Advertisement

Generational and life-cycle effects on support for Quebec independence

  • Yannick DufresneEmail author
  • Charles Tessier
  • Eric Montigny
Original Article

Abstract

The resurgence of separatist movements in Scotland and Catalonia illuminate the ebb and flow of such movements over time. The catalysts of separatism in post-industrial democracies are largely treated as circumstantial, but intergenerational data on attitudes towards independence might assist the development of a general theory of support for separatism. This replace draws on the case of Quebec, leveraging a half-century worth of public opinion data to investigate intergenerational shifts in attitudes towards separatism. Historical data from the Canadian Election Study (CES 1968–2011) allow us to test the relationship between attitudes towards independence among youth in Quebec and general levels of support for separatism. Coupled with this are the more than 1 million observations from the 2011 Canadian federal as well as the 2012 and 2014 Quebec provincial editions of Vote Compass. This last dataset allows us to estimate the variation in support for Quebec independence for very precise age groups defined at the year-of-birth level. The results show a clear generational cycle variation that appears correlated with specific series of historical events.

Keywords

Quebec separatism Generations effects Public opinion Political socialization Canada Electoral behaviour 

Notes

References

  1. Alvarez, M., M. Franklin, L. de Sio, and A. Trechsel. 2011. Weighting and Matching as Methods for Combining Disparate Survey Data: The European Election Study 2009 and EU Profiler. Presented at the 2011 Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  2. Alwin, D.F., and R. McCammon. 2003. Generations, Cohorts, and Social Change. In Handbook of the Life Course, ed. Jeylan T. Mortimer and Michael J. Shanahan, 23–49. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, R. 2001. National Identity and Independence Attitudes: Minority Nationalism in Scotland and Wales. Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends Working Paper Number 86.Google Scholar
  4. Asselin, P. 2014. Le parti aveugle. Le Soleil 10th June 2014:17.Google Scholar
  5. Balthazar, L. 2013. Nouveau bilan du nationalisme au Québec. Montréal: VLB Editeur.Google Scholar
  6. Cloutier, Edouard, J.-H. Guay, and D. Latouche. 1992. Le virage: comment le Québec est devenu souverainiste. Montréal: Québec/Amérique.Google Scholar
  7. Crête, J. (ed.). 1984. Comportement électoral au Québec. Chicoutimi: Gaëtan Morin éditeur.Google Scholar
  8. Daoust, J.-F. 2017. Le mystère Québec. Politique et Sociétés 36(2): 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinas, E., and L. Stoker. 2014. Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: A Design-Based Approach. Electoral Studies 33: 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erikson, R.S., M.B. MacKuen, and J.A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fournier, P., F. Gélineau, and A. Harell. 2014. Are Voting Advice Applications” Working Paper. Useful for the Study of Elections? Working Paper.Google Scholar
  12. Fournier, P., F. Gélineau, and A. Harell. 2015. Les systèmes d’aide au vote peuvent-ils être utiles pour l’étude des élections? Revue internationale de politique comparée 22(2):269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagné, G., and S. Langlois. 2002. Les raisons fortes. Nature et signification de l’appui à la souveraineté du Québec. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gagnon, K. 2014a. Le projet de deux générations. La Presse June 3rd 2014:4–5.Google Scholar
  15. Gagnon, K. 2014b. Radiographie politique d’une génération. Le Droit June 2nd:15.Google Scholar
  16. Ghitza, Y., and A. Gelman. 2014. The Great Society, Reagan’s Revolution, and Generations of Presidential Voting. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Grégoire, M., E. Montigny, and Y. Rivest. 2016. Le cœur des Québécois: Évolution du Québec depuis 1976. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  18. Guibernau, M. 2014. Radiographie politique d’une génération. The International Spectator 49(3): 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson, A. 2005. Identity Measurement in Scotland and Québec: The Meaning and Salience of Identity Markers. British Journal of Canadian Studies 18(2): 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson, A., and C. Coates. 2005. Introduction: Scotland and Québec: An Evolving Comparison. British Journal of Canadian Studies 18(2): 207–2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langlois, S. 2017. Le Québec change. Montréal: DelBusso.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis-Beck, M.S., W.J. Jacoby, H. Norpoth, and H.F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahéo, V., and É. Bélanger. 2018. Is the Parti Québécois Bound to Disappear? A Study of the Current Generational Dynamics of Electoral Behaviour in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Political Science 51(2): 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, P. 1994. Générations politiques, rationalité économique et appui à la souveraineté au Québec. Canadian Journal of Political Science 27(2): 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, P., and R. Nadeau. 2002. Understanding Opinion Formation on Quebec Sovereignty. In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, ed. Joanna Everitt and Brenda O’Neill, 142–159. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. McRoberts, K. 1999. Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Monière, D., and J.H. Guay (eds.). 1996. La bataille du Québec -Troisième épisode: 30 jours qui ébranlèrent le Canada. Boucherville: Fides.Google Scholar
  28. Montigny, E. 2018. Un bilan de l’expérience référendaire québécoise. In La démocratie référendaire dans les ensembles plurinationaux, ed. Amélie Binette and Patrick Taillon, 505–525. Québec: PUL.Google Scholar
  29. Nadeau, R. 1992. Le virage souverainiste des Québécois, 1980–1990. Recherches sociographiques. 33(1): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nadeau, R., and E. Bélanger. 2013. Un modèle général d’explication du vote des Québécois. In Les Québécois aux urnes, ed. Frédérick Bastien, Eric Bélanger, and François Gélineau, 191–208. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paterson, L. 2006. Sources of Support for the SNP. In Has Devolution Delivered?, ed. Catherine Bromley, 46–68. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pianzola, J. 2014. Selection Biases in Voting Advice Application Research. Electoral Studies 36: 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinard, M., R. Bernier, and V. Lemieux. 1997. Un combat inachevé. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, A. 2014. Age and Variations in the Attitude towards Scottish Independence—An Exploration of Cohort and Lifecycle Explanations. Scottish Affairs 23(1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Serrano, I. 2013. Just a Matter of Identity? Support for Independence in Catalonia. Regional & Federal Studies 23(5): 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soerensen, R.J. 2013. Does Aging Affect Preferences for Welfare Spending? A Study of Peoples’ Spending Preferences in 22 Countries, 1985–2006. European Journal of Political Economy 29: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Studlar, D.T., and I. McAllister. 1988. Nationalism in Scotland and Wales: A PostIndustrial Phenomenon? Ethnic & Racial Studies 11(1): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tesler, M. 2015. Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed. American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 806–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tilley, J. 2002. Political Generations and Partisanship in the UK, 1964–1997. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 165(1): 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vallée-Dubois, F., R. Dassonville, and J.F. Godbout. 2017. About Time: Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Support for Quebec Sovereignty. Nation and Nationalism 1–22.Google Scholar
  41. Vries, M.S.D. 2005. Changing Policy Views at the Local Level: The Effect of Age, Generations and Policy-Periods in five European Countries. European Journal of Political Research 44(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, W., D. Rothschild, S. Goel, and A. Gelman. 2015. Forecasting Elections with Non-representative Polls. International Journal of Forecasting 3(3): 980–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yannick Dufresne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charles Tessier
    • 2
  • Eric Montigny
    • 1
  1. 1.Université LavalQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations