Heigh Ho, Heigh Ho: flexible labor contracts with real option characteristics

  • Julie Byrne
  • Rowena A. Pecchenino
Original Article


What is the strategic value of flexible labor contracts to workers? To answer this question, we examine workers’ labor supply decisions when choosing among alternative work arrangements ranging from permanent and pensionable to fixed-term, shift work, zero-hour, and on-call to gigs. We then introduce the concept of real options as a framework in which to analyze contract valuation from the workers’ perspective. For a non-standard employment contract to have real option value, the contract must both lead to future choices and enable advantageous access to future opportunities. Using case studies from a diverse set of industries and guided by the real options framework, we examine when contract flexibility contains valuable real option characteristics for the utility maximizing worker, or the profit maximizing firm, or, surprisingly, both.


Alternative work arrangements Flexibility Gig economy Real options Standard labor contract 


  1. Ahmed, Kamal. 2017. Government review to order zero-hours contracts overhaul. 23 May. Accessed 11 July 2017 at 14:58.
  2. Anderson, Deborah, Melissa Binder, and Kate Krause. 2003. Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56 (2): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askenazy, Philippe. 2004. Shorter work time, hours flexibility and labor intensification. Eastern Economic Journal 30 (4): 603–614.Google Scholar
  4. Belman, Dale, and Lonnie Golden. 2000. Nonstandard and Contingent Employment: Contrasts by Job Type, Industry, and Occupation. In Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, ed. F. Carré, M. Ferber, L. Golden, and S. Herzenberg, 167–212. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, Peter, Gerhard Bosch, and Jean Charest. 2014. Working-time configurations: A framework for analyzing diversity across countries. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67 (3): 805–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernhardt, Annette, and Dave E. Marcotte. 2000. Is standard employment still what it used to be? In Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, ed. F. Carré, M. Ferber, L. Golden, and S. Herzenberg, 21–40. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, Mousami, and Patrick M. Wright. 2005. Managing human assets in an uncertain world: Applying real option theory to HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (6): 929–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, Fischer and Myron Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, David, and Tetyana Shdyvko. 2011. Labor market rigidities and the employment behavior of older workers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 64 (3): 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosch, Gerhard. 2004. Towards a new standard employment relationship in western Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 42 (2): 617–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broschak, Joseph P., and Alison Davis-Blake. 2006. Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Academy of Management Journal 49 (2): 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buddelmeyer, Hielke, Duncan McVicar, and Mark Wooden. 2015. Non-standard contingent employment and job satisfaction: a panel data analysis. Industrial Relations 54 (2): 256–275.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, Glenn. 2016. Senior sharing citizens: a guide to the best jobs for seniors. Casual Capitalist. March 16. Accessed 11 July 2017 at 15:10.
  14. Cobble, Dorothy Sue, and Keah F. Vosko. 2000. Historical perspectives on representing nonstandard workers. In Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, ed. F. Carré, M. Ferber, L. Golden, and S. Herzenberg, 291–312. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  15. Cohany, Sharon R. 1996. Workers in alternative employment arrangements. Monthly Labor Review 119 (10): 31–45.Google Scholar
  16. Connelly, Catherine E., and Daniel G. Gallagher. 2004. Emerging trends in contingent work. Journal of Management 30 (6): 959–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D’Alessandro Chris. 2017. We asked McDonald’s employees what their jobs are actually like. 24 April. Accessed 11 July 2017 at 13:54.
  18. Danziger, Anna, and Boots, Shelly Waters. 2008. Lower wage workers and flexible work arrangement. Working paper, The Scholarly Commons, Georgetown Law.Google Scholar
  19. Davis-Blake, Alison, Joseph P. Broschak, and Elizabeth George. 2003. Happy together? how using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal 46 (4): 475–485.Google Scholar
  20. Doeringer, Peter B., and Michael J. Piore. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington.Google Scholar
  21. Drache, Daniel, Anne LeMesurier, and Yanick Noiseux. 2015. Non-standard employment, the jobs crisis and precarity: a report on the structural transformation of the world of work. Practa Report.Google Scholar
  22. Drago, Robert, Mark Wooden, and David Black. 2009. Who wants and gets flexibility? Changing work hours preferences and life events. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 62 (3): 394–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Euwals, Rob. 2001. Female labor supply, flexibility of working hours, and job mobility. Economic Journal 111 (471): C120–C134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farrell, Chris. 2015. Work from home in retirement: one win-win solution. 29 May. Accessed 12 July 2017 at 10:09.
  25. Foote, D., and T. Folta. 2002. Temporary workers as real options. Human Resource Management Review 12 (4): 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gielen, Anne C. 2009. Working hours flexibility and older workers’ labor supply. Oxford Economic Papers 61 (2): 240–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golden, Lonnie. 2001. Flexible work schedules: What are we trading off to get them? Monthly Labor Review 124 (3): 50–67.Google Scholar
  28. Goldin, Claudia. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review. 96 (2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guidetti, Giovanni, and Giulio Pedrini. 2013. Systemic flexibility and human capital development: the relationship between non-standard employment and workplace training. Quaderni—Working Paper DSE N°1019.Google Scholar
  30. Haahtela, Tero J. 2012. Differences between financial options and real options. Lecture Notes in Management Science 4: 169–178.Google Scholar
  31. Hipp, Lena, and Christopher J. Anderson. 2015. Laziness or liberation? Labor market policies and workers’ attitudes toward employment flexibility. International Journal of Social Welfare 24 (4): 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins, Laurence, and Helen Fairfoul. 2014. Employer perspectives on ‘zero hours’ contracts in UK higher education. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy 9: 10.Google Scholar
  33. Horowitz, Sara. 2000. New Thinking on Worker Groups’ Role in a Flexible Economy. In Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, ed. Françoise Carré, Marianne A. Ferber, Lonnie Golden, and Stephen A. Herzenberg, 393–398. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  34. Juhn, Chinhui, and Simon Potter. 2006. Changes in labor force participation in the united states. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20 (3): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalleberg, Arne. 2000. Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalleberg, Arne. 2003. Flexible firms and labor market segmentation: Effects of workplace restructuring on jobs and workers. Work and Occupations. 30 (2): 154–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Katz, Laurence F, and Alan B. Krueger. 2016. The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. Harvard University Department of Economics Working Paper.Google Scholar
  38. Klerman, Jacob Alex, and Arleen Leibowitz. 1990. Child care and women’s return to work after childbirth. American Economic Review. 80 (2): 84–88.Google Scholar
  39. Lambert, Susan J., Peter J. Fugiel, and Julia R. Henly. 2014. Schedule Unpredictability among Early Career Workers in the U.S. Labor Market: A National Snapshot. EINet (Employment Instability, Family Well-being, and Social Policy Network) at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Lindbeck, Assar, and Dennis J. Snower. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. May, Robyn, David Peetz, and Glenda Strachan. 2013. Workforce development and renewal in Australian universities and the management of casual academic staff. Journal of University Learning and Teaching Practice 10 (3): 3.Google Scholar
  42. McCollum, David, and Allan Findlay. 2015. ‘Flexible’ workers for ‘flexible’jobs? The labor market function of A8 migrant labor in the UK. Work, Employment & Society 29 (3): 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Musselin, Christine. 2005. European academic labor markets in transition. Higher Education 49 (1/2): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakamura, Leonard, Jon Samuels, and Rachel Slovoviechik. 2016. Valuing “Free” Media in GDP: An Experimental Approach. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Research Department Working Paper 16–24.Google Scholar
  45. Piore, Michael. 1986. Perspectives on labor market flexibility. Industrial Relations. 25 (2): 146–166.Google Scholar
  46. 2010. A day in the life of a London bank’s software contractor. Accessed 29 June 2017 at 14:58.
  47. Raphael, Adrienne. 2014. TaskRabbit redux. The New Yorker online. Accessed 11 July 2017 at 14:36.
  48. Schmid, Günther. 2010. Non-standard employment and labor force participation: a comparative view of the recent development in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5087.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner, Natalie, and Barbara Pocock. 2010. Work, life, flexibility and workplace culture in Australia: results of the 2008 Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI) survey. Australian Bulletin of Labor. 36 (2): 133–153.Google Scholar
  50. Torpay, Elka, and Andrew Hogan. 2016. Working in a gig economy. USBLS Career Outlook. May.Google Scholar
  51. Van Emmerik, H., and K. Sanders. 2004. Social embeddedness and job performance of tenured and non-tenured professionals. Human Resource Management Journal 14 (4): 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, Bernard. 2011. How does non-standard employment affect workers?: A consideration of the evidence. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 36 (3): 15–30.Google Scholar
  53. Waterhouse, Jennifer, and Linda Colley. 2010. The work-life provisions of the fair work act: A compromise of stakeholder preference. Australian Bulletin of Labor 36 (2): 154–177.Google Scholar
  54. Wilthagen, Ton, and Frank Tros. 2004. The concept of ‘flexicurity’: A new approach to regulating employment and labor markets. Transfers 2: 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmermann, Jackie. 2015. This is What it Takes to Make $2,000 a Week Working on TaskRabbit. Accessed 11/7/2019 at 14:30.

Copyright information

© National Association for Business Economics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michael Smurfit Graduate School of BusinessUniversity College DublinBlackrockIreland
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Finance and AccountingMaynooth University, National University of Ireland, MaynoothMaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations