The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 87–90 | Cite as

The Cut and the Building of Psychoanalysis, Volume 1: Sigmund Freud and Emma Eckstein, by Carlo Bonomi, Routledge, Sussex and New York, 288pp.

  • Aleksandar Dimitrijevic
Book Reviews

In the beginning, there was Roazen (1975, 1995) and he spread light onto the psychoanalytic community deeply immersed in idolazing Freud. Then historiography of psychoanalysis started becoming more objective and accurate. The invaluable work of Ellenberger (1970) was published; Sulloway (1992) challenged most of the conceptions we held dear; Breger (2000) and Rudnytsky (2002, 2011) showed us clearly that Freud’s troubled and unanalyzed personality frequently stood in the way to the further development of the scientific discipline he had founded. And then, upon reading Revolution in Mind by Makari (2008), I felt the field might be exhausted: the history of early psychoanalysis, it seemed to me, could not contain any further significant mysteries.

The Cut and the Building of Psychoanalysis, Volume 1, Sigmund Freud and Emma Ecksteindisclosed all my naivety. Carlo Bonomi has managed not only to describe an extremely important mystery directly related to the origin of psychoanalysis and...


  1. Bonomi, C. (1999). Flight into sanity: Jones’s allegation of Ferenczi’s mental deterioration reconsidered. The International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 80(3), 507–543.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breger, L. (2000). Freud: Darkness in the midst of vision. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1914). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement (Vol. 14, pp. 1–66). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  5. Makari, G. (2008). Revolution in mind: The making of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Roazen, P. (1975). Freud and his followers. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  7. Roazen, P. (1995). How Freud actually worked?. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  8. Rudnytsky, P. L. (2002). Reading psychoanalysis: Freud, Rank, Ferenczi, Groddeck. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Rudnytsky, P. L. (2011). Rescuing psychoanalysis from Freud and other essays in re-vision. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  10. Sulloway, F. J. (1992). Freud, biologist of the mind: Beyond the psychoanalytic legend. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Psychoanalytic UniversityBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations