French Politics

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 406–438 | Cite as

Back to their roots: French MPs in their district

Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The aim of this article was to investigate the district work of members of the French National Assembly (MPs), namely their contacts with citizens and other kinds of actors on the ground. Based on original data, our results show that the MPs’ constituency work is somewhat disconnected from the national political debate. They are close to their constituents and meet them regularly in surgeries or during local celebrations and events. Issues discussed are mainly oriented towards individual and local needs (housing, employment, etc.). A multivariate analysis highlights the different patterns of district work. Overall, this article suggests that district features and the MPs’ individual characteristics shape their behaviour in their constituency. By exploring the concrete practices of French MPs at home, this article offers new insights into parliamentary representation and into the different logics that underlie district work.

Keywords

parliament MPs district work Assemblée nationale representation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abélès, M. (1989) Jours tranquilles en 89. Ethnologie politique d’un département français. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  2. André, A., Depauw, S. and Martin, S. (2015) Electoral systems and legislators’ constituency effort: The mediating effect of electoral vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies 48(4): 464–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. André, A., Bradbury, J. and Depauw, S. (2014a) Constituency service in multi-level democracies. Regional and Federal Studies 24(2): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. André, A., Freire, A. and Papp, Z. (2014b) Electoral rules and legislators’ personal vote-seeking. In: K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds.) Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. André, A., Gallagher, M. and Sandri, G. (2014c) Legislators’ constituency orientation. In: K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds.) Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, L. (2012) Faut-il abolir le cumul des mandats? Paris: éditions de la rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar
  7. Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg O. (2012) Introduction. In: M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.) Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. London: Routlegde/ECPR.Google Scholar
  8. Briquet, J.-L. (1990) Les amis de mes amis… Registres de la mobilisation politique dans la Corse rurale. Mots 25(1): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brouard, S. and Kerrouche E. (2013) L’effet candidat lors des élections parlementaires. L’exemple des élections législatives 2012 en France. Revue Française de Science Politique 63(6): 1113–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina M. (1979) The house is not a home: British MPs in their constituencies. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4): 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M. (1984) The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U.S. representatives and british members of parliament. American Political Science Review 78(1): 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carey, J. M. and Shugart, M. S. (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral studies 14(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M. (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiru, M. (2011) Unobserved responsiveness? An analysis of constituency service in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the 7th CEU Conference in Social Sciences. Budapest, 27–29 May 2011.Google Scholar
  15. Costa, O. (ed.) (2014) Parliamentary Representation in France. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Costa, O. and Kerrouche, E. (2007) Qui sont les députés français? Enquête sur des élites inconnues. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  17. Costa, O. and Kerrouche, E. (2009) Representative roles in the French national assembly: The case for a dual typology? French Politics 7: 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa, O., Lefébure, P., Rozenberg, O., Schnatterer, T. and Kerrouche, E. (2012) Far away, so close: Parliament and citizens in France. Journal of Legislative Studies 18(3–4): 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costa, O. and Siefken, S. T. (2014) Representation and MPs’ district work in France and Germany. Consequences of institutional incentives. Paper presented at the 2nd General Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Parliaments. Vienna: 26–28 June 2014.Google Scholar
  20. Dolezal, M. and Müller. W. C. (2001) Die wahlkreisarbeit. In: W.C. Müller, M. Jenny, B. Steininger, M. Dolezal, W. Philipp and S. Preisl-Westphal (eds.) Die österreichischen Abgeordneten. Individuelle Präferenzen und politisches Verhalten. Vienna: WUV Universitätverlag.Google Scholar
  21. Dudzinska, A., Poyet, C., Costa, O. and Weßels, B. (2014) Representational roles. In: K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds.) Representing the People. A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eagles, M., Koop, R. and Loat, A. (2014) MPs on the home front: How constituency characteristics influence representational approaches. In: E. Gidengil and H. Bastedo (eds.) Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up Perceptions and Performance. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ellickson, M. C. and Whistler, D. E. (2001) Explaining state legislators’ casework and public resource allocations. Political Research Quarterly 54(3): 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fenno, R. F. (1978) Home Style. House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  25. Fenno, R. F. (2007) Congressional Travels: Places, Connections, and Authenticity. Zug: Pearson.Google Scholar
  26. François, A. and Weill, L. (2016) Does holding a local mandate alter the activities of deputies? Evidence from the French Assemblée Nationale. French Politics 14(1): 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frears, J. (1990) The French parliament: Loyal workhorse, poor watchdog. West European Politics 13(3): 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Genieys, W. (2011) Sociologie politique des élites. Paris: A. Colin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grémion, P. (1976) Le Pouvoir périphérique. Bureaucrates et notables dans le système politique français, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Guérin-Lavignotte, E. and Kerrouche, E. (2006) Les élus locaux en Europe. Un statut en mutation. Paris: La documentation française.Google Scholar
  31. Halligan, J., Krause, R., Williams, R. and Hawker, G. (1988) Constituency service among sub-national legislators in Australia and Canada. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13(1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herzog, D., Rebenstorf, H., Werner, C. and Wessels, B. (1990) Abgeordnete und Bürger. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Jewell, M. J. (1982) Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
  35. Johannes, J. R. (1984) To Serve the People. Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kam, C. J. (2009) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kerrouche, E. (2009) Usages et Usagers de la permanence du député. Revue française de science politique 59(3): 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lacam, J.-P. (1988) Le politicien investisseur. Un modèle d’interprétation de la gestion des ressources politiques. Revue française de science politique 38(1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lancaster, T. D. (2011) Constituency service in multitiered systems: The case of Austria. Paper presented at the 2011 ECPR Joint Session of Workshop. St. Gallen, 12–17 April 2011.Google Scholar
  40. Le Lidec, P. (2008) Les députés, leurs assistants et les usages du crédit collaborateurs. Une sociologie du travail politique. Sociologie du travail 50(2): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marmont, T. (2010) Devenir “amateur” en politique. Les ressources politiques des élus ruraux. In: S. Barone and A. Troupel (eds.) Battre la campagne. Elections et pouvoir municipal en milieu rural. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  42. Navarro, J. (2013) Le cumul des mandats: une comparaison européenne. In: A. Francois and J. Navarro (eds.) Le cumul des mandats en France: causes et conséquences. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  43. Norris, P. (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norton, P. and Wood, D. M. (1990) Constituency service by members of parliament: Does it contribute to a personal vote? Parliamentary Affairs 43(2): 196–208.Google Scholar
  45. Pilet, J.-B., Costa, O. and Freire, A. (2012) Political representation in Belgium, France and Portugal: MPs and their constituents in very different political systems. Representation 48(4): 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poyet, C. (2013) Individual resources and constituency work styles among French MPs. Paper presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux, 4-7 September 2013.Google Scholar
  47. Poyet, C. (2014) Explaining MPs constituency orientation: A QCA approach. Paper presented at the 110th APSA Annual Conference. Washington, DC: 28–31 August 2014.Google Scholar
  48. Poyet, C. (2016) Le Député Prisonnier de Sa Circonscription: Étude de La Réactivité Des Parlementaires Au Prisme Des Contraintes Institutionnelles et Territoriales. Ph.D. dissertation, Bordeaux: Sciences Po Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  49. Rouban, L. (2014) Le nouveau pouvoir urbain en 2014: les maires des villes de plus de 30 000 habitants. Élections municipales 2014, Les enjeux, note 11. Paris: CEVIPOF.Google Scholar
  50. Roy, J.-P. (2008) Être conseiller général au XXIè siècle. Orléans: Demeter.Google Scholar
  51. Schindler, D. and Siefken, S. T. (2013) Wahlkreisarbeit der Abgeordneten des Deutschen Bundestages – ein Beitrag zur Parlamentarischen Kontrolle? In: B. Eberbach-Born, S. Kropp, A. Stuchlik and W. ZEH (eds.) Parlamentarische Kontrolle und Europäische Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  52. Siefken, S. T. and Costa, O. (forthcoming) MPs’ district work in France and Germany. In: O.W. Gabriel, E. Kerrouche and S.S. Schuettemeyer (eds.) Political Representation in France and Germany: Attitudes and Activities of Citizens and MPs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, A. (1998) The politics of economic development in a French rural area. In: N. Walzer and B.D. Jacobs (eds.) Public–Private Partnerships for Local Economic Development. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  54. Sorbets, C. (1993) Le mot et la chose. In: A. Mabileau (ed.) A la recherche du local. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  55. Strøm, K. (2012) Roles as strategies: Towards a logic of legislative behavior. In: M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.) Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Thomas, S. (1992) The effects of race and gender on constituency service. The Western Political Quarterly 45(1): 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomassen, J. and Andeweg, R. B. (2004) Beyond collective representation: Individual members of parliament and interest representation in the Netherlands. Journal of Legislative Studies 10(4): 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uslaner, E. M. (1985) Casework and institutional design: Redeeming promises in the promised land. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10(1): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wasserstein, R. L. and Lazar, N. A. (2016) The ASA’s statement on P-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician 70(2): 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Emile Durkheim, Sciences Po Bordeaux, CNRSPessacFrance
  2. 2.Sciences Po GrenobleSaint-Martin-d’HèresFrance

Personalised recommendations