Advertisement

The differential impact of consumer’s thinking styles on brand placement: a cross-cultural study

  • Chung Hur
  • Jiyoung HwangEmail author
  • Chankoo Yeo
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines how styles of thinking across culture affect consumers’ brand perceptions. Two experiments using printed and film stimuli for two brand placements (i.e., foreground vs. background) were conducted with participants from two countries (USA and Korea) whose culture is characterized by different styles of thinking (analytic vs. holistic thinking). The results indicate that when product or brand placements (PPLs) were located in the background of the scene, holistic thinkers (i.e., East Asians) showed higher brand perceptions than did analytic thinkers (i.e., Westerners). When PPLs were located in the center of the scene, there was no difference in brand recognition and brand recall between analytic and holistic thinkers. The findings of this research shed light on the importance of consumers’ styles of thinking in understanding the effect of brand placement.

Keywords

PPL Brand placement Thinking styles Brand awareness Cross-cultural study 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest involved in this study.

References

  1. Alwitt, L.F., and P.R. Prabhaker. 1992. Functional and belief dimensions of attitudes to television advertising: Implications for copytesting. Journal of Advertising Research 32(5): 30–42.Google Scholar
  2. Babin, L.A., and S.T. Carder. 1996. Viewers’ recognition of brands placed within film. International Journal of Advertising 15(2): 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balasubramanian, S.K. 1994. Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising 23(4): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, I., K.M. Dubas, and L.A. Babin. 1999. The influence of product-placement type and exposure time on product-placement recognition. International Journal of Advertising 18(3): 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, F.F.Y. 2019. Mapping between placement strategies and placed product attributes in television programs. Journal of Marketing Communications.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1570965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, F.F.Y., B. Lowe, and D. Petrovici. 2017. Young adults’ perceptions of product placement in films: An exploratory comparison between the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Journal of Marketing Communications 23(3): 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, F.F.Y., D. Petrovici, and B. Lowe. 2016. Antecedents of product placement effectiveness across cultures. International Marketing Review 33(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chun, W.Y., A.W. Kruglanski, D. Sleeth-Keppler, and R.S. Friedman. 2011. Multifinality in implicit choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(5): 1124–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coker, K.K., and S.A. Altobello. 2018. Product placements in social settings: The impact of coviewing on the recall of placed brands. Journal of Business Research 87: 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Gregorio, F., and Y. Sung. 2010. Understanding attitudes toward and behaviors in response to product placement. Journal of Advertising 39(1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagle, L., and S. Dahl. 2015. Product placement in old and new media: Examining the evidence for concern. Journal of Business Ethics, November,.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2955-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frith, K. and Karan, K. 2007. Global visual: Is a picture worth a thousand words? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Gillespie, B., D.D. Muehling, and I. Kareklas. 2018. Fitting product placements: Affective fit and cognitive fit as determinants of consumer evaluations of placed brands. Journal of Business Research 82: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould, S.J., P.B. Gupta, and S. Grabner-Kräuter. 2000. Product placements in movies: A cross-cultural analysis of Austrian, French and American consumers’ attitudes toward this emerging, international promotional medium. Journal of Advertising 29(4): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta, P.B., and S.J. Gould. 1997. Consumers’ perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placement in movies: Product category and individual differences. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 19(1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, P.B., and K.R. Lord. 1998. Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 20(1): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ha, Y.-W., S. Park, and H.-K. Ahn. 2009. The influence of categorical attributes on choice context effects. Journal of Consumer Research 36(3): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hedden, T., D.C. Park, R.E. Nisbett, L. Ji, Q. Jing, and S. Jiao. 2002. Cultural variation in verbal versus spatial neuropsychological function across the lifespan. Neuropsychology 16(1): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji, L., Z. Zhang, and R.E. Nisbett. 2004. Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(1): 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karrh, J. A. 1994. Effects of brand placement in feature pictures. Proceedings of the 1994 American Academy of Advertising Conference. Karen Whitehill King, ed., 90–96. Athens, GA: American Academy of Advertising.Google Scholar
  21. Laran, J. 2016. Consumer goal pursuit. Current Opinion in Psychology 10: 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, T., Y. Sung, and S.M. Choi. 2011. Young adults’ responses to product placement in movies and television shows: A comparative study of the Unites States and South Korea. International Journal of Advertising 30(3): 479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Makri, K., and B.B. Schlegelmilch. 2017. Time orientation and engagement with social networking sites: A cross-cultural study in Austria, China and Uruguay. Journal of Business Research 80: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masuda, T., and R.E. Nisbett. 2001. Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(5): 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masuda, T., and R.E. Nisbett. 2006. Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science 30(2): 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKechnie, S.A., and J. Zhou. 2003. Product placement in movies: A comparison of Chinese and American consumers’ attitudes. International Journal of Advertising 22(3): 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monga, A.B., and D.R. John. 2008. When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(4): 320–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Monga, A.B., and D.R. John. 2010. What makes brand elastic? The influence of brand concept and thinking styles on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing 74(3): 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morton, C.R., and M. Friedman. 2002. I saw it in the movies: Exploring the link between product placement beliefs and reported usage behavior. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 24(2): 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muzellec, L. 2016. James Bond, Dunder Mifflin, and the future of product placement. https://hbr.org/2016/06/james-bond-dunder-mifflin-and-the-future-of-product-placement Accessed 1st January 2019.
  31. Naderer, B., J. Matthes, and P. Zeller. 2018. Placing snacks in children’s movies: Cognitive, evaluative, and conative effects of product placements with character product interaction. International Journal of Advertising 37(6): 852–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nehenzahl, I.D., and E. Secunda. 1993. Consumers’ attitudes toward product placement in movies. International Journal of Advertising 12(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nelson, M.R., and L.E. McLeod. 2005. Adolescent brand consciousness and product placements: Awareness, liking and perceived effects on self and others. International Journal of Consumer Studies 29(6): 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nisbett, R.E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nisbett, R.E., K. Peng, I. Choi, and A. Norenzayan. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Obermiller, C., and E.R. Spangenberg. 1998. Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2): 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Russell, C.A. 2002. Investigation the effectiveness of product placement in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research 29(3): 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell, C.A. 2019. Expanding the agenda of research on product placement: A commercial intertext. Journal of Advertising 48(1): 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, C.A., and M. Belch. 2005. A managerial investigation into the product placement industry. Journal of Advertising Research 45(1): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sabour, N.I., D. Pillai, G. Gistri, and S.K. Balasubramanian. 2015. Attitudes and related perceptions about product placement: A comparison of Finland, Italy and the United States. International Journal of Advertising 35(2): 362–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon, Michael R. 1996. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having and Being. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Song, R., J. Meyer, and K. Ha. 2015. The relationship between product placement and the performance of movies. Journal of Advertising Research 55(3): 322–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vollmers, S. and Mizerski, R. 1994 A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placements in films. Proceedings of the 1994 American Academy of Advertising Conference, Karen Whitehill King, ed., Athens, GA, 97–102.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, L., S. Wang, L.R. Keller, and J. Li. 2016. Thinking styles affect reactions to brand crisis apologies. European Journal of Marketing 50(7/8): 1263–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Software Policy and Research InstituteSeongnam-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Bryan School of Business and EconomicsThe University of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  3. 3.Senior Researcher of Business Research InstituteSogang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations