Advertisement

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 28–46 | Cite as

Ethical Presence in the Psychoanalytic Encounter and the Role of Apology*

  • Micha Weiss
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses aspects of ethical presence in psychoanalysis, and the possible use of apology in the therapeutic process. The author roughly delineates two periods in the history of psychoanalysis regarding the ethical dimension—the early classical period which is influenced by Freud’s ethics of honesty, which gradually evolves towards the more recent intersubjectively-influenced period, necessitating the assimilation of an ethics of relationships. It is suggested that explicit theorizing of the ethical dimension into psychoanalysis offers added value to its effectiveness, and a framework is presented for combining relational, intersubjectively informed ethical dialogue, with contributions of classical technique, enriching the therapeutic potential of psychoanalytic work.

Keywords

ethics ethical dialogue apology in psychoanalysis therapeutic potential of ethical presence 

References

  1. Akhtar, S. (2018). Humility. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78(1).Google Scholar
  2. Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aron, L. & Harris, A. (Eds.). (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, J. (1995). Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual differences. New Haven, CT: Yale Universities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, J. (2009). A relational psychoanalysis perspective on the necessity of acknowledging failure in order to restore the facilitating and containing features of the intersubjective relationship (the shared third). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 90, 441–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berman, E. (1999). Sándor Ferenczi today: Reviving the broken dialectic. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 303–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buber, M. (1999). Martin Buber on psychology and psychotherapy: Essays, letters, and dialogue. In J. B. Agassi (Ed.) New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Celenza, A. & Gabbard, G. O. (2003). Analysts who commit sexual boundary violations: A lost cause? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 617–636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chessick, R. D. (1994). On corruption. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 22, 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chetrit-Vatine, V. (2014). The ethical seduction of the analytic situation: The feminine/maternal origins of responsibility for the other. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, J. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway? Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 711–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupont, J. (1988). Introduction. In J. Dupont (Ed.) Ferenczi, S. (1932). The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi (M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) (pp. xi–xxvii). Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. In Psychological Issues, Vol 1/1. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  15. Erikson, E. (1964). Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insights. In Insight and Responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insights. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Fairbairn, W. R. B. (1946). Object-relationships and dynamic structure. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 30–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferenczi, S. (1928). Elasticity of psychoanalytic technique. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (pp. 87–101). London: Karnac. 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. (J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of the tongues between the adults and the child (The Language of Tenderness and of Passion). First English publication in 1949. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225230. Also in Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac. 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Fonagy, P. & Allison, L. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51, 372–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. Standard edition, 12 (pp. 109–120). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  22. Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through. Standard edition, 12 (pp. 145–156). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  23. Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis III). Standard edition, 12 (pp. 157–171). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1937) Analysis terminable and interminable. Standard edition, 23 (pp. 211–253). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  25. Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  26. Gabbard, G. O. and Lester, E. P. (1995). Nonsexual boundary violations. Chapter 7: In Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis (pp. 122–147). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Gert, B. and Gert, J. (2017). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall, 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/morality-definition/.
  28. Ghent, E. (1989). Credo—The dialectics of one-person and two-person psychologies. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25, 169–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1993.Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg, A. (1987). The place of apology in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. The International Review of Psychoanalysis, 14, 409–417.Google Scholar
  31. Hartmann, H. (1960). Psychoanalysis and moral values. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hirsh, I. (2008). Coasting in the countertransference: Conflicts of self interest between analyst and patient. New York: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Therapeutic passion in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobs, T. J. (2001). On misreading and misleading patients: Some reflections on communications, miscommunications and countertransference enactments. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 653–669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kekes, J. (2000). Pluralism in philosophy: Changing the subject. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27, 99–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure?. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lazar, R. (2002). The intersubjective approach to psychotherapeutic action. Sihot, 16, 158–165. (in Hebrew Journal).Google Scholar
  41. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  42. Meissner, W. W. (2003). The ethical dimension of psychoanalysis. A dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  43. Meissner, W. W. (2007). What if there is an ethical dimension in psychoanalysis? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 541–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, S. A. & Aron, L. (Eds.). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell, S. A. & Black, M. J. (2002). Can love last: The fate of romance over time. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  48. Mucci, C. (2014). Trauma, healing and the reconstruction of truth. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 31–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Oxford English Dictionary. (1995). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rieff, P. (1960). Freud: The mind of the moralist. London: University paperbacks, Metheun.Google Scholar
  51. Rorty, R. (1977). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rorty, R. (1980). Freud, morality, and hermeneutics. New Literary History, 12, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slochower, J. (2003). The analyst’s secret delinquencies. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stark, M. (1999). Modes of therapeutic action: Enhancement of knowledge, provision of experience, and engagement in relationship. Northvale, NJ: Jason & Aronson.Google Scholar
  55. Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  56. Stern, D. B. (2012). Implicit theories of technique and the values that inspire them. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79, 903–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Storolow, R. & Atwood, G. (1993). Faces in a cloud: Intersubjectivity in personality theory. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  59. Storolow, R. D., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wallwork, E. (1991). Psychoanalysis and ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
  62. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena—A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell. Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micha Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.GivatayimIsrael

Personalised recommendations