Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 38–52 | Cite as

Building corporate reputation through consumer responses to green new products

Original Article
First Online:
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

The importance of sustainability to customers, companies, and society requires an examination of the effects of green new products (GNPs). This study extends past research by examining consumer responses to a GNP and their impact on a parent firm’s corporate reputation (CR). Survey responses were used to test a structural model that investigated whether consumer responses to a new wind farm bolstered an energy service company’s CR. Results suggest adding a GNP to a service company’s portfolio can improve consumer-based perceptions of CR. Perceptions of fit between the GNP and its larger parent company were also found to moderate explanatory links in the model. However, preexisting beliefs consumers held about the value of CSR practices and the importance of the CSR domain in which those actions were engaged did not. Strategic implications discuss how service managers can better use GNP associations to boost CR.

Keywords

Corporate reputation Green new products Services CSR Sustainability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agarwal, J., O. Osiyevskyy, and P. Feldman. 2015. Corporate reputation measurement: Alternative factor structures, nomological validity, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 130(2): 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahluwalia, R., and Z. Gürhan-Canli. 2000. The effects of extensions on the family brand name: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 27(3): 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, R., R. Lynch, T. Melewar, and Z. Jin. 2015. The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research 68(5): 1105–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuckle, J. 1994. AMOS: Analysis of moment structures. Psychometrika 59: 135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R., and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bang, H., A. Ellinger, J. Hadjimarcou, and P. Traichal. 2000. Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing 17(6): 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bearden, W., R. Netemeyer, and J. Teel. 1989. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research 15(4): 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107(2): 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berens, G., C. Van Riel, and G. Van Bruggen. 2005. Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing 69(3): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharya, C., and S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47(1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bromley, D. 2001. Relationships between personal and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing 35: 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, T., and P. Dacin. 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61(1): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnkrant, R., and T. Page. 1982. An examination of the convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of Fishbein’s behavioral intention model. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton, S., and R. Netemeyer. 1992. The effect of enduring, situational, and response involvement on preference stability in the context of voting behavior. Psychology & Marketing 9(2): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, T., and W. Zhu. 2011. Enhancing corporate reputation for market expansion in China: Customer orientation and the mediating effect of product and service quality. Journal of Strategic Marketing 19(2): 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chernev, A., and S. Blair. 2015. Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research 41(2): 1412–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dacin, P., and T. Brown. 2002. Corporate identity and corporate asociations: A framework for future research. Corporate Reputation Review 5(2/3): 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Leaniz, P., and I. Del Bosque. 2013. Intellectual capital and relational capital: The role of sustainability in developing corporate reputation. Intellectual Capital 9(1): 262–280.Google Scholar
  19. Dowling, G., and P. Moran. 2012. Corporate reputations: Built in or bolted on? California Management Review 54(2): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dumaine, B. 2014. Is Apple “greener” than Starbucks? Fortune, 24 June 2014, http://fortune.com/2014/06/24/50-best-global-green-brands-2014/. Accessed May 26, 2016.
  21. Edwards, J. 2009. Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences, ed. C.E. Lance and R.J. Vandenberg, 143–164. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ellen, P., D. Webb, and L. Mohr. 2006. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2): 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fombrun, C., N. Gardberg, and J. Sever. 2000. The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management 7(4): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fombrun, C. 2012. The building blocks of corporate reputation: Definitions, antecedents, consequences. In The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation, ed. M. Barnett and T. Pollock, 94–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Funk, D., and M. Pritchard. 2006. Sport publicity: Commitment’s moderation of message effects. Journal of Business Research 59(5): 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaskin, J. 2016. Structural equation modeling: Testing interaction effects. Accessed March 1, 2016. From Gaskination’s StatWiki, http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com.
  27. Habel, J., L. Schons, S. Alavi, and J. Wieseke. 2016. Warm glow or extra charge? The ambivalent effect of corporate social responsibility activities on customers’ perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing 80(1): 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Hu, L., and P. Bentler. 1998. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 3 (4): 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hooghiemstra, R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keller, K. 2016. Reflections on customer-based brand equity: Perspectives, progress, and priorities. AMS Review 6(1–2): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindell, M., and D. Whitney. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(1): 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lubin, D., and D. Esty. 2010. The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review 88(5): 42–50.Google Scholar
  34. Madrigal, R. 2000. The role of corporate associations in new product evaluation. In Advances in consumer research, vol. 27, ed. S. Hoch and R. Meyer, 80–86. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  35. Makower, J. 2015. Ecoimagination at 10: A status report. Green Biz, https://www.greenbiz.com/article/ecomagination-10-status-report. Accessed May 27, 2016.
  36. McKinsey and Company. 2015. Sustainability’s strategic worth, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/sustainability/sustainabilitys_strategic_worth_mckinsey_global_survey_results. Accessed January 9, 2016.
  37. Mittal, V., W. Ross, and P. Baldasare. 1998. The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. Journal of Marketing 62(1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mysen, T. 2012. Sustainability as corporate mission and strategy. European Business Review 24(6): 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newman, G., M. Gorlin, and R. Dhar. 2014. When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research 41(3): 823–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliver, R. 1993. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 20(3): 418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olsen, M., R. Slotegraaf, and S. Chandukala. 2014. Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing 78(3): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson, E., and H. Thjømøe. 2011. Explaining and articulating the fit construct in sponsorship. Journal of Advertising 40(1): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peloza, J., and J. Shang. 2011. How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39(1): 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pina, J., F. Dall’Olmo Riley, and W. Lomax. 2013. Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Business Research 66(9): 1411–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ping, R. 1995. A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 32(3): 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podsakoff, P., S. Mackenzie, J. Lee, and N. Podsakoff. 2003. Common methods bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pracejus, J., and G. Olsen. 2004. The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research 57(6): 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Preacher, K., and A. Hayes. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(4): 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruekert, R., and G. Churchill Jr. 1984. Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 21(2): 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Savitz, A. 2012. The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success, and how you can too. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, S., and C. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen, S., C. Bhattacharya, and D. Korschun. 2006. The role of CSR in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Research 34(2): 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sheinin, D. 2000. The effects of experience with brand extensions on parent brand knowledge. Journal of Business Research 49(1): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Speed, R., and P. Thompson. 2000. Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2): 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stinson, J., and M. Pritchard. 2014. Leveraging sport for social marketing and corporate social responsibility. In Leveraging brands in sport business, ed. M. Pritchard and J. Stinson, 221–237. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Swofford, J., and M. Slattery. 2010. Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy 38(5): 2508–2519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Unruh, G., and R. Ettenson. 2010. Winning in the Green Frenzy. Harvard Business Review 88(11): 1–6.Google Scholar
  58. Vandenberg, R., and C. Lance. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3(1): 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Rekom, J., G. Berens, and M. Van Halderen. 2013. Corporate social responsibility: Playing to win, or playing not to lose? Doing good by increasing the social benefits of a company’s core activities. Journal of Brand Management 20(9): 800–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker, K. 2010. A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review 12(4): 357–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walsh, G., B. Bartikowski, and S. Beatty. 2014. Impact of customer-based corporate reputation on non-monetary and monetary outcomes: The roles of commitment and service context risk. British Journal of Management 25(1): 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walsh, G., and S. Beatty. 2007. Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35 (1): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walsh, G., K. Dinnie, and K.P. Wiedmann. 2006. How do corporate reputation and customer satisfaction impact customer defection? A study of private energy customers in Germany. Journal of Services Marketing 20(6): 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walsh, G., V. Mitchell, P. Jackson, and S. Beatty. 2009. Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management 20(1): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang, Y., H.P. Lo, and Y.V. Hui. 2003. The antecedents of service quality and product quality and their influence on bank reputation: Evidence from the banking industry in China. Managing Service Quality 13(1): 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winer, R. 1999. Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(3): 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhao, X., J. Lynch, and Q. Chen. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of BusinessEllensburgUSA

Personalised recommendations