“After Calais”: creating and managing (in)security for refugees in Europe
- 15 Downloads
In October 2016, the dismantlement of the main refugee camp in the Calais region began. This camp, often known as the “Jungle” had become a symbol of the refugee “crisis” at the heart of Europe, at once a growing point of contention between the British and French Governments both claiming that they were attempting to secure their borders, and a visible reminder of the insalubrious and insanitary conditions in which refugees were living in European borderlands. Following the destruction of the camp refugees was dispatched to various reception centres across France, but these have proved largely unsuitable to their needs, and in some cases have facilitated deportation. Meanwhile, refugees have continued to come to Calais and remain subject to restrictive policing and “security” policies. This article will examine the “mismanagement” of the refugee camps in and around Calais, arguing that French government policy has been largely reactive, led by competing and often contradictory demands coming from various sources at local, international or European levels. This non-intervention can be seen as creating insecurity through inaction: leaving refugees to endure insalubrious and dangerous conditions as various political authorities seem to hope that the “problem” of Calais will disappear. Further, attempts to “secure” borders have led to increasingly insecure conditions for the refugees themselves, and have made it more difficult for those who are attempting to support them. Finally, the failure of the French and British governments to propose any suitable long-term solution to the issue of refugees in Calais can be seen as a reflection of the wider failure of EU policies, and of the ways in which inaction and mismanagement can in itself constitute a form of violence against these refugees.
KeywordsCalais Refugees Security France Europe Borders
- Allsopp, J. 2017. Aggressor, victim, soldier, dad: Intersecting masculinities in the European ‘refugee crisis’. In A gendered approach to the Syrian refugee crisis, ed. J. Freedman, Z. Kivilcim, and N. Ozgur Baklacioglu, 155–175. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Andersen, D., and M. Sandberg. 2012. Introduction. In The border multiple: The practices of borders between public policy and everyday life, ed. D. Andersen, M. Klatt, and M. Sandberg, 1–19. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Ansems de Vries, L. 2016. The transience and persistence of the “Jungle” in Calais”. Open Democracy, 27 Feb 2016. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/leonie-ansems-de-vries/transience-and-persistence-of-jungle-in-calais.
- Balibar, E. 1998. The borders of Europe. In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation, ed. P. Cheah and B. Robbins, 216–229. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Bouagga, Y., and Pette, M. 2017. L’aide aux migrants à Calais. In La Cartographie 2017 des engagements volontaires et solidaires à l’international, ed. C. Leroux and O. Pissoat, 23–28. Observatoire de France Volontaires.Google Scholar
- Clochard, O. 2007. Le jeu des frontières dans l’accès au statut de réfugié - Une géographie des politiques européennes d’asile et d’immigration. Doctoral Thesis, Université de Poitiers.Google Scholar
- Clochard, O. 2016. Calais: The show of force continues. The conversation, 24 Oct 2016. https://theconversation.com/after-the-calais-jungle-is-there-a-long-term-solution-views-from-france-and-britain-67352.
- Cuttitta, P. 2014. “Borderizing” the island: Setting and narratives of Lampedusa “border play”. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 13(2): 196–219.Google Scholar
- Djigo, S. 2016. Les migrants de Calais: Enquête sur la vie en transit. Marseille: Agone.Google Scholar
- Edelman, M. 1977. Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2003. Council Regulation EC No. 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third country national.Google Scholar
- FNARS. 2016. Enquête: Etat des lieux des centres d’accueil et d’orientation. Paris: FNARS.Google Scholar
- Freedman, J. 2004. Immigration and insecurity in France. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Freedman, J. 2018a. Amateur humanitarianism, social solidarity and “volunteer tourism” in the EU refugee “crisis”. In Humanitarian action and ethics, ed. A. Ahmad and J. Smith. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Freedman, J. 2018b. The uses and abuses of “vulnerability” in EU asylum and refugee protection: Protecting women or reducing autonomy?’ Papeles del CEIC; International Journal on Collective Identity Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- GISTI. 2017. Le camp humanitaire parisien: un piège pour les exiles. Paris: GISTI. http://www.gisti.org/spip.php?article5642. Accessed 1 July 2018.
- Human Rights Watch. 2015. France: Les migrants et les demandeurs d’asile victimes de violence et démunis. Paris: Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/fr/news/2015/01/20/france-les-migrants-et-les-demandeurs-dasile-victimes-de-violence-et-demunis. Accessed 31 May 2018.
- Huysmans, J. 2006. The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jeandesboz, J., and P. Pallister-Wilkins. 2014. Crisis, enforcement and control at the EU borders. In Crisis and migration: Critical perspectives, ed. A. Lindley, 115–135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kobelinsky, C. and C. Makaremi (eds.). 2009. Enfermés, dehors: Enquêtes sur le confinement des étrangers. Bellecombe-en-Bauges: Editions du Croquant.Google Scholar
- Kramsch, O. 2010. The rabelaisian border. Society and Space 28(6): 1000–1014.Google Scholar
- Laacher, S. 2002. Après Sangatte: Nouvelles immigrations, nouveaux enjeux. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
- La Cimade. 2015. Petit aperçu de ce que raconte Calais. Paris: La Cimade.Google Scholar
- La Cimade. 2017. CAO: Premier bilan après le démantèlement. Paris: La Cimade.Google Scholar
- Mezzadra, S. 2006. Citizen and subject: A postcolonial constitution for the European Union. Situations 1(2): 31–42.Google Scholar
- Ryan, B. 2004. The European dimension to British border control. Journal of Immigration, Asylum and National Law 18(1): 6–16.Google Scholar
- Squire, V. 2011. The contested politics of mobility: Borderzones and irregularity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vignon, J. 2017. Calais, Questions Françaises, Réponses Européennes. Etudes 2017/6: 33–44.Google Scholar
- Vila, P. 2003. Ethnography at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Wright, M. 2006. Disposable women and other myths of global capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar