Advertisement

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 79, Issue 4, pp 594–600 | Cite as

A Primal Environment for a 21st Century’s “Naissance”. Thoughts on the Language of Tenderness in Ferenczi’s Footsteps*

  • Julianna VamosEmail author
Article

Abstract

In a progressive maternity clinic in Paris, “Les Bluets”, the team and the psychoanalyst work to create a supportive atmosphere, so that the newborn infant and the new parents can receive a respectful welcome with a holding environment. The main participants around the newborn are the parents, midwives, and nurses, and the team members share their observations about how to answer the infant’s needs, and adjust and satisfy his/her comfort. This meets what Ferenczi describes as tenderness. Specific, detailed feedback is given so the experience of mother-father-baby cooperation can start to take place from the very beginning. In case the baby is left for adoption, he/she is treated with even more attentive caregiving where all the details are very important.

Keywords

Post-natal intervention Baby’s active role Language of tenderness Cooperation Care for adoption Ferenczi 

Notes

References

  1. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. In J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N.Z. Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. The language of tenderness and of passion. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac Books. 1994. Also in International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225–230. 1949.Google Scholar
  3. Martino, B. (2000). Lóczy, une maison pour grandir. [Lóczy, a house in which to grow up] Documentary film by the Association Pikler-Lóczy-France; edition érès: www.edition-eres.com.
  4. Pikler, E. (1984). Importance du mouvement dans le développement de la personne initiative-competence [The importance of movement in the development of the person: Initiative and competence]. La Médecine Infantile,91(3), 273–278.Google Scholar
  5. Stern, D. (2000). The interpersonal world of the baby. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Szanto, A. (2012). Lóczy, un nouveau paradigme? L’Institut Pikler dans un miroir à facettes multiples [Lóczy, a new paradigm? The Pikler institute in a multi-faceted miror]. In Le fil rouge. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
  7. Tardos, A. (2008a). Les soins corporels à la pouponnière de Lóczy de I’Institut Emmi Pikler [The bodycare in the residential nursery of Lóczy in the Pikler Institute]. In M. David (Ed.), Le bébé, ses parents, leurs soignants (pp. 117–132). Paris: Érés Edition.Google Scholar
  8. Tardos, A. (2008b). La main de la nurse in Spirale no 48. Paris: Érés Edition.Google Scholar
  9. Vamos, J. (2009). Nés sous X, mais pas abandonné. The Signal No 1-2 volume 17 Google Scholar
  10. Vamos, J. (2015). Free to move, free to be. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,75, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. WAIMH (World Association of Infant Mental Health). https://waimh.org/.

Filmography

  1. Wincler, V. (2014). Hello Baby, [vimeo]. https://vimeo.com/285636066.

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations