Journal of Asset Management

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 540–555 | Cite as

Time aggregation of the Sharpe ratio

  • Ziemowit Bednarek
  • Pratish Patel
  • Cyrus A. Ramezani
Original Article

Abstract

The Sharpe ratio (SR) is the most widely used risk-adjusted performance index. The building blocks of the SR – the expected return and the volatility – depend on the investment horizon. This raises a natural question: how does the SR vary with investment horizon? To address this question, we derive an explicit expression for the SR as a function of the investment horizon for both simple and log-returns. Assuming independent normal returns distribution, we show that for simple returns, the SR is humped shaped – it rises and then falls with the investment horizon. This finding suggests that time aggregation of the SR using the square-root-t rule will lead to significant errors in ranking portfolios. For log-returns, we show that the SR monotonically rises with the horizon and the square-root-t rule holds true. Using robust bootstrap sampling methods, we empirically corroborate our theory with annual data for a large number of important style portfolios, based on size, book-to-market, and other investment criteria. Our empirical analysis provides robust benchmark SRs for these portfolios over investment horizons that span from one to twenty-five years. Our findings have important implications for investors and portfolio managers who rely on SR for asset-allocation and performance-evaluation decisions.

Keywords

Sharpe ratio performance evaluation 

JEL Classification

G11 G12 

References

  1. Campbell, J.Y. (2003) Consumption-based asset pricing. In: Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 1, 803–887.Google Scholar
  2. Evensky, H.R. (1997) Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Investing and Managing Client Assets, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Hodges, C.W., Taylor, W.R. and Yoder, J.A. (1997) Stocks, bonds, the Sharpe ratio, and the investment horizon. Financial Analysts Journal 53: 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ingersoll, J., Spiegel, M., Goetzmann., W. and Welch, I. (2007) Portfolio performance manipulation and manipulation-proof performance measures. The Review of Financial Studies 20(5): 1503–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kidd, D. (2011) The Sharpe ratio and the information ratio. Investment Performance Measurement Feature Articles 2011(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
  6. Levy, H. (1972) Portfolio performance and the investment horizon. Management Science 18(12): 632–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin, M.C. and Chou, P.H. (2003) The pitfall of using Sharpe ratio. Finance Letters 1: 84–89.Google Scholar
  8. Lo, A.W. (2002) The statistics of Sharpe ratios. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(4): 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maginn, J., Tuttle, D., Pinto, J. and McLeavey, D. (eds.) (2007) Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process 3rd edn., CFA Institute Investment Series, New York: Wiley, pp. 477–571.Google Scholar
  10. Sharpe, W.F. (1998) The Sharpe ratio. Streetwise–the Best of the Journal of Portfolio Management, pp. 169–185.Google Scholar
  11. Stutzer, M. (2000) A portfolio performance index. Financial Analysts Journal 56(3): 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ziemowit Bednarek
    • 1
  • Pratish Patel
    • 1
  • Cyrus A. Ramezani
    • 1
  1. 1.Finance AreaOrfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University San Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations