887–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kenworthy, T. P., & Verbeke, A. 2015. The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing. European Management Journal, 33(3): 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S. H. 2015. Why strategic factor markets matter: “New” multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 518–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kolk, A. 2016. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. 2012. Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lambell, R., Ramia, G., Nyland, C., & Michelotti, M. 2008. NGOs and international business research: Progress, prospects and problems. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laplume, A. O., Petersen, B., & Pearce, J. M. 2016. Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5): 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. 2003. A Neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liesch, P. S., Buckley, P. J., Simonin, B. L., & Knight, G. 2012. Organizing the modern firm in the worldwide market for market transactions. Management International Review, 52(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liou, R. S., Chao, M. C. H., & Yang, M. 2016. Emerging economies and institutional quality: Assessing the differential effects of institutional distances on ownership strategy. Journal of World Business, 51(4): 600–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lucea, R., & Doh, J. P. 2012. International strategy for nonmarket environments: Stakeholders, location and networks. Business and Politics, 14(3): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Luo, Y. 2006. Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Luo, Y., & Zhang, H. 2016. Emerging market MNEs: Qualitative review and theoretical directions. Journal of International Management, 22(4): 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Makino, S., Lau, C. M., & Yeh, R. S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Maksimov, V., Wang, S. L., & Luo, Y. 2017. Reducing poverty in the least developed countries: The role of small and medium enterprises. Journal of World Business, 52(2): 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mallon, M. R., & Fainshmidt, S. 2017. Assets of foreignness: A theoretical integration and agenda for future research. Journal of International Management, 23(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Manning, S., Larsen, M. M., & Bharati, P. 2015. Global delivery models: The role of talent, speed and time zones in the global outsourcing industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 850–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. 2017. Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3): 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia–Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mathieu, J. E., & Chen, G. 2011. The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37(2): 610–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Merton, R. K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Business Press.Google Scholar
  78. Michailova, S., Piekkari, R., Storgaard, M., & Tienari, J. 2017. Rethinking ethnocentrism in international business research. Global Strategy Journal. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1159.Google Scholar
  79. Montiel, I., Husted, B. W., & Christmann, P. 2012. Using private management standard certification to reduce information asymmetries in corrupt environments. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9): 1103–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Narula, R., & Verbeke, A. 2015. Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 612–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. National University of Singapore. 2017. Announcement: Conference on global production, 6–8th December 2017. National University of Singapore. http://gpn.nus.edu.sg/conference2017.html. Accessed 19 July 2017.
  83. Nerur, S., Rasheed, A. A., & Pandey, A. 2016. Citation footprints on the sands of time: An analysis of idea migrations in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6): 1065–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nielsen, C., & Thangadurai, M. 2007. Janus and the Delphi Oracle: Entering the new world of international business research. Journal of International Management, 13(2): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oetzel, J., & Doh, J. P. 2009. Multinational enterprise and development: A review and reconceptualization. Journal of World Business, 44(2): 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Olsen, A. O., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. 2016. Coordinated exploration for grand challenges: The role of advocacy groups in search consortia. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6): 2232–2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Parker, G. 2013. Global crisis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J. L., & Martin, X. 2012. Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(5): 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pettigrew, A. M. 1988. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ramamurti, R. 2012. What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Regner, P., & Edman, J. 2014. MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. 2009. Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11): 1157–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. 2007. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problems in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shenkar, O. 2004. One more time: International business in a global economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sturgeon, T., van Biesebroeck, J., & Gereffi, G. 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Ren, B., & Yan, D. 2012. A comparative ownership advantage framework for cross-border M&As: The rise of Chinese and Indian MNEs. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. 2013. Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2): 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. UNFCCC. 2016. UN framework on climate change. http://newsroom.unfccc.int/about/. Accessed 23 January 2017.
  103. United Nations. 2016. Millennium development goals and beyond 2015. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 17 June 2016.
  104. US Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2014. 21st century grand challenges. The White House: US Government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/grandchallenges. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  105. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2015. The new internalization theory and multinational enterprises from emerging economies: A business history perspective. Business History Review, 89(3): 415–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Verbeke, A., Von Glinow, M. A., & Luo, Y. 2017. Becoming a great reviewer: Four actionable guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, C. 2012. Phenomenon-based research in management and organization science: When is it rigorous and does it matter? Long Range Planning, 45(4): 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. 2016. An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal. doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0718.Google Scholar
  109. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Young, S. 2001. What do researchers know about the global business environment? International Marketing Review, 18(2): 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zhang, C., Cavusgil, S. T., & Roath, A. S. 2003. Manufacturer governance of foreign distributor relationships: Do relational norms enhance competitiveness in the export market? Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J Buckley
    • 1
  • Jonathan P Doh
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mirko H Benischke
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for International Business, Leeds University Business SchoolUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Management and OperationsVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship, Rotterdam School of Management (RSM)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations