Limits, limitlessness and the politics of the (Post)human

  • Andy Mousley
Response Essay
  • 13 Downloads

References

  1. Altieri, C . 2007. The Sensuous Dimension of Literary Experience: An Alternative to Materialist Theory. New Literary History 38 (1): 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badmington, N., ed. 2000. Posthumanism. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. Chambers, I . 2001. Culture after Humanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Critchley, S . 2002. On Humour. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Eagleton, T . 2003. After Theory. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  6. Eagleton, T . 2007. The Meaning of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Howard, J.E. and S.C. Shershow, eds. 2001. Marxist Shakespeares. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Mirandola, P. della . 1965. On the Dignity of Man and Other Works, trans. C.G. Wallis, P.J.W. Miller and D. Carmichael. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Mousley, A . 2007. Re-humanising Shakespeare. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mousley, A . 2009. Shakespeare and the Meaning of Life. Shakespeare 5 (2): 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mousley, A . forthcoming. The New Literary Humanism: Towards a Critical Vocabulary. Textual Practice.Google Scholar
  12. Shakespeare, W . 2005. The Oxford Shakespeare, eds. S. Wells, G. Taylor, J. Jewett and W. Montgomery, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sidney, P . 1966. A Defence of Poetry, ed. J Van Dorsten. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Mousley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishDe Montfort UniversityLeicester

Personalised recommendations