Advertisement

Place Branding and Public Diplomacy

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 47–54 | Cite as

Foresight revisited: visions of twenty-first century diplomacy

  • James Pamment
Original Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

In 1999, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) board sanctioned an internal report into how the organisation should look in 2010. It was conducted by the successor generation of faststream diplomats and was eventually completed in 2000. The Foresight Report was never released into the public domain, and indeed its existence was not openly acknowledged for a further 3 years. In particular, a controversial “memo to ministers,” criticising the interaction between elected officials and diplomats, created a major stir behind the scenes. Its discussions of digital technologies and the role of public discourse in diplomacy paint a compelling picture of the institution in a process of irreversible change. As a document marking the crossroads between the end of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first, Foresight provides crucial insight into the currents and trends motivating diplomatic reform. This article focuses upon visions of twenty-first century British diplomacy from the perspective of the late 1990s. Its particular point of interest is in the trajectories surrounding the future of diplomats, digital technologies, public diplomacy, and the integration of the FCO in Whitehall.

Keywords

Cool Britannia Foreign & Commonwealth Office Public diplomacy Soft power United Kingdom 

References

  1. Brown, G. 1998. Modern Public Services for Britain: Investing in Reform Comprehensive Spending Review: New Public Spending Plans 1999-2002 (July 1998). London: The Stationary Office Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Cornago, N. 2013. Plural Diplomacies: Normative Predicaments and Functional Imperatives. Leiden & Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Council, Design. 1997. New Brand for a New Britain. London: The Design Council.Google Scholar
  4. Dickie, J. 2004. The New Mandarins: How British Foreign Policy Works. New York: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  5. FCO. 1995. Foreign & Commonwealth Office (Diplomatic Wing) Fundamental Expenditure Review (September 1995). London: Foreign & Commonwealth Office.Google Scholar
  6. FCO. 1996. Foreign & Commonwealth Office including Overseas Development Administration The Government’s Expenditure Plans 1996–1997 to 1998–1999 (CM 3203). London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  7. FCO. 1997. Foreign & Commonwealth Office including Overseas Development Administration The Government’s Expenditure Plans 1997–1998 to 1999–2000 (CM 3603). London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  8. FCO 2000. Foresight Report unpublished.Google Scholar
  9. FCO. 2001. e-diplomacy: The FCO e-business Strategy (July 2001). London: FCO.Google Scholar
  10. FCO. 2003. UK International Priorities: A Strategy for the FCO (Cm 6052). London: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  11. FCO. 2006. Active Diplomacy for a Changing World: The UK’s International Priorities (Cm 6762). London: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  12. FCO. 2008a. Better World, Better Britain. London: Foreign & Commonwealth Office.Google Scholar
  13. FCO. 2008b. Foreign & Commonwealth Office Resource Accounts 2007–2008 (For the year ended 31 March 2008) (HC 614). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  14. FCO. 2012. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office Digital Strategy. London: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  15. FCO 2013. Diplomatic Excellence MFA Briefing .Google Scholar
  16. Gregory, B. 2016. Mapping Boundaries in Diplomacy’s Public Dimension. Hague Journal of Diplomacy 11: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, I. 2013. Building the Global Network?. The Reform of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office under New Labour. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 15: 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hocking, B., J. Melissen, S. Riordan, and P. Sharp. 2012. Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.Google Scholar
  19. Hocking, B., and J. Melissen. 2015. Diplomacy in the Digital Age. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.Google Scholar
  20. Leonard, M. 1997. Britain™: Renewing Our Identity. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  21. Melissen, J. (ed.). 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Melissen, J., and M. Caesar-Gordon. 2016. “Digital diplomacy” and the securing of nationals in a citizen-centric world. Global Affairs.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2016.1239381.Google Scholar
  23. Miliband D. 2008. Hansard 23 Jan 2008: Column 52WS. Available electronically at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080123/wmstext/80123m0001.htm#08012347000076.
  24. Pamment, J. 2016. British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power: Diplomatic Influence and Digital Disruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman, T. 2011. Women in diplomacy: an assessment of British female ambassadors in overcoming gender hierarchy, 1990–2010. American Diplomacy. 2011 Apr 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Pamment
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Strategic CommunicationLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations