Advertisement

Postmemory

  • Stephen FroshEmail author
Article

Abstract

The urgency of the problem of how to learn from the relatively recent past in order not to repeat its devastating effects, a problem that revolves around the ethics of memory and history, has combined with an awareness that later generations of victims and perpetrators—the “post” generations—may find themselves inhibited in relation to moving forwards because they are not truly “post” at all. It is as if they are haunted by the experiences of their predecessors, which is passed on in some way through stories and selective silences, as well as through the older generation’s ways of handling themselves and the personal and cultural representations of their situation. This article presents a psychoanalytic reading of the postmemory literature, drawing on second generation Holocaust literature and in particular rendering the distinction between postmemory as a mode of traumatic identification and postmemorial work as a form of working through. Active memorial work that allows repetitions to be turned into processes of recovery is essential for the laying of ghosts to rest.

Keywords

postmemory Holocaust trauma working-through 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper will be part of the book: Those who come after: Postmemory, Acknowledgement and Forgiveness by Stephen Frosh, to be published by Palgrave.

References

  1. Baraitser, L. (2017). Enduring time. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, D. (2017). The Jewish joke: An essay with examples (less essay, more examples). London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, J. (2016). Non-violence as respect for all suffering: Thoughts inspired by Eyad El Sarraj. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 21, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, J. (2017). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyarin, J. (1996). Thinking in Jewish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. The language of tenderness and of passion. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac Books. 1994. Also in International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225–230, published in 1949.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1896). The Aetiology of hysteria. Standard edition (Vol. 3, pp. 163–168). London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. Standard edition (Vol. 10, pp. 145–156). London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating, and working-though. Standard edition (Vol. 12, pp. 145–156). London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard edition (Vol. 18, pp. 1–64). London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frosh, S. (2013). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grünberg, K., & Markert, F. (2017). Child survivors: Stolen childhood–Scenic memory of the Shoah in Jewish child or adolescent survivors of Nazi persecution. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirsch, M. (2012). The generation of postmemory: Writing and visual culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffman, E. (2005). After such knowledge. Memory, history, and the legacy of the Holocaust. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. LaCapra, D. (1998). History and memory after Auschwitz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Laplanche, J. (1999). Essays on otherness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Levi, P. (1988). The drowned and the saved. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  19. Luckhurst, R. (2008). The trauma question. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, I. S. (2018). Beyond anti-thinking: Psychoanalysis and politics. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yerushalmi, Y. (1989). Zachor: Jewish history and Jewish memory. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial StudiesBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations