Security Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 139–146

Space Time Dynamics of Insurgent Activity in Iraq

  • Michael Townsley
  • Shane D Johnson
  • Jerry H Ratcliffe
Article

Abstract

This paper describes analyses to determine whether there is a space-time dependency for insurgent activity. The data used for the research were 3 months of terrorist incidents attributed to the insurgency in Iraq during U.S. occupation and the methods used are based on a body of work well established using police recorded crime data. It was found that events clustered in space and time more than would be expected if the events were unrelated, suggesting communication of risk in space and time and potentially informing next event prediction. The analysis represents a first but important step and suggestions for further analysis addressing prevention or suppression of future incidents are briefly discussed.

Keywords

terrorism space-time dynamics security in Iraq 

References

  1. Bowers, K.J., Hirschfield, A. and Johnson, S.D. (1998) Victimisation Revisited: A Case Study of Non-Residential Repeat Burglary on Merseyside. British Journal of Criminology. Vol.38, pp 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowers, K.J. and Johnson, S.D. (2005) Domestic Burglary Repeats and Space-Time Clusters: The Dimensions of Risk. European Journal of Criminology. Vol.2, No. 1, pp 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D. and Pease, K. (2004) Prospective Hotspotting: The Future of Crime Mapping. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 44, No. 5, pp 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke, R.V. and Newman, G.R. (2006) Outsmarting the Terrorists. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  5. Cornish, D. and Clarke, R.V. (eds) (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rationale Choice Perspective on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004a) The Burglary as Clue to the Future: The Beginnings of Prospective Hot-Spotting. European Journal of Criminology. Vol. 1, No.2, pp 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004b) The Stability of Space-Time Clusters of Burglary. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 44, No. 1, pp 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K. and Hirschfield, A. (1997) New Insights into the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Repeat Victimisation. The British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 37, No. 2, pp 224–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, S.D., Bernasco, W., Bowers, K.J., Elffers, H., Ratcliffe, J., Rengert, G. and Townsley, M. (2007) Space-Time Patterns of Risk: A Cross National Assessment of Residential Burglary Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp 201–219.Google Scholar
  10. O'Hanlon, M.E. and Kamp, N. (2006) Iraq Index: Tracking Variables of Reconstruction and Security in Post-Saddam Iraq. 14 September 2006, Brookings Institution, www.brookings.edu/iraqindex, site accessed 18 September 2006.
  11. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2000) Aoristic Analysis: The Spatial Interpretation of Unspecific Temporal Events. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. Vol. 14, No. 7, pp 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2002) Aoristic Signatures and the Temporal Analysis of High Volume Crime Patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2004) The Hotspot Matrix: A Framework for the Spatio-Temporal Targeting of Crime Reduction. Police Practice and Research. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2005) Detecting Spatial Movement of Intra-Region Crime Patterns Over Time. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ratcliffe, J.H. and McCullagh, M.J. (1998a) Aoristic Crime Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. Vol. 12, No. 7, pp 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ratcliffe, J.H. and McCullagh, M.J. (1998b) Identifying Repeat Victimisation with GIS. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 38, No. 4, pp 651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratcliffe, J.H. and Rengert, G.F. (2008) Near-Repeat Patterns in Philadelphia Shootings. Security Journal. Vol. 21, No. 1–2, pp 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandler, T. and Arce, M.D.G. (2003) Terrorism & Game Theory. Simulation and Gaming. Vol. 34, No. 3, pp 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2000) Repeat Burglary Victimisation: Spatial and Temporal Patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003) Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Townsley, M. and Pease, K. (2002) How Efficiently Can We Target Prolific Offenders. International Journal of Police Science and Management. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Woo, G. (2007) Terrorism Risk. In Voeller, J.G. (ed.) Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Zipf, G.K. (1949) Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Townsley
    • 1
  • Shane D Johnson
    • 2
  • Jerry H Ratcliffe
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College LondonLondon
  3. 3.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations