Advertisement

Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 522–545 | Cite as

Evaluating the impact of early- and late-acquired phonemes on the luxury appeal of brand names

  • Abhishek Pathak
  • Gemma Calvert
  • Carlos Velasco
Original Article

Abstract

Research has shown that marketers can enhance consumers’ expectations when a product’s attributes are congruent with its packaging, shape, sensory attributes and sound of the brand name (sound symbolism). In the past decade, a reasonable amount of research has focused on sound symbolic attributes of brand names; however, the literature linking the age of acquisition (AoA) of various phonemes, their usage in brand names and their subsequent perception by consumers is lacking. In the present research, we hypothesized that because humans acquire different phonemes at different ages and consequently some phonemes are used more frequently (vs rarely) in everyday conversations and have more concrete (vs abstract) mental representations than late (vs early)-acquired phonemes, this impacts on the way in which brand names are perceived. Specifically, across three experiments, we demonstrate that brand names created from early-acquired phonemes are more suited to basic brands (i.e., brands which are used in an everyday context), whereas brand names created from late-acquired phonemes are more suited for luxury brands. Our research shows an association between the AoA of phonemes, as captured in brand names, and the brand’s perceived luxurious appeal. We discuss the results in light of the literature on speech sound development and provide practical implications for brand managers and marketers.

Keywords

Sound symbolism Luxurious brand name Phonemic age of acquisition Phonetic symbolism 

Abbreviations

AoA

Age of acquisition

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

HBN

Hypothetical brand name

HBBN

Hypothetical basic brand name

HLBN

Hypothetical luxury brand name

IPA

International Phonetic Alphabet/Association

M Turk

Amazon Mechanical Turk

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the funding from the Institute on Asian Consumer Insight and Nanyang Business School, NTU, Singapore.

References

  1. Allott, R. 2005. The child and the world: How children acquire language. In The child and the world: How the child acquires language How language mirrors the world, 1–48. Able Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C.A., A.J. Benjamin, and B.D. Bartholow. 1998. Does the gun pull the trigger? Automatic priming effects of weapon pictures and weapon names. Psychological Science 9 (4): 308–314. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aveyard, M.E. 2012. Some consonants sound curvy: Effects of sound symbolism on object recognition. Memory and Cognition 40 (1): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beasley, D. 2013. X And Z Drug Names Favored By Pharmaceutical Companies. Huffingtonpost. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/25/x-z-drug-names-pharmaceutical-companies_n_2549370.html.
  5. Belke, E., M. Brysbaert, A.S. Meyer, and M. Ghyselinck. 2005. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition 96 (2): B45–B54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird, H., S. Franklin, and D. Howard. 2001. Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 33 (1): 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonin, P., C. Barry, A. Méot, and M. Chalard. 2004. The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language 50 (4): 456–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boslet, M. 2006. It’s Alive. It’s Also Small, Simple: The Ideas Behind the Name ‘Zune’. New York: The Wall Street JournalB3.Google Scholar
  9. Bresciani, S., and M.J. Eppler. 2010. Brand new ventures? Insights on start-ups’ branding practices. Journal of Product & Brand Management 19 (5): 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, G.D.A., and F.L. Watson. 1987. First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory and Cognition 15 (3): 208–216. doi: 10.3758/bf03197718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calvert, G., E. Fulcher, G. Fulcher, P. Foster, and H. Rose. 2014. Using implicit methods to develop an objective measure of media brand engagement. International Journal of Market Research 56 (1): 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caramazza, A., D. Chialant, R. Capasso, and G. Miceli. 2000. Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403 (6768): 428–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carreiras, M., and C.J. Price. 2008. Brain activation for consonants and vowels. Cerebral Cortex 18 (7): 1727–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carreiras, M., M. Vergara, and M. Perea. 2007. ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters 419 (3): 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castles, A., and M. Coltheart. 2004. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition 91 (1): 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Catling, J.C., and R.A. Johnston. 2005. Age of acquisition effects on word generation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17 (2): 161–177. doi: 10.1080/09541440440000078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Catling, J.C., and R.A. Johnston. 2009. The varying effects of age of acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (1): 50–62. doi: 10.1080/17470210701814352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornell, A. 2002. Cult of luxury: The new opiate of the masses. Australian Financial Review 47Google Scholar
  19. Cutler, A., J. Mehler, D. Norris, and J. Segui. 1987. Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 19 (2): 141–177. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90010-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlén, M., F. Lange, and T. Smith. 2010. Marketing communications: A brand narrative approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. De Houwer, J., S. Teige-Mocigemba, A. Spruyt, and A. Moors. 2009. Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin 135 (3): 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delle Luche, C., S. Poltrock, J. Goslin, B. New, C. Floccia, and T. Nazzi. 2014. Differential processing of consonants and vowels in the auditory modality: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Memory and Language 72: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denis, M., J. Engelkamp, and J. Richardson. 2012. Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery, vol. 42. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Dodd, B., A. Holm, Z.H.U. Hua, and S. Crosbie. 2003. Phonological development: A normative study of British English speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17 (8): 617–643. doi: 10.1080/0269920031000111348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dryer, M.S., and M. Haspelmath. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
  26. Dubois, S., and B.M. Horvath. 2004. Cajun vernacular English: Phonology. A handbook of varieties of English 1: 407–416.Google Scholar
  27. Dubois, B., G. Laurent, and S. Czellar. 2001. Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes (No. 736). Jouy-en-Josas: HEC Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Dutchen, S. 2009. A drug by any other name. Retrieved from http://www.brandinstitute.com/jp/news.asp?xread=YES&articleID=9.
  29. Ellis, A.W., S.J. Holmes, and R.L. Wright. 2010. Age of acquisition and the recognition of brand names: On the importance of being early. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellis, A.W., and C.M. Morrison. 1998. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 (2): 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Espinoza, J. 2014. Chinese retailers use brand names like Adidos, Fuma, and Cnoverse to attract consumers. Retrieved from http://www.complex.com/style/2014/12/chinese-use-foreign-brand-names-to-attract-shoppers. 13 April 2017.
  32. Ferreres, A.R., C.V. López, and N.N. China. 2003. Phonological alexia with vowel–consonant dissociation in non-word reading. Brain and Language 84 (3): 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fiebach, C.J., A.D. Friederici, K. Müller, D.Y. von Cramon, and A.E. Hernandez. 2003. Distinct brain representations for early and late learned words. Neuroimage 19 (4): 1627–1637. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00227-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gierut, J.A., and M.L. Morrisette. 2011. Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays. Applied Psycholinguistics 33 (01): 121–144. doi: 10.1017/s0142716411000294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen, J., and M. Wänke. 2011. The abstractness of luxury. Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (5): 789–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heath, D., and C. Heath 2011. How to pick the perfect brand name. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/1702256/how-pick-perfect-brand-name.
  37. Higgins, J. 2010. RP phonemes in the Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.minpairs.talktalk.net/phonfreq.html.
  38. Hoffman, G. 2008. New car namesHow they get ‘em. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/03/07/car.name.game/index.html?_s=PM:LIVING.
  39. Inquisit 4 [Computer software]. 2014. Seattle, WA. Retrieved from www.millisecond.com.
  40. Jakobson, R., and A.R. Keiler. 1968. Child language, aphasia and phonological universals (Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze, engl.-Transl. by Allan R. Keiler.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  41. Jekiel, M. 2014. The evolution of English dental fricatives: Variation and change. Masters Thesis, Institute of English Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.Google Scholar
  42. Kapferer, J.N. 2012. Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth. Business Horizons 55 (5): 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kemp, S. 1998. Perceiving luxury and necessity. Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (5): 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. King, A.M., and J. Cook. 1990. Brand names: The invisible assets. Strategic Finance 72 (5): 41.Google Scholar
  45. Kivetz, R., and I. Simonson. 2002. Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klink, R.R. 2000. Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klink, R.R. 2001. Creating meaningful new brand names: A study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 9 (2): 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klink, R.R. 2003. Creating meaningful brands: The relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters 14 (3): 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Köhler, W. 1967. Gestalt psychology. Psychologische Forschung 31 (1): XVIII–XXX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohli, C., and D.W. LaBahn. 1997. Creating effective brand names: A study of the naming process. Journal of Advertising Research 37 (1): 67–75.Google Scholar
  51. Krishnan, H.S., and S. Shapiro. 1996. Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2 (2): 147.Google Scholar
  52. Labroo, A.A., R. Dhar, and N. Schwarz. 2008. Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (6): 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leonard, L.B., M. Newhoff, and L. Mesalam. 1980. Individual differences in early child phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics 1 (01): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lockwood, G., and M. Dingemanse. 2015. Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in psychology 6.Google Scholar
  55. Luce, P.A., and D.B. Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lipovetsky, G., and E. Roux. 2003. Le luxe éternel: De l’âge du sacré au temps des marques. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  57. Maddieson, I. 2005. Presence of uncommon consonants. Haspelmath et al (eds.), 82–85.Google Scholar
  58. Merrilees, B. 2007. A theory of brand-led SME new venture development. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 10 (4): 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michman, R.D., and E.M. Mazze. 2006. The affluent consumer: Marketing and selling the luxury lifestyle. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  60. Miyazaki, A.D., D. Grewal, and R.C. Goodstein. 2005. The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: A matter of consistency. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neely, J.H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106 (3): 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nueno, J.L., and J.A. Quelch. 1998. The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons 41 (6): 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Olmsted, D.L. 1971. Out of the mouth of babes. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  64. Orton, M. 2012. English Letter FrequencyRedux. Retrieved from http://www.markorton.com/2012/01/10/english-letter-frequency-redux/.
  65. Osler, R. 2004. Making the case for a new brand name. Journal of Brand Management 12 (2): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Özbal, G., C. Strapparava, and M. Guerini. 2012. Brand Pitt: A corpus to explore the art of naming. In LREC (pp. 1822–1828).Google Scholar
  67. Paivio, A., J.C. Yuille, and S.A. Madigan. 1968. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p2): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pantzalis, I. 1995. Exclusivity strategies in pricing and brand extension. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  69. Park, C.W., S. Milberg, and R. Lawson. 1991. Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of consumer research 18 (2): 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paolacci, G., and J. Chandler. 2014. Inside the Turk: Understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (3): 184–188. doi: 10.1177/0963721414531598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Phau, I., and G. Prendergast. 2000. Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the ‘rarity principle’. Journal of Brand Management 8 (2): 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Posner, M.I., and C.R.R. Snyder. 1975. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. Attention and Performance V, 669–682.Google Scholar
  73. Pogacar, R., E. Plant, L.F. Rosulek, and M. Kouril. 2015. Sounds good: Phonetic sound patterns in top brand names. Marketing Letters 26 (4): 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Poole, I. 1934. Genetic development of articulation of consonant sounds in speech. The Elementary English Review 11 (6): 159–161.Google Scholar
  75. Powers, M. H. (1971). Functional disorders of articulation-symptomatology and etiology. Handbook of speech pathology and audiology, 837–876.Google Scholar
  76. Prather, E.M., D.L. Hedrick, and C.A. Kern. 1975. Articulation development in children aged two to four years. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 40 (2): 179. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4002.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ratcliff, R. 1993. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin 114 (3): 510–532. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.114.3.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reilly, J., and J. Kean. 2007. Formal distinctiveness of high-and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science 31 (1): 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Repp, B.H. 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice 10: 243–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roodenrys, S., C. Hulme, A. Lethbridge, M. Hinton, and L.M. Nimmo. 2002. Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (6): 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sander, E.K. 1972. When are speech sounds learned? Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 37 (1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Silverstein, M., N. Fiske, and J. Butman. 2003. Trading up: The new American luxury: Portfolio (Hardcover).Google Scholar
  83. Smit, A.B., L. Hand, J.J. Freilinger, J.E. Bernthal, and A. Bird. 1990. The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska Replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 55 (4): 779. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5504.779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Solomon, R.L., and L. Postman. 1952. Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (3): 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Spence, C. 2012. Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (1): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Spiegel, A. 2015. Häagen-Dazs doesn’t come from where you think it comes from. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/13/haagen-dazs-comes-from_n_7266208.html. 13 April 2017.
  87. Stepney, R. 2010. A dose by any other name would not sell as sweet. BMJ 341: c6895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Storkel, H.L. 2004. Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25 (02): 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Templin, M.C. 1957. Certain language skills in children; their development and interrelationships.Google Scholar
  90. Tirrell, M., E. Chemi, and M. Fahey. 2015. What’s in a name? For drugs, a lot of Zs and Xs. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/09/whats-in-a-name-for-drugs-a-lot-of-zs-and-xs.html.
  91. Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2000. Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6): 876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2003. Temporal construal. Psychological Review 110 (3): 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117 (2): 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Truong, Y., R. McColl, and P.J. Kitchen. 2009. New luxury brand positioning and the emergence of masstige brands. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5–6): 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Velasco, C., A. Salgado-Montejo, F. Marmolejo-Ramos, and C. Spence. 2014. Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference 34: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vigneron, F., and L.W. Johnson. 2004. Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management 11 (6): 484–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vitevitch, M.S. 2002. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (4): 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vitevitch, M.S., and A.J. Donoso. 2012. Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that! Psychological Research 76 (6): 693–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vitevitch, M.S., and P.A. Luce. 1998. When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 9 (4): 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Walker, P. 2016. Cross-sensory correspondences: A theoretical framework and their relevance to music. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain.. doi: 10.1037/pmu0000130.Google Scholar
  101. Wellman, B.L., I.M. Case, I.G. Mengert, and D.E. Bradbury. 1931. Speech sounds of young children. Iowa City: University of Iowa Studies: Child Welfare.Google Scholar
  102. Whissell, C. 1998. Are phonemes mastered early more likely to be used in highly imaged as opposed to abstract nouns? A test of predictions based on Jakobson’s theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills 87 (3 suppl): 1208–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Whissell, C. 2003. Pronounceability: A measure of language samples based on children’s mastery of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills 96 (3): 748–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Whittlesea, B.W. 1993. Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (6): 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yoon, C., C.A. Cole, and M.P. Lee. 2009. Consumer decision making and aging: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yorkston, E., and G. Menon. 2004. A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zinkhan, G.M., and C.R. Martin. 1987. New brand names and inferential beliefs: Some insights on naming new products. Journal of Business Research 15 (2): 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhishek Pathak
    • 1
  • Gemma Calvert
    • 1
  • Carlos Velasco
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute on Asian Consumer InsightNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.BI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway
  3. 3.Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations