Advertisement

Prohibited sub-state public diplomacy: the attempt to dissolve Catalonia’s DIPLOCAT

  • Colin AlexanderEmail author
  • Albert Royo i Marine
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The attempt by the Spanish state to dissolve the Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia (DIPLOCAT) in the aftermath of the 2017 Catalonian referendum on self-determination is an interesting story in and of itself but it also has implications for understandings of public diplomacy and relationships between state and sub-state governments. This article is the result of academic and practitioner collaboration to provide a detailed critical account of the recent occurrences in Catalonia’s public diplomacy history. One part of the authorship provided an auto-ethnographic account of his experiences and a history of DIPLOCAT’s activities, providing evidence where necessary to confirm accuracy. Once this was completed it was sent to the academic party of the authorship who had control over the structure, theoretical framework and the critical analysis that is provided on these pages. The research reveals that DIPLOCAT managed the pro-independence organisations within its consortium relatively well. However, its dissolution in the aftermath of the 1st October 2017 referendum appears to be case of guilt by association with a group of organisations that Spanish central power sought to punish and dissolve. This is despite DIPLOCAT following a similar strategic focus and structure to its predecessor organisations, which were tolerated by Madrid, and the Rajoy administration not seeking the closure of public diplomacy organisations in other Spanish regions with similar structures. To this end, DIPLOCAT was targeted by Madrid for two reasons. First: its work, and its foundation under the acronym DIPLOCAT in 2012 amidst other pro-referendum and pro-independence pivots in Catalan politics, led to a (not unreasonable) perception of its preference for Catalan statehood; and second, the very fact that it gained traction with distinguished international audiences and was perceived as being successful at raising Catalonia’s profile and foreign awareness of issues surrounding the province at a time when Madrid would have preferred a greater amount of control over the political narrative. As such, Madrid’s hard-fisted actions reveal their own tacit awareness of their communications weaknesses and fears over the power of DIPLOCAT.

Keywords

Catalonia/Catalunya Referendum Sub-state Public Diplomacy DIPLOCAT 

Notes

References

  1. Alexander, C. 2014. Sub-state Public Diplomacy in Africa: The Case of the Scottish Government’s Engagement with Malawi. Journal of Public Diplomacy and Place Branding 10 (1): 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amnesty International. 2018. Spain: Leading Catalan figures Jordi Sànchez and Jordi Cuixart Should be Freed. World Wide Web. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/spain-leading-catalan-figures-jordi-sanchez-and-jordi-cuixart-should-be-freed-0. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  3. Aronczyk, M. 2013. Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balfour, S. 2005. The Politics of Contemporary Spain. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busby, J. 2010. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornago, N. 2000. Exploring the Global Dimensions of Paradiplomacy: Functional and Normative Dynamics in the Global Spreading of Subnational Involvment in International Affairs. In Workshop on Constituent Units in International Affairs. Hanover, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. Crawford, N. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonialization and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Criekemans, D. 2010. Regional Sub-state Diplomacy from a Comparative Perspective: Quebec, Scotland, Bavaria, Catalonia, Wallonia and Flanders. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5: 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cull, N. 2010. Public Diplomacy: Seven Lessons for Its Future from Its Past. Journal of Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6 (1): 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowling, A. 2013. Catalonia Since the Spanish Civil War: Reconstructing the Nation. Portland, OR: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Encarnacion, O.G. 2014. Democracy Without Justice in Spain: The Politics of Forgetting. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, C. 2012a. Using Strategic Communication for Nation-Building in Contemporary Spain: The Basque Case. International Journal of Strategic Communications 6 (3): 212–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia, C. 2012b. The Use of Sports as a Tool of Public Diplomacy in Regions or “Stateless Nations”: The Case of the Basque Country in Contemporary Spain. Journal of Sports Media 7 (2): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goirizelaia, M., and L. Iturregui. 2018. From Cultural Showcases to Public Diplomacy Agents: Basque-American Festivals in the United States. Journal of Diaspora Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2018.1485240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haugevik, K., and I. Neumann. 2019. Kinship in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Huijgh, E. 2010. The Public Diplomacy of Federated Entities: Excavating the Quebec Model. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huijgh, E. 2012. The Future of Sub-state Public Diplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine.  https://doi.org/10.06700/1094940151162165141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institut Ramon Llull (IRL). 2019. Homepage. World Wide Web. https://www.llull.cat/catala/home/index.cfm. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  19. Johnson, M. 2018. Culture as Soft Power: Digital Branding by Catalonia, the Basque Country and Scotland. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 10 (1): 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuznetsov, A. 2014. Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Affairs. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lecours, A. 2002. Paradiplomacy: Reflections on the Foreign Policy and International Relations of Regions. International Negotiation 7: 91.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry for Foreign Action. 2019. Government Delegations Abroad. http://exteriors.gencat.cat/en/ambits-dactuacio/afers_exteriors/delegacions_govern/. Accessed 12 July 2019.
  23. Molina, I. 2017. La diplomacia en la era de Twitter [Diplomacy in the era of Twitter], 4. El Pais (Ideas), 3rd December.Google Scholar
  24. Romero, F.J. 1999. Twentieth-Century Spain: Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Royo, S., and P.C. Manuel. 2003. Spain and Portugal in the European Union: The First Fifteen Years. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  26. Snow, N. 2008. Rethinking Public Diplomacy. In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, Chap. 1, ed. N. Snow and P. Taylor. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, P. 2008. Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communications. In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, Chap. 2, ed. N. Snow and P. Taylor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Teller Report. 2019. Court of Accounts: The Govern Used Public Money to Promote the Independence Movement Abroad. World Wide Web. http://www.tellerreport.com/news/–court-of-accounts–the-govern-used-public-money-to-promote-the-independence-movement-abroad-.ryxoOx89uV.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.
  29. Torras-Vila, J., and J. Fernandez-Cavia. 2017. DIPLOCAT’s Public Diplomacy Role and the Perceptions Towards Catalonia Among International Correspondents. Journal of Place Branding and Public Diplomacy.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-017-0073-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wyn Jones, R., and E. Royles. 2012. Wales in the World: Intergovernmental Relations and Sub-state Diplomacy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14: 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  2. 2.DIPLOCATBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations