Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds?
- 1 Downloads
The young growing market for green bonds offers investors the opportunity to take an explicit focus on climate protecting investment projects. However, it is an open question whether this new asset class is also offering attractive risk–return profiles compared to conventional (non-green) bonds. To address this question, we match daily i-spreads of green-labeled and similar non-green-labeled bonds and look at their pricing differentials. We find that rating classes AA–BBB of green bonds as well as the full sample trade marginally tighter for the respective period compared to non-green bonds of the same issuers. Furthermore, financial and corporate green bonds trade tighter than their comparable non-green bonds, and government-related bonds on the other hand trade marginally wider. Issue size, maturity and currency do not have a significant influence on differences in pricing but industry and ESG rating.
KeywordsGreen bond ESG criteria Corporate financial performance Credit rating
We thank Florian Kiesel, Sacha Kolaric and participants of the Green Summit conference in Liechtenstein for valuable comments.
- Amato, J., and E. Remolona. 2003. The credit spread puzzle. Basel: BIS Quarterly Review.Google Scholar
- Bao, J., Pan, J., and Wang, J. (2011) The illiquidity of corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance (LXVI No 3), pp. 911–945. https://doi.org/10.2469/dig.v41.n4.14.
- Bloomberg. Investors are willing to pay a ‘green’ premium. Bloomberg New Energy Finance Report 2017.Google Scholar
- Boulle, B., Frandon-Martinez, C. and Pitt-Watson, J. (2016) Bonds and climate change. The state of the market in 2016. Climate Bonds Initiative.Google Scholar
- Ceci, M. (2016) Green, Social and Sustainability Bonds. J.P.Morgan.Google Scholar
- Climate Bonds Initiative. 2017. Green bonds highlights 2016.Google Scholar
- Driessen, J. 2003. Is default event risk priced in corporate bonds? Mimeo, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Frooman, J., C. Zietsma and B. McKnight (2008) There is no good reason not to be good. Administrative Science Association of Canada (ASAC), Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
- Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. 2017. 2016 Global sustainable investment review.Google Scholar
- ICMA International Capital Markets Association. 2016. Green bond principles, 2016. Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds.Google Scholar
- KfW. 2016. Invest in the everlasting. Green Bonds—Made by KfW.Google Scholar
- Karpf, A., and Mandel A. 2017. Does it pay to be green? Working paper, Université Paris.Google Scholar
- Krimphoff, J. et al. 2016. Green bonds must keep the green promise! A call for collective action towards effective and credible standards for the green bond market. WWF. Paris.Google Scholar
- Mann, S., and F. Fabozzi. 2013. Relative value analysis of fixed-income products. In Encyclopedia of financial models, vol. 1, ed. Frank J. Fabozzi. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Oikonomou, I., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin (2011) The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance DP2011-19.Google Scholar
- Preclaw, R., and A. Bakshi. 2015. The cost of being green. New York: Barclays Research.Google Scholar
- Principles for Responsible Investment. 2016. Principles for responsible investment. An investor initiative in partnership with UNEP Finance Initiative and the UN Global Compact.Google Scholar
- Ridley, M., W. Chan, and C. Edwards. 2016. Global green bonds. The Big Long. HSBC Global Research.Google Scholar
- Ridley, M. and C. Edwards. 2017. Global green bonds. Outlook for 2017: The end of the beginning. HSBC Global Research.Google Scholar
- Zerbib, O. (2017) The green bond premium. Working Paper, Tilburg School of Economics and Management.Google Scholar